Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190906184551.17858-1-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>
 <20190906184551.17858-4-clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com> <20190907040116.lib532o2eqt4qnvv@flea>
 <20190911183158.GA8264@Red> <20190912093737.s6iu63sdncij2qib@localhost.localdomain>
 <CAGb2v678WGQm5PNy8GhOTpz+fYeLP3k0dnR0F00yyZpSRcA4yA@mail.gmail.com> <20190912203301.is4ubixhk64dl5t7@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: <20190912203301.is4ubixhk64dl5t7@localhost.localdomain>
From:   Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Date:   Thu, 12 Sep 2019 21:37:17 +0100
Message-ID: <CAGb2v646YkM93BAo=hrpL+tgDU-JJ49-uMCMGECUbouoJrpg=w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] dt-bindings: crypto: Add DT bindings documentation
 for sun8i-ce Crypto Engine
To:     Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>
Cc:     Corentin Labbe <clabbe.montjoie@gmail.com>,
        David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
        devicetree <devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        linux-sunxi <linux-sunxi@googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 9:33 PM Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2019 at 09:26:27PM +0100, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> > > >
> > > >   clock-names:
> > > >     items:
> > > >       - const: ahb
> > > >       - const: mod
> > > >       - const: mbus
> > >
> > > And here as well
> > >
> > > Something I missed earlier though was that we've tried to unify as
> > > much as possible the ahb / apb / axi clocks around the bus name, it
> > > would be great if you could do it.
> >
> > I think we also want to standardize "mbus" as "dram"?
>
> Do we? The only user so far seems to be sun9i-de, while mbus has more
> users. I don't really care though, both mbus and dram are pretty
> generic to me. What makes you prefer dram over mbus?

Argh... it's actually "ram" we use the most. Both "dram" and "mbus"
have only one instance each.

ChenYu