Received: by 2002:a25:ab43:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id u61csp836296ybi; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:15:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyKQoOBLhCYYzRoQbIr+HGjOlj6q5wEGuVSMvnysrRPc4lqP9MBcNNYURP2UgAMZxKOu9Bw X-Received: by 2002:a65:6241:: with SMTP id q1mr4522192pgv.24.1560510944903; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:15:44 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1560510944; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TddC8xJ6Dr7pBjwXLIKUF1Ab6pHmay3rkWuvwW0g2n7oCc1s0mvjNRVmgmaatxywM9 p1DJb79xnctKH/zQHp6KfeftJ97bJPhjDpSKxe/l0w1W/hjVohuaXFrZ3mAjwGSHxRwS 1at9NC4LGtuGQbknkMM419KKSVIlh1tGef4sUZ4J77KZL7fd/RKC1end0R1nsYXJd9Yt 00uk7DDBqYYWGlnNurBp/aQEnbnc2I4BpzPgOSmTzraCzH2fHGcJ6It68Oyr1BcJ5a+R QNgH5zbPJN3oqpXPIqAOfOqSrz51FJtqgIT8hZyVAhwhSYQGDdWHm+wX3eIDg6TMpjeD Ki4w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=kGsvaCvQSv853oT5Wt897g4QszXSynzAJL9smkhzIpE=; b=myjEzo7xejS7IyP5GVI6CchA0HYFIg4jq+e/ykHuhspHO0d5PaJfiefEBwijCp80u7 8LPW5d0bIqlkjer+U2jtTXq9XD7f4KYwgGAG4Q+jrpdrJw7NSF3cLYGm/AQ/j220XAls 1RC4kmh+sMgxNeynks0r0XXBQ290tyTEAWdjYxaffZWU7zQEFAmUJUalEqT/9bLUU+Dd Qa/Z7nWiGJY+IAzDIkf0B8MZbcZ2q0mOvxGsC/eW4YYt0e3Y5qlTVw+jAXeWMowjYate hYNn0oqVTjBMbD17XKu4Km0sMEelTQe1uvLpsrzafrX4iocj3/Hb9qV9eJKND1zC+FYe 0R/Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="sAfN/Rgc"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 68si1939926ple.89.2019.06.14.04.15.27; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:15:44 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b="sAfN/Rgc"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727217AbfFNLPY (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:15:24 -0400 Received: from mail-io1-f68.google.com ([209.85.166.68]:41139 "EHLO mail-io1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727119AbfFNLPX (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Jun 2019 07:15:23 -0400 Received: by mail-io1-f68.google.com with SMTP id w25so4824008ioc.8 for ; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:15:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kGsvaCvQSv853oT5Wt897g4QszXSynzAJL9smkhzIpE=; b=sAfN/RgcVfbW/1Y66uS9fooOVxQuxZHUChyuQOf1L6D7MDey6eL0tRx27ZTMYLc/8/ nu4kVFEn2eolaITk2OScPN5HxCq/9WxnAcOZiiqd1Fxl5OvOSCnCGhaDylsnfsA6AL9T W1GlzQwds1c0N6QaraLSCs4Be0+1bhhiSOI/dvEzxjwdU1NBdDKS+mtgv12oCfxp9tSq 4o46t+lBTSsa/1R2Ly6zAJSyNRSy88IaGyudM8Q6v2mUMpgY6uwlsRlnJfgJ/ctFDLJo evWlqEMAB26eAE+FFSCPn+Ef9tKvGLl8XSHi5FGQvvgE88Xgy3kTBkHdHkVg5d32Mn6A u1Gg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kGsvaCvQSv853oT5Wt897g4QszXSynzAJL9smkhzIpE=; b=o5i87JY46mz5bEjVuVhuUjMVRlNfju2yY4cgFwiqZwWtSdmpzqGojLe/JgPKcMLcJH HtG0z9u9ITvuyFuKHbnWdu+Zsg+zTST0d7IT3KM3oNsyJts6/gK0gVp0mGiO/rt3FFq6 ZirIpD5N2c2Jm3rO8BJIb/1hcTD/E8pjhRRY3GbFCN8FdA8rgoijWTSHHRnLvIqkEX+0 LVAbmD78AyY/VqJ69L7G45If8eeRvAoVXsWeHYC6fMstDiAKbtBqqgdPAf9FIg2YjdlF HC+UXPrxlD6Xb8PTt74GORCUy2N5B9pDp0LqImj7Ai996xrxdWfNNemXx/hOVAHbBa56 XZ7Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXLEROuHVtzAFoseW7pV9XTEzmg+GlUKlFf2Oak/8ZmC+jPVFh8 gfyHv74m2WDgJkApV8gB7+fHfLNg8bh0VQVYa/BBVA== X-Received: by 2002:a02:ce37:: with SMTP id v23mr3106285jar.2.1560510922854; Fri, 14 Jun 2019 04:15:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190614111407.26725-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> In-Reply-To: <20190614111407.26725-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> From: Ard Biesheuvel Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2019 13:15:11 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] net: ipv4: move tcp_fastopen server side code to SipHash library To: "" , Eric Biggers Cc: "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , Herbert Xu , Eric Dumazet , "David S. Miller" , kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org (fix Eric's email address) On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 13:14, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Using a bare block cipher in non-crypto code is almost always a bad idea, > not only for security reasons (and we've seen some examples of this in > the kernel in the past), but also for performance reasons. > > In the TCP fastopen case, we call into the bare AES block cipher one or > two times (depending on whether the connection is IPv4 or IPv6). On most > systems, this results in a call chain such as > > crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ctx, dst, src) > crypto_cipher_crt(tfm)->cit_encrypt_one(crypto_cipher_tfm(tfm), ...); > aesni_encrypt > kernel_fpu_begin(); > aesni_enc(ctx, dst, src); // asm routine > kernel_fpu_end(); > > It is highly unlikely that the use of special AES instructions has a > benefit in this case, especially since we are doing the above twice > for IPv6 connections, instead of using a transform which can process > the entire input in one go. > > We could switch to the cbcmac(aes) shash, which would at least get > rid of the duplicated overhead in *some* cases (i.e., today, only > arm64 has an accelerated implementation of cbcmac(aes), while x86 will > end up using the generic cbcmac template wrapping the AES-NI cipher, > which basically ends up doing exactly the above). However, in the given > context, it makes more sense to use a light-weight MAC algorithm that > is more suitable for the purpose at hand, such as SipHash. > > Since the output size of SipHash already matches our chosen value for > TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_SIZE, and given that it accepts arbitrary input > sizes, this greatly simplifies the code as well. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel > --- > NOTE: This approach assumes that there are no external dependencies, > i.e., that there are no tools that implement the same algorithm > to calculate TCP fastopen cookies outside of the kernel. > > include/linux/tcp.h | 7 +-- > include/net/tcp.h | 1 - > net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c | 55 +++++++------------- > 3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/tcp.h b/include/linux/tcp.h > index 711361af9ce0..ce3319133632 100644 > --- a/include/linux/tcp.h > +++ b/include/linux/tcp.h > @@ -58,12 +58,7 @@ static inline unsigned int tcp_optlen(const struct sk_buff *skb) > > /* TCP Fast Open Cookie as stored in memory */ > struct tcp_fastopen_cookie { > - union { > - u8 val[TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_MAX]; > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) > - struct in6_addr addr; > -#endif > - }; > + u64 val[TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_MAX / sizeof(u64)]; > s8 len; > bool exp; /* In RFC6994 experimental option format */ > }; > diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h > index ac2f53fbfa6b..1630e61bd3e4 100644 > --- a/include/net/tcp.h > +++ b/include/net/tcp.h > @@ -1624,7 +1624,6 @@ bool tcp_fastopen_defer_connect(struct sock *sk, int *err); > > /* Fastopen key context */ > struct tcp_fastopen_context { > - struct crypto_cipher *tfm; > __u8 key[TCP_FASTOPEN_KEY_LENGTH]; > struct rcu_head rcu; > }; > diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c > index 018a48477355..4d3ccfa6b7ce 100644 > --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c > +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_fastopen.c > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ > #include > #include > #include > +#include > #include > #include > > @@ -37,8 +38,7 @@ static void tcp_fastopen_ctx_free(struct rcu_head *head) > { > struct tcp_fastopen_context *ctx = > container_of(head, struct tcp_fastopen_context, rcu); > - crypto_free_cipher(ctx->tfm); > - kfree(ctx); > + kzfree(ctx); > } > > void tcp_fastopen_destroy_cipher(struct sock *sk) > @@ -76,23 +76,9 @@ int tcp_fastopen_reset_cipher(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, > ctx = kmalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL); > if (!ctx) > return -ENOMEM; > - ctx->tfm = crypto_alloc_cipher("aes", 0, 0); > > - if (IS_ERR(ctx->tfm)) { > - err = PTR_ERR(ctx->tfm); > -error: kfree(ctx); > - pr_err("TCP: TFO aes cipher alloc error: %d\n", err); > - return err; > - } > - err = crypto_cipher_setkey(ctx->tfm, key, len); > - if (err) { > - pr_err("TCP: TFO cipher key error: %d\n", err); > - crypto_free_cipher(ctx->tfm); > - goto error; > - } > memcpy(ctx->key, key, len); > > - > spin_lock(&net->ipv4.tcp_fastopen_ctx_lock); > if (sk) { > q = &inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.fastopenq; > @@ -112,11 +98,14 @@ error: kfree(ctx); > } > > static bool __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(struct sock *sk, const void *path, > - struct tcp_fastopen_cookie *foc) > + int size, struct tcp_fastopen_cookie *foc) > { > struct tcp_fastopen_context *ctx; > bool ok = false; > > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(siphash_key_t) != TCP_FASTOPEN_KEY_LENGTH); > + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(u64) != TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_SIZE); > + > rcu_read_lock(); > > ctx = rcu_dereference(inet_csk(sk)->icsk_accept_queue.fastopenq.ctx); > @@ -124,7 +113,7 @@ static bool __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(struct sock *sk, const void *path, > ctx = rcu_dereference(sock_net(sk)->ipv4.tcp_fastopen_ctx); > > if (ctx) { > - crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ctx->tfm, foc->val, path); > + foc->val[0] = siphash(path, size, (siphash_key_t *)&ctx->key); > foc->len = TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_SIZE; > ok = true; > } > @@ -132,11 +121,8 @@ static bool __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(struct sock *sk, const void *path, > return ok; > } > > -/* Generate the fastopen cookie by doing aes128 encryption on both > - * the source and destination addresses. Pad 0s for IPv4 or IPv4-mapped-IPv6 > - * addresses. For the longer IPv6 addresses use CBC-MAC. > - * > - * XXX (TFO) - refactor when TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_SIZE != AES_BLOCK_SIZE. > +/* Generate the fastopen cookie by applying SipHash to both the source and > + * destination addresses. > */ > static bool tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(struct sock *sk, > struct request_sock *req, > @@ -146,25 +132,20 @@ static bool tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(struct sock *sk, > if (req->rsk_ops->family == AF_INET) { > const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(syn); > > - __be32 path[4] = { iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0, 0 }; > - return __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(sk, path, foc); > + return __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(sk, &iph->saddr, > + sizeof(iph->saddr) + > + sizeof(iph->daddr), > + foc); > } > > -#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) > - if (req->rsk_ops->family == AF_INET6) { > + if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) && req->rsk_ops->family == AF_INET6) { > const struct ipv6hdr *ip6h = ipv6_hdr(syn); > - struct tcp_fastopen_cookie tmp; > - > - if (__tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(sk, &ip6h->saddr, &tmp)) { > - struct in6_addr *buf = &tmp.addr; > - int i; > > - for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) > - buf->s6_addr32[i] ^= ip6h->daddr.s6_addr32[i]; > - return __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(sk, buf, foc); > - } > + return __tcp_fastopen_cookie_gen(sk, &ip6h->saddr, > + sizeof(ip6h->saddr) + > + sizeof(ip6h->daddr), > + foc); > } > -#endif > return false; > } > > -- > 2.20.1 >