Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp513359ybg; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwMc9HhEB+u1qNgfc/t2HW7H8UwMrWvfT3WtEURZ9cm8rAB1kdO279hvScccPam17re3BJU X-Received: by 2002:aa7:df0b:: with SMTP id c11mr8766978edy.101.1571393982171; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1571393982; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=SB7yE2+AIVBQv1adB8LAB6CBBzxBmayHS4dW+HEJo8M+9NeAnPD2xGBagGYJsVxTan 4Ul7c+S76Ynziiea03Y0zGUMM+dHtKLBnAcH9kZHhXynIxHnIioEEaQIWviGQHUFEgG2 5WKIOtcE/CrskB3uuxxgRkR9f0n3HGyTmTES1vHFgjdWX6KRsTKnckeUI6PjyfIlpM/9 a7KeR6LXBhjCu6Chl4ELT768TPTtZXybH41bCW/WHA4LO9x3kJ3HfEMrSWYwnGJlLtP5 tvDgVFFVIV8/0T5p5lIWM6PF54MQlPJVKoFVXkHemlQpnKQ6b/XmOG2ByLOhkNzT29au ESzg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=oeXUFRyla+VX0viXj45H0xlw4xEHSjKcNfbJSjvNI1Y=; b=CnS8TwkF0zWFTMahUiLV1+NbODZNUOtdUfSGZkx24f/lxAUaBqFvWxzpOxdR1OUFpx ndyBi4LKJ4GeZbliXBZ1p/qbFfbt83VzczFTGe7I9tY+rBQM9K1tB07vZTTEAXpB9Vde iRtizMv5RcooHrkn4c08C/HVpUYTGQyhWC/lmgvJgtjqp/MSE6k5vGmsW+IGkBqrt1Pc FV/OjCXaZQwIlnlLFvTdJ9fDaC663u55viGot7TKlSGp2aidcG/VuuEWAE0vNmlxLh/g eIdjv1QhthjyDY7YzP3r7A8a41a24WVKsgcpn0ztxfzz0Le0IiqSdZdBiriwKT5QSeiG Ypfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id o14si3000297ejc.421.2019.10.18.03.19.17; Fri, 18 Oct 2019 03:19:42 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727285AbfJQJAl (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:00:41 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:62792 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2408409AbfJQJAl (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:00:41 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x9H8xAvh084248 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:00:40 -0400 Received: from e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.97]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2vpk59mhrv-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 05:00:39 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:00:37 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.197) by e06smtp01.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.131) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Thu, 17 Oct 2019 10:00:36 +0100 Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.62]) by b06cxnps4075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x9H90YtO22937850 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:00:35 GMT Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F2CAE068; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:00:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A4AAE045; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:00:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from osiris (unknown [9.152.212.85]) by d06av26.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 09:00:34 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:00:33 +0200 From: Heiko Carstens To: Herbert Xu Cc: Eric Biggers , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, Vasily Gorbik , Christian Borntraeger , Harald Freudenberger Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH 0/3] crypto: s390 - convert to skcipher API References: <20191012201809.160500-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20191016080103.GA4267@osiris> <20191016123507.GA16265@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191016123507.GA16265@gondor.apana.org.au> X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19101709-4275-0000-0000-00000372E389 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19101709-4276-0000-0000-00003885FB5E Message-Id: <20191017090033.GA6087@osiris> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-10-17_04:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=876 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1908290000 definitions=main-1910170081 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 11:35:07PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote: > > > Eric Biggers (3): > > > crypto: s390/aes - convert to skcipher API > > > crypto: s390/paes - convert to skcipher API > > > crypto: s390/des - convert to skcipher API > > > > > > arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c | 609 ++++++++++++++--------------------- > > > arch/s390/crypto/des_s390.c | 419 ++++++++++-------------- > > > arch/s390/crypto/paes_s390.c | 414 ++++++++++-------------- > > > 3 files changed, 580 insertions(+), 862 deletions(-) > > > > Herbert, should these go upstream via the s390 or crypto tree? > > It would be best to go via the crypto tree since any future patches > to remove blkcipher/ablkcipher would depend on these patches. Ok, fully agreed. Thanks!