Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECD6EC10F11 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1841821773 for ; Wed, 24 Apr 2019 18:33:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=chronox.de header.i=@chronox.de header.b="Q+knvpR1" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387825AbfDXSdx (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:33:53 -0400 Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de ([81.169.146.164]:16945 "EHLO mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1733024AbfDXSdw (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 14:33:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1556130830; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=chronox.de; h=References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Date:Subject:Cc:To:From: X-RZG-CLASS-ID:X-RZG-AUTH:From:Subject:Sender; bh=ztRZ8SZCmF9XNLy1UHtfoSMUUhjMciaT/ucfRjdlQGc=; b=Q+knvpR1iU/3TlblS8BnmWfrjmWlq5lzJuB328ajaeWrKxIuqLocY8t7ACboyeUFdH G47KAhxWMTV5FwqWPikShOXlRAj1zii/G8rIwwnVKVNA2KydoW3yIMpZ0mWWlqSgcWmh AnSi9IbKfCAKuWHL/RHLpDT2YGgU5tMsTINojRvV5fKkOWd7HecVCeFBEHIDgtRT9JPo J6X5MFrbZE7q6KMvyHswwh8Zl8HeYWBG0280hKxvlNgkXkrZh7Havf8Xp3uTYPQ2dRjF ySIszZ71BgI7SIolFGeDrIU6Ba89fNH+vnzbgILdtcYtmqJeFss8Xot3l4yrQpv+MaE2 vP+g== X-RZG-AUTH: ":P2ERcEykfu11Y98lp/T7+hdri+uKZK8TKWEqNyiHySGSa9k9x2cdNU9qrVA3/I2bquZ6" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from tauon.chronox.de by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 44.18 DYNA|AUTH) with ESMTPSA id R0373fv3OIUZ6mS (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (curve secp521r1 with 521 ECDH bits, eq. 15360 bits RSA)) (Client did not present a certificate); Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:30:35 +0200 (CEST) From: Stephan Mueller To: Kalyani Akula Cc: "herbert@gondor.apana.org.au" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] crypto: Adds user space interface for ALG_SET_KEY_TYPE Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:30:35 +0200 Message-ID: <18759853.IUaQuE38eh@tauon.chronox.de> In-Reply-To: References: <1547708541-23730-1-git-send-email-kalyani.akula@xilinx.com> <4735882.YQOrfzxm5S@tauon.chronox.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Am Montag, 22. April 2019, 11:17:55 CEST schrieb Kalyani Akula: Hi Kalyani, > > Besides, seem to be more a key handling issue. Wouldn't it make sense to > > rather have such issue solved with key rings than in the kernel crypto > > API? > > [kalyani] Can you please elaborate on this further ? The kernel has a keyring support in security/keys which has a user space interface with keyutils. That interface is commonly used for any sort of key manipulation. Ciao Stephan