Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7CCC10F00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B958F2064A for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 19:12:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388081AbfC0TMI (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 15:12:08 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:38968 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388818AbfC0SKa (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:10:30 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2RI9sEb092006 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:10:28 -0400 Received: from e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.100]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rgcb05eba-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:10:28 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp04.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.134) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:22 -0000 Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.160]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2RIAL3541812212 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:22 GMT Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD321A4060; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3143A4064; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-153.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.153]) by b06wcsmtp001.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 18:10:20 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] integrity: support EC-RDSA signatures for asymmetric_verify From: Mimi Zohar To: Vitaly Chikunov , Herbert Xu , David Howells , Dmitry Kasatkin , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:10:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190326125842.24110-11-vt@altlinux.org> References: <20190326125842.24110-1-vt@altlinux.org> <20190326125842.24110-11-vt@altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032718-0016-0000-0000-00000267D81D X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032718-0017-0000-0000-000032C3167B Message-Id: <1553710220.4608.9.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-27_12:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903270127 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 2019-03-26 at 15:58 +0300, Vitaly Chikunov wrote: > Allow to use EC-RDSA signatures for IMA by determining signature type by > the hash algorithm name. This works good for EC-RDSA since Streebog and > EC-RDSA should always be used together. > > Cc: Mimi Zohar > Cc: Dmitry Kasatkin > Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org > Signed-off-by: Vitaly Chikunov > --- > security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > index d775e03fbbcc..99080871eb9f 100644 > --- a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > +++ b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > @@ -104,9 +104,16 @@ int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig, > > memset(&pks, 0, sizeof(pks)); > > - pks.pkey_algo = "rsa"; > pks.hash_algo = hash_algo_name[hdr->hash_algo]; > - pks.encoding = "pkcs1"; > + if (hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_256 || > + hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_512) { > + /* EC-RDSA and Streebog should go together. */ > + pks.pkey_algo = "ecrdsa"; > + pks.encoding = "raw"; IMA signatures are stored as xattrs, making them persistent.  Support for streebog was upstreamed in linux-5.0.  This change would break existing systems using streebog.  As long as this is not yet a concern Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar > + } else { > + pks.pkey_algo = "rsa"; > + pks.encoding = "pkcs1"; > + } > pks.digest = (u8 *)data; > pks.digest_size = datalen; > pks.s = hdr->sig;