Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 15:55:37 +0300
From: Vitaly Chikunov <vt@altlinux.org>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] crypto: streebog - add Streebog hash function
Message-ID: <20181105125537.ux4eehruuncqukli@sole.flsd.net>
References: <20181010121254.12220-1-vt@altlinux.org>
 <20181012061659.mextetc3v7urqkzx@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <20181012064105.bchujbwoaszrcu3l@sole.flsd.net>
 <20181017060851.r5mxvpq3l2ycvpio@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <20181103055145.ndvxd7nbnoqtwrk5@sole.flsd.net>
 <1541422113.21115.44.camel@linux.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1541422113.21115.44.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org

Mimi,

On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 07:48:33AM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Sat, 2018-11-03 at 08:51 +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2018 at 02:08:51PM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 09:41:05AM +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It is the first part of attempts to add to the Integrity subsystem
> > > > ability of verifying file and module signatures by Russian GOST
> > > > algorithms.
> > > 
> > > It would be better if these patches are posted together.  That
> > > way we don't end up with a situation where the algorithm goes into
> > > the kernel but the ultimate user is rejected.
> > 
> > IMA does not need any particular patching inside of their subtree to
> > support new hash, because it is using any hash registered in Hash Info
> > which is still under crypto subtree. I added appropriate patch into v3
> > which is already posted a week ago, and tested it to work correctly with
> > ima_appraise=fix.
> 
> That's true, but the target subsystem should be made aware of the new
> usage.

Did you mean by re-sending the patch with Cc to linux-integrity? Or
something more?

Thanks,