Received: by 2002:a25:b794:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id n20csp5014426ybh; Tue, 6 Aug 2019 22:51:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqweCVAXeEl48kueQZGi5zXYQD4ZfNVBKP/Gj4TkdiQcOZD5nDt8V8me/8d/IMIA9Ur0/sln X-Received: by 2002:aa7:9f1c:: with SMTP id g28mr7484817pfr.81.1565157063097; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:51:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1565157063; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=JSSzZrlzjR/zInC7M8CF466Yu7CsjP7rD1u98NpJBIZW9pdRbzakzDRDp/o7ua0ChT 35fvaZlR3JzpY60CzOsFYwOGA+5zdq0vxY7E/l8W7kq4oKzV9vptX/c8trKoRqtrloSN npMTp9POTgHHlVtVie5upFQKE8e/SI7zTrV8VVCcQ0qoYWme08OhUaNYZUkKGyWuwcJu umvXtLCRc0x5/J8BhShBQGoVI4DiYzh5dazW4wk6k8fR05/rF/i4nH1GiZtUYgIGFTRh 2sh0++rnTsvhw35Ntal7zNItN/pAPJQyUa/7PJ5fB9tS4voNZ1e5TvTiPdGEge7P1tUC 3ABQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from :dkim-signature; bh=CXyjD2LOgdjBHwvd9Z5OLX5HdLR1iysQUf/zzqY6Pg0=; b=OcOv+qfYCC3vktw5PXq7u38Fr43owAlYYKm30KdDRIc64Xjmba85ePMmgid8NoMyiV g8LTXFt79UhH86MxrYqaVfm4Gtgh3dI0i4rveNClwLVjBMlfAULvtEjWu5zAVVB4Fm5x L1nggKM21CIF+TaH6hBP+duF6U41YebYhOvMYup0NSqfO46p8wOjujU101b5lguN52/I Y7Pq5aM6ZtGTXxuUZjTW665KekFqfBc9oCC2TmVupWETl3kFDiC6DAFE3l5EseToQVVU ymDpOyna2Jm3y2VimunbFAXuqnIkwitDzEktWdKQR+ewbf6nQYir3S44GVuA220gIL7M olfA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=lMdIxIi6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id g1si44347143plj.194.2019.08.06.22.50.36; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:51:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@linaro.org header.s=google header.b=lMdIxIi6; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=linaro.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725995AbfHGFue (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 01:50:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:55811 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725794AbfHGFue (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Aug 2019 01:50:34 -0400 Received: by mail-wm1-f67.google.com with SMTP id f72so169517wmf.5 for ; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:50:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=CXyjD2LOgdjBHwvd9Z5OLX5HdLR1iysQUf/zzqY6Pg0=; b=lMdIxIi6yJdoqNFjkK2obWzPaZeIBmGxoeEOHIr1pzD9k61SjXsh8zh4Nm6xWfws3S 0ANsw1PpWH0aQgvkRH2+kfNcAiS3xokvUz7g4ZxBCGkHJBDI3+KCGptK/+RFBkQdw1cX fySnCvJD19wnY4s9FX9yeFQgKm3NUEXBumMWanotIp11zUhCTJdFFnhDFIt84ttQ4Fby 0fSjwFMzLdmMRUJWAR9IG4D7y4hcF4wUpeWwdF2ahvwNVLDBmVJGycNr8qC6KjlDDaVq /3UuW+MLvfDwRPjHCytTyLlKaY1fi670gSxm+r9NvBzn7hOg1IlPOnzaIyYj81xjkIHn sfYA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=CXyjD2LOgdjBHwvd9Z5OLX5HdLR1iysQUf/zzqY6Pg0=; b=QtDNAGOGRHFs3AVWvX6mk5Asf+nhgVQ6TdYwuprNG1Wc/GVHeX2ym8PS/UzS1Mtuth ohGv5i2h4TlbaJl8W5mUz0TVJzB/JxHAF7QoC4EqvX/YMa8fXzUjrX+7fVYNn2Tune+5 YLb+vCWGsujEgM9LWmbr2iwpFrQvc8wiVsvB6USpg7SzJ6qTdn+QBq2A/1BSIbme9pS1 ayHVeY90QJsT4YRynZlT8bu/qfJJ9nI8vOfuVm2Vdwtcc4OYGnv0+qqPZBHkuT0Dz9Kx yaSoe6MpTg6FShDFwvq8cp22hYgLpRE7XSHmX9yVZ+1GCwEwf+AyaoYXWMkJqK2zf6d6 nbQQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXUvTcHps+i2UHHzrN0CSITJSOMBVyozDj15rIVfcKeRON388Xx YC3vi4yNWxM/fidjoDPGIOc+w/tNEARabg== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:9889:: with SMTP id a131mr1664005wme.22.1565157031209; Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:50:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([2a02:587:a407:da00:582f:8334:9cd9:7241]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm2659891wrc.35.2019.08.06.22.50.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 06 Aug 2019 22:50:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Ard Biesheuvel To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, ebiggers@kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com, dm-devel@redhat.com, gmazyland@gmail.com, Ard Biesheuvel Subject: [RFC PATCH v2] md/dm-crypt - reuse eboiv skcipher for IV generation Date: Wed, 7 Aug 2019 08:50:22 +0300 Message-Id: <20190807055022.15551-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Instead of instantiating a separate cipher to perform the encryption needed to produce the IV, reuse the skcipher used for the block data and invoke it one additional time for each block to encrypt a zero vector and use the output as the IV. For CBC mode, this is equivalent to using the bare block cipher, but without the risk of ending up with a non-time invariant implementation of AES when the skcipher itself is time variant (e.g., arm64 without Crypto Extensions has a NEON based time invariant implementation of cbc(aes) but no time invariant implementation of the core cipher other than aes-ti, which is not enabled by default) This approach is a compromise between dm-crypt API flexibility and reducing dependence on parts of the crypto API that should not usually be exposed to other subsystems, such as the bare cipher API. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel --- drivers/md/dm-crypt.c | 70 ++++++++++++++----------------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c index d5216bcc4649..48cd76c88d77 100644 --- a/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c +++ b/drivers/md/dm-crypt.c @@ -120,10 +120,6 @@ struct iv_tcw_private { u8 *whitening; }; -struct iv_eboiv_private { - struct crypto_cipher *tfm; -}; - /* * Crypt: maps a linear range of a block device * and encrypts / decrypts at the same time. @@ -163,7 +159,6 @@ struct crypt_config { struct iv_benbi_private benbi; struct iv_lmk_private lmk; struct iv_tcw_private tcw; - struct iv_eboiv_private eboiv; } iv_gen_private; u64 iv_offset; unsigned int iv_size; @@ -847,65 +842,47 @@ static int crypt_iv_random_gen(struct crypt_config *cc, u8 *iv, return 0; } -static void crypt_iv_eboiv_dtr(struct crypt_config *cc) -{ - struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; - - crypto_free_cipher(eboiv->tfm); - eboiv->tfm = NULL; -} - static int crypt_iv_eboiv_ctr(struct crypt_config *cc, struct dm_target *ti, const char *opts) { - struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; - struct crypto_cipher *tfm; - - tfm = crypto_alloc_cipher(cc->cipher, 0, 0); - if (IS_ERR(tfm)) { - ti->error = "Error allocating crypto tfm for EBOIV"; - return PTR_ERR(tfm); + if (test_bit(CRYPT_MODE_INTEGRITY_AEAD, &cc->cipher_flags)) { + ti->error = "AEAD transforms not supported for EBOIV"; + return -EINVAL; } - if (crypto_cipher_blocksize(tfm) != cc->iv_size) { + if (crypto_skcipher_blocksize(any_tfm(cc)) != cc->iv_size) { ti->error = "Block size of EBOIV cipher does " "not match IV size of block cipher"; - crypto_free_cipher(tfm); return -EINVAL; } - eboiv->tfm = tfm; return 0; } -static int crypt_iv_eboiv_init(struct crypt_config *cc) +static int crypt_iv_eboiv_gen(struct crypt_config *cc, u8 *iv, + struct dm_crypt_request *dmreq) { - struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; + u8 buf[MAX_CIPHER_BLOCKSIZE] __aligned(__alignof__(__le64)); + struct skcipher_request *req; + struct scatterlist src, dst; + struct crypto_wait wait; int err; - err = crypto_cipher_setkey(eboiv->tfm, cc->key, cc->key_size); - if (err) - return err; - - return 0; -} - -static int crypt_iv_eboiv_wipe(struct crypt_config *cc) -{ - /* Called after cc->key is set to random key in crypt_wipe() */ - return crypt_iv_eboiv_init(cc); -} + req = skcipher_request_alloc(any_tfm(cc), GFP_KERNEL | GFP_NOFS); + if (!req) + return -ENOMEM; -static int crypt_iv_eboiv_gen(struct crypt_config *cc, u8 *iv, - struct dm_crypt_request *dmreq) -{ - struct iv_eboiv_private *eboiv = &cc->iv_gen_private.eboiv; + memset(buf, 0, cc->iv_size); + *(__le64 *)buf = cpu_to_le64(dmreq->iv_sector * cc->sector_size); - memset(iv, 0, cc->iv_size); - *(__le64 *)iv = cpu_to_le64(dmreq->iv_sector * cc->sector_size); - crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(eboiv->tfm, iv, iv); + sg_init_one(&src, page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)), cc->iv_size); + sg_init_one(&dst, iv, cc->iv_size); + skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &src, &dst, cc->iv_size, buf); + skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, crypto_req_done, &wait); + err = crypto_wait_req(crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req), &wait); + skcipher_request_free(req); - return 0; + return err; } static const struct crypt_iv_operations crypt_iv_plain_ops = { @@ -962,9 +939,6 @@ static struct crypt_iv_operations crypt_iv_random_ops = { static struct crypt_iv_operations crypt_iv_eboiv_ops = { .ctr = crypt_iv_eboiv_ctr, - .dtr = crypt_iv_eboiv_dtr, - .init = crypt_iv_eboiv_init, - .wipe = crypt_iv_eboiv_wipe, .generator = crypt_iv_eboiv_gen }; -- 2.17.1