Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 678F6C10F00 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D28921734 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727453AbfC0UV3 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:29 -0400 Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.156.1]:58878 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727328AbfC0UVR (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:17 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098393.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2RK93Ob011357 for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:15 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rgd49qscb-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:15 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:13 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.194) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:10 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps3074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2RKL9R853084220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:09 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36BED52050; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from dhcp-9-31-103-153.watson.ibm.com (unknown [9.31.103.153]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EA65204E; Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:21:08 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] integrity: support EC-RDSA signatures for asymmetric_verify From: Mimi Zohar To: Vitaly Chikunov Cc: Herbert Xu , David Howells , Dmitry Kasatkin , linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 16:21:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20190327201441.ikw76qzpgzm6t35b@altlinux.org> References: <20190326125842.24110-1-vt@altlinux.org> <20190326125842.24110-11-vt@altlinux.org> <1553710220.4608.9.camel@linux.ibm.com> <20190327201441.ikw76qzpgzm6t35b@altlinux.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032720-0008-0000-0000-000002D24DBF X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032720-0009-0000-0000-0000223E803D Message-Id: <1553718067.4608.43.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-27_13:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=3 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903270140 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org > > diff --git a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > > > index d775e03fbbcc..99080871eb9f 100644 > > > --- a/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > > > +++ b/security/integrity/digsig_asymmetric.c > > > @@ -104,9 +104,16 @@ int asymmetric_verify(struct key *keyring, const char *sig, > > > > > > memset(&pks, 0, sizeof(pks)); > > > > > > - pks.pkey_algo = "rsa"; > > > pks.hash_algo = hash_algo_name[hdr->hash_algo]; > > > - pks.encoding = "pkcs1"; > > > + if (hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_256 || > > > + hdr->hash_algo == HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_512) { > > > + /* EC-RDSA and Streebog should go together. */ > > > + pks.pkey_algo = "ecrdsa"; > > > + pks.encoding = "raw"; > > > > IMA signatures are stored as xattrs, making them persistent.  Support > > for streebog was upstreamed in linux-5.0.  This change would break > > existing systems using streebog.  As long as this is not yet a concern > > In what sense it would break systems? For example, if executable files are currently labeled with rsa/streebog signatures, then enforcing file data integrity I assume would break if the kernel uses ecrdsa/streebog. Mimi > > Unless kernel crashes or signature is recognized as valid, I think, it should > not be called a break. > > > Reviewed-by:  Mimi Zohar > > Thanks! > > > > > > + } else { > > > + pks.pkey_algo = "rsa"; > > > + pks.encoding = "pkcs1"; > > > + } > > > pks.digest = (u8 *)data; > > > pks.digest_size = datalen; > > > pks.s = hdr->sig; >