Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp3771721ybh; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx7EJ1WVg9qwIyXEKL+aLiPFuvEki/7pPR0GOS3XD83hUQENIYJZrZN/el+Ci7Qikj7ZZHk X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8752:: with SMTP id g18mr2230788pfo.201.1565078584898; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565078584; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=bq66JE7YgWeyfdbkTP3GC+02zqqVCNwfIcSQCpCK1+3GBYUMLGoKwP37jMjtgCdyHq eNbh73bjcj1PuxWqkFCqBu+TAqSc3LYPEklWplQUj3MPlvWxgaWo+8h9XSld6pOiK6xP xWw65DqHTwzckEe3TAwCm14fbArmKkpHI+JuUNgsXUQiRQ3tC1eMXCBJIQ2lRxueJbu+ 9qSKu2wEBKCK8Z4/OKi9Ycj0NAUgy9H5Q/ryKyzYpLnJgIiYK04HlxjEVEWUxdWtthrh HVSDqH4sBW4KXYPvtTrinZPCZL4e1onmAfSIDjGwuX2XlkjD7723UuNaPPAMTd1M32nm zyEA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date :subject:cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=Qm6JmV3kYksXWkeHC8pJWnKVfNR1ILujwNkPpqX8u58=; b=XzfcOj+UALPOuWqCrP8HKyWDk3HQEv+/JY3h5i6SMxfOf0Ilmi2P9DtnLmaBkdMH2v uiVdEyIJKrsNmo1Y5QdrBau5ktgbeXNE6cO+G76LMFed4Q8zwNZ+151qe1hnaOMSzE1C p5PwVrYw0QzaOSsle8p0HNhL5jcEgmdGunxxnYQ0vLujIuvngzBsJMmP/2PsxdbW9spr xV8uSQOiNqdoPypR/jmeSEKcmHafrTWw52O2sMeADrjjGmoq4H5hX8h6FmmYoxnbLIMr M8o7Ulyh339c8saxOLtMDzJFChoZPDhiFYX8sWqULfEngClnZ0zS74LwGEGJHut59+dX eG8Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=KO+jyoMY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id n75si14592833pjc.27.2019.08.06.01.02.50; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:03:04 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=KO+jyoMY; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732160AbfHFICt (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:02:49 -0400 Received: from mail-wr1-f65.google.com ([209.85.221.65]:40962 "EHLO mail-wr1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732122AbfHFICt (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Aug 2019 04:02:49 -0400 Received: by mail-wr1-f65.google.com with SMTP id c2so83657236wrm.8 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:02:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=Qm6JmV3kYksXWkeHC8pJWnKVfNR1ILujwNkPpqX8u58=; b=KO+jyoMY9ilq+waDLre4wpNqq5bKuzook/vdC1KlJZH8sM8Xr0/2PXSLIkBEXb88+G /FNvoKUgUdmlI2Dkh9Ppgs/BFXyxmZBEjb5ySCKUc9nqoUIAPKtwR/xdPXPnaY5/LqHZ +RWkYDUar7b5P3zL+bZxI2YOdjZggxbk0T6Q7AYB85IPrZo+/JCl9xvNy/uc598h9tyO 4v1/GeZMfKP3rZyAuNuIODNX4HPPuHkyp2TpFmGXCaAi9y6wqmqs9EHEP/Odu4slwf8P p1I24ENa85XU5QBYPWtQhQWo/FitJ3sz8EQriWOkImaQpKRM16C/XczKEjk7G6DbMUJu pvAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=Qm6JmV3kYksXWkeHC8pJWnKVfNR1ILujwNkPpqX8u58=; b=SCP6YnW22rllWfiFFtXSjIBMy2CLTi1qWm2mKMzxLF1cDKC8ZW0fnBV+GOMs58KY2Z AfUtUwGHmPVLhB7ao5t3+uUAwUu4PnZR7YAjb8OgJMPePyzRvg9pLxdwA7qGVTNlZBQz 7vM+oOdAYx116GZs3p+sBc0Ue90mQ4uCtMilSQHi3O4niPkpWIOdAijItDsbO+AG1Dgd drR/XsiyDAgwRisaJ9XQVT94Vtv3M3ZKbqjqUaE3dabzF/9PffK2JNWRA3tqLiNZUykE ySczIsi9s/Pv6HeKPOhTQYNgZGO/8T5588n0y1O892eFXtTdqNTJUEvDup9gqKpkeZZv GYuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWBlfci3lQhJFHewgPxNcFsbptqBbqHH6tKWA6Bwej4bMcQAL5X X3rw4ETa9DZGHkF4nnqE57KJBtekhXFeiw== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:5507:: with SMTP id b7mr3023744wrv.35.1565078566677; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:02:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a02:587:a407:da00:582f:8334:9cd9:7241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g12sm123785475wrv.9.2019.08.06.01.02.43 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 01:02:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, ebiggers@kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [RFC PATCH 2/2] md/dm-crypt - switch to AES library for EBOIV Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2019 11:02:34 +0300 Message-Id: <20190806080234.27998-3-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20190806080234.27998-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> References: <20190806080234.27998-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org The EBOIV IV mode reuses the same AES encryption key that is used for encrypting the data, and uses it to perform a single block encryption of the byte offset to produce the IV. Since table-based AES is known to be susceptible to known-plaintext attacks on the key, and given that the same key is used to encrypt the byte offset (which is known to an attacker), we should be careful not to permit arbitrary instantiations where the allocated AES cipher is provided by aes-generic or other table-based drivers that are known to be time variant and thus susceptible to this kind of attack. Instead, let's switch to the new AES library, which has a D-cache footprint that is only 1/32th of the generic AES driver, and which contains some mitigations to reduce the timing variance even further. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 33 ++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c index a5e8d5bc1581..4650ab4b9415 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ #include #include #include +#include #include #include #include @@ -121,7 +122,7 @@ struct iv_tcw_private { }; struct iv_eboiv_private { - struct crypto_cipher *tfm; + struct crypto_aes_ctx aes_ctx; }; /* @@ -851,16 +852,12 @@ static void crypt_iv_eboiv_dtr(struct crypt_config *cc) { struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; - crypto_free_cipher(eboiv->tfm); - eboiv->tfm = NULL; + memset(eboiv, 0, sizeof(*eboiv)); } static int crypt_iv_eboiv_ctr(struct crypt_config *cc, struct dm_target *ti, const char *opts) { - struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; - struct crypto_cipher *tfm; - if (test_bit(CRYPT_MODE_INTEGRITY_AEAD, &cc->cipher_flags) || strcmp("cbc(aes)", crypto_tfm_alg_name(crypto_skcipher_tfm(any_tfm(cc))))) { @@ -868,20 +865,6 @@ static int crypt_iv_eboiv_ctr(struct crypt_config *cc, struct dm_target *ti, return -EINVAL; } - tfm = crypto_alloc_cipher(cc->cipher, 0, 0); - if (IS_ERR(tfm)) { - ti->error = "Error allocating crypto tfm for EBOIV"; - return PTR_ERR(tfm); - } - - if (crypto_cipher_blocksize(tfm) != cc->iv_size) { - ti->error = "Block size of EBOIV cipher does " - "not match IV size of block cipher"; - crypto_free_cipher(tfm); - return -EINVAL; - } - - eboiv->tfm = tfm; return 0; } @@ -890,7 +873,7 @@ static int crypt_iv_eboiv_init(struct crypt_config *cc) struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; int err; - err = crypto_cipher_setkey(eboiv->tfm, cc->key, cc->key_size); + err = aes_expandkey(&eboiv->aes_ctx, cc->key, cc->key_size); if (err) return err; @@ -899,8 +882,10 @@ static int crypt_iv_eboiv_init(struct crypt_config *cc) static int crypt_iv_eboiv_wipe(struct crypt_config *cc) { - /* Called after cc->key is set to random key in crypt_wipe() */ - return crypt_iv_eboiv_init(cc); + struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; + + memset(eboiv, 0, sizeof(*eboiv)); + return 0; } static int crypt_iv_eboiv_gen(struct crypt_config *cc, u8 *iv, @@ -910,7 +895,7 @@ static int crypt_iv_eboiv_gen(struct crypt_config *cc, u8 *iv, memset(iv, 0, cc->iv_size); *(__le64 *)iv = cpu_to_le64(dmreq->iv_sector * cc->sector_size); - crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(eboiv->tfm, iv, iv); + aes_encrypt(&eboiv->aes_ctx, iv, iv); return 0; } -- 2.17.1