Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:06:42 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc:     linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 01/12] tpm-buf: move from static inlines to real
 functions
Message-ID: <20190920140642.GB9578@linux.intel.com>
References: <1568031408.6613.29.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <1568031476.6613.30.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
 <20190920140459.GA9578@linux.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20190920140459.GA9578@linux.intel.com>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 05:06:15PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:17:56PM +0100, James Bottomley wrote:
> > This separates out the old tpm_buf_... handling functions from static
> > inlines in tpm.h and makes them their own tpm-buf.c file.  This is a
> > precursor so we can add new functions for other TPM type handling
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
> 
> What about TPM_BUF_2B that gets added in this commit?

Probably just a glitch in rebasing/squashing?

/Jarkko