Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] s390/pkey: Use -ENODEV instead of -EOPNOTSUPP
To:     David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
References: <20190612102248.18903-1-david@redhat.com>
 <20190612102248.18903-2-david@redhat.com>
From:   Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Wed, 12 Jun 2019 12:39:01 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20190612102248.18903-2-david@redhat.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Message-Id: <7f313d87-f9ea-e291-49e2-8da29cf41680@linux.ibm.com>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On 12.06.19 12:22, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> systemd-modules-load.service automatically tries to load the pkey module
> on systems that have MSA.
>
> Pkey also requires the MSA3 facility and a bunch of subfunctions.
> Failing with -EOPNOTSUPP makes "systemd-modules-load.service" fail on
> any system that does not have all needed subfunctions. For example,
> when running under QEMU TCG (but also on systems where protected keys
> are disabled via the HMC).
>
> Let's use -ENODEV, so systemd-modules-load.service properly ignores
> failing to load the pkey module because of missing HW functionality.
>
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/pkey_api.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/pkey_api.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/pkey_api.c
> index 45eb0c14b880..ddfcefb47284 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/pkey_api.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/pkey_api.c
> @@ -1695,15 +1695,15 @@ static int __init pkey_init(void)
>  	 * are able to work with protected keys.
>  	 */
>  	if (!cpacf_query(CPACF_PCKMO, &pckmo_functions))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	/* check for kmc instructions available */
>  	if (!cpacf_query(CPACF_KMC, &kmc_functions))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  	if (!cpacf_test_func(&kmc_functions, CPACF_KMC_PAES_128) ||
>  	    !cpacf_test_func(&kmc_functions, CPACF_KMC_PAES_192) ||
>  	    !cpacf_test_func(&kmc_functions, CPACF_KMC_PAES_256))
> -		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	pkey_debug_init();
>  
You missed one match in this file. Function pkey_clr2protkey()
also does a cpacf_test_func() and may return -EOPNOTSUPP.
I checked the call chain, it's save to change the returncode there also.
If done, Thanks and add my
reviewed-by: Harald Freudenberger <freude@linux.ibm.com>