Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02D99C43381 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8D91218A5 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:08:55 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="OoOli8X+" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728447AbfCOIIz (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 04:08:55 -0400 Received: from mail-oi1-f196.google.com ([209.85.167.196]:39396 "EHLO mail-oi1-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728442AbfCOIIy (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Mar 2019 04:08:54 -0400 Received: by mail-oi1-f196.google.com with SMTP id b4so6615033oif.6 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 01:08:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7WQoXypAXrxybsmQKtSam1AksL633abiOo+v7tB9icc=; b=OoOli8X+AjcDBY/pignwFI1RAA/JcTstIp2mVK8arIpkznltMOuelK/K2h6dN8dZcd yJ9uF6W2lVSvPpOqxq6LWGIdOkiurIaX9p0i7UYuh40F/z7lvyt4vxfqEut6SnbktxMo 9gdT5UAjFBMd26mGuImxOKlq1f2UfqKPxPTjwk/8Wqi8jTbsLPfCCZt3Z1BNAl2UH7X5 kcOlEI0dw6JDN3pyisEVknZnLziH46GqYyMoGPLh1FLqRpKWzzeARgcnqgL+7Lgt9TiA UZ9lBGG2V13S3H4Dw+WQR38qlzlROOMNyOgsipa36M7MDBhnPiMmYYjNdYUmRa2rp/qY rChQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7WQoXypAXrxybsmQKtSam1AksL633abiOo+v7tB9icc=; b=Yb4EpvPlD+PJTLbTbHo9Jvs273+xNOAspmg0qjNPka7KHediBEbeFG5MuPFCWp7rk3 bWxbe1cTNrW9H0KTHFDAyEO3pchnJLwkezz4797OnGJpw4IOUs0w5vVUQDHjg3WBuaFU ++aCYQXMAvkvHqFK+fbrmbrdomPwywGfAjJ0ytYZX2r9iA4iZbrjH2e5ZRtZqxzkXB4N NRUJiwv4AMMbLyPqNayEo1azVPN9BQPtE7QQsvAzEEny7cNBTBsqrY8Tg+9pI4aFdMr2 jFrTemCKU2PQFbdGXgoZgxU7I+3SXG67e38rmGbwUcprCxxNrC5vFEIRM2XxugMKO7Kw J2LQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU+KWDMkK1N3Cq2reBUCyRIKfkWRHqhROhEAFug/X7rrtANLisy XbtPBcTv6WPpYik/H44zF3mibP3zmGZfRcnkCMBRqg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwD9/V79jVE6AWGOYI7YpP5atpGo/lt/mCJGIGvQDCiaVnT4fXCq5oqkOzrmht8+JTjoN3DJr7nuRHVX45Zft8= X-Received: by 2002:aca:bc0b:: with SMTP id m11mr777925oif.41.1552637333930; Fri, 15 Mar 2019 01:08:53 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190315040239.24705-1-vakul.garg@nxp.com> <20190315040239.24705-2-vakul.garg@nxp.com> In-Reply-To: <20190315040239.24705-2-vakul.garg@nxp.com> From: Chris Spencer Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 08:08:42 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: caam/jr - Remove spinlock for output job ring To: Vakul Garg Cc: "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , Horia Geanta , Aymen Sghaier Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hi Vakul, On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 04:05, Vakul Garg wrote: > For each job ring pair, the output ring is processed exactly by one cpu > at a time under a tasklet context (one per ring). Therefore, there is no > need to protect a job ring's access & its private data structure using a > lock. Hence the lock can be removed. > > Signed-off-by: Vakul Garg This comment in caam_jr_dequeue doesn't really make sense anymore: /* Stash callback params for use outside of lock */ Since the lock has been removed you could probably get away with just invoking the user callback immediately which would simplify the code a little. Thanks, Chris