Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4084936ybg; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwZ+5wQeSrO0MyF9985frFhuLhvZ5gRHp9nBuD6VJG7V6Qg8ZaOHUCSZRSfqTGHsQctlNHx X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:e0b:: with SMTP id l11mr5175047eji.245.1572033962754; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572033962; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=rPM439HcA0fCoExdUW/0jfT13vr9CwgyzwKOqK0Q54eJIMVUDY5bVN/n2CFn9XiJAq 7g8W7KFpdVFLeI+NmzHCSO608D16f4H2KTNnGcVxLtgoVbErsV4CxCK3f+ZJjqdfq7PU mAQAF1epLIIIDOMQdBut8yBOT2sBxFwpzTLTWW/22nrrPNOp64FkMKOwhByGIvh56vxh 0vMOjX6XnIXIVvBk7o5+KzgkHSN1lNmspWRoWAeMC0GP0VTFKftGaN5ujcd4vdTPZJKG UUhtMEhpvRH38lTpxuEY/mZzMwQqjF0Ph6sFtFZFcAR0ewijJ9INbrSCy0afdlUlFXAl 5uvg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding :content-language:in-reply-to:mime-version:user-agent:date :message-id:from:references:cc:to:subject:dkim-signature; bh=+AzN6QW8Y9V9KQdYzGUqYfgRbdiMJlLbgEwmAB6P/78=; b=vZyIoTfXNk16zFMe5s46C4Yq30/OwR6iGrWs8UyxsdV3LDuqUf2FgyVh0XnNnSP++/ yAX6x8b2wKWICYq7w0kop0k1AtAeBJ6+VDauOOQkE6e5HN69WtUImNIvhEIYfL8TDg4y t6wOazd91OkAlb/e/2qZr0LQjk1Il1GdWNAg68vPZTcZovYqlzt7B3ZMU72Yv4mfbEyN 61SdiBO5LGn1b6mQSbq+9pUqxg2K6mMsP7gBOS2eDXTbsPYL8T5ONGzjb6WNtbz4fcTC +M+Qz79QkCr8d4YdXn+Ph9Rj85owSRc/Z1vc4CtcPmCMUhaDyzfAOQOw61maai7SXEjw K6+Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b="GVNJe/qy"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q5si1745793eju.387.2019.10.25.13.05.37; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 13:06:02 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@ti.com header.s=ti-com-17Q1 header.b="GVNJe/qy"; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=QUARANTINE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ti.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439621AbfJYMSZ (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:18:25 -0400 Received: from fllv0015.ext.ti.com ([198.47.19.141]:37060 "EHLO fllv0015.ext.ti.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2436740AbfJYMSY (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:18:24 -0400 Received: from fllv0034.itg.ti.com ([10.64.40.246]) by fllv0015.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9PCIAAB097511; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:18:10 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1572005890; bh=+AzN6QW8Y9V9KQdYzGUqYfgRbdiMJlLbgEwmAB6P/78=; h=Subject:To:CC:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=GVNJe/qymU047YRv+aTEq5SjDKaOQ3kDyFLM0M8vuM6Ggf1mh1raMGzlb1Gsn2D2c E/AW1kbD/9rorjIUQKuLnCtpeD+y4rVsXdIAxnHPTXyvYw7bcQKkmt1ATIsALgSTsf RDOMq6OPv/YTENR50VIvS/sjAtYztCJUzDNPjS2E= Received: from DFLE114.ent.ti.com (dfle114.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.35]) by fllv0034.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id x9PCIAEZ024029 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:18:10 -0500 Received: from DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) by DFLE114.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.35) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:17:59 -0500 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE110.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.31) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:17:59 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id x9PCI7A8025611; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 07:18:08 -0500 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] crypto: omap fixes towards 5.5 To: Ard Biesheuvel CC: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" , , linux-arm-kernel References: <20191017122549.4634-1-t-kristo@ti.com> <8f97d690-a88a-55cb-eb67-206e01873d94@ti.com> From: Tero Kristo Message-ID: <359434e9-3289-2982-edc1-b93e76c28700@ti.com> Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 15:18:06 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On 25/10/2019 15:05, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On Fri, 25 Oct 2019 at 13:56, Tero Kristo wrote: >> >> On 25/10/2019 14:55, Tero Kristo wrote: >>> On 25/10/2019 14:33, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >>>> On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 at 14:26, Tero Kristo wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> This series fixes a number of bugs with omap crypto implementation. >>>>> These have become evident with the changes to the cryptomanager, where >>>>> it adds some new test cases and modifies some existing, namely the split >>>>> update tests. Also, while fixing the cryptomanager induced bugs, some >>>>> other surfaced with tcrypt/IPSec tests, so fixed them aswell. >>>>> >>>>> Patch #9 is against crypto core modifying the crypto_wait_req >>>>> common API to have a timeout for it also, currently it waits forever >>>>> and it is kind of difficult to see what test fails with crypto manager. >>>>> This is not really needed for anything, but it is kind of nice to have >>>>> (makes debugging easier.) >>>>> >>>>> This series has been tested on top of 5.4-rc2, with following setups, >>>>> on AM57xx-beagle-x15 board: >>>>> >>>>> - crypto manager self tests >>>>> - tcrypt performance test >>>>> - ipsec test with strongswan >>>>> >>>>> This series depends on the skcipher API switch patch from Ard Biesheuvel >>>>> [1]. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Hi Tero, >>>> >>>> On my BeagleBone White, I am hitting the following issues after >>>> applying these patches: >>>> >>>> [ 7.493903] alg: skcipher: ecb-aes-omap encryption unexpectedly >>>> succeeded on test vector "random: len=531 klen=32"; >>>> expected_error=-22, cfg="random: inplace may_sleep use_finup >>>> src_divs=[44.72%@+4028, 14.70%@alignmask+3, 19.45%@+4070, >>>> 21.13%@+2728]" >>>> [ 7.651103] alg: skcipher: cbc-aes-omap encryption unexpectedly >>>> succeeded on test vector "random: len=1118 klen=32"; >>>> expected_error=-22, cfg="random: may_sleep use_final >>>> src_divs=[41.87%@+31, 58.13%@+2510]" >>>> >>>> These are simply a result of the ECB and CBC implementations not >>>> returning -EINVAL when the input is not a multiple of the block size. >>>> >>>> [ 7.845527] alg: skcipher: blocksize for ctr-aes-omap (16) doesn't >>>> match generic impl (1) >>>> >>>> This means cra_blocksize is not set to 1 as it should. If your driver >>>> uses the skcipher walk API, it should set the walksize to >>>> AES_BLOCK_SIZE to ensure that the input is handled correctly. If you >>>> don't, then you can disregard that part. >>>> >>>> [ 8.306491] alg: aead: gcm-aes-omap setauthsize unexpectedly >>>> succeeded on test vector "random: alen=3 plen=31 authsize=6 klen=9"; >>>> expected_error=-22 >>>> >>>> Another missing sanity check. GCM only permits certain authsizes. >>>> >>>> [ 9.074703] omap_crypto_copy_sgs: Couldn't allocate pages for >>>> unaligned cases. >>>> >>>> This is not a bug, but I'm not sure if the below is related or not. >>>> >>>> I'll preserve the binaries, in case you need me to objdump anything. >>> >>> What are these tests you are executing? For me, the testmgr self test >>> suite is passing just fine. Any extra tests you have enabled somehow? >>> > > I enabled CONFIG_CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS, which enables a bunch of > fuzz tests of the offloaded algorithms against the generic > implementations. Ahha I see, let me give that a shot locally. I have so far only been testing with the standard suite. > >>> I am also running full test on different board though (am57xx), I >>> haven't been explicitly running anything on am335x. >> >> Oh, and btw, did you try without my series? I think the selftests are >> failing rather miserably without them... >> > > No, I just tried a branch with mine and your patches applied. Could you give it a shot without the CRYPTO_MANAGER_EXTRA_TESTS, that should pass with my series, and fail without? -Tero -- Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki