Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_NEOMUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15449C282C3 for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:24:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47AA2184C for ; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 09:24:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727320AbfAXJYH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 04:24:07 -0500 Received: from orcrist.hmeau.com ([104.223.48.154]:40406 "EHLO deadmen.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725987AbfAXJYH (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jan 2019 04:24:07 -0500 Received: from gondobar.mordor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.128.4] helo=gondobar) by deadmen.hmeau.com with esmtps (Exim 4.89 #2 (Debian)) id 1gmbEw-0003Cw-7u; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:24:02 +0800 Received: from herbert by gondobar with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gmbEt-0003Tq-Bk; Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:23:59 +0800 Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2019 17:23:59 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Eric Biggers , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Jason A . Donenfeld" Subject: Re: [RFC/RFT PATCH 00/15] crypto: improved skcipher, aead, and hash tests Message-ID: <20190124092359.hvizqdi2ptjdsot7@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20190123224926.250525-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20190124084818.GA650@sol.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 24, 2019 at 09:50:35AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Thanks for yet another round of cleanup > > I'll look into these, but I'd like to clarify one thing first. > > IIUC, you are trying to deal with the case where a single scatterlist > element describes a range that strides two pages, and I wonder if that > is a valid use of scatterlists in the first place. > > Herbert? Yes it is valid. IIRC the network stack may generate such a scatterlist. Thanks, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt