Received: by 2002:a25:d7c1:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id o184csp4048599ybg; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:06:03 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx8JEqF/Fog9XZ+IhnI+mnw5qXD6M5z0kZTuH/YKWd7AqNZi8O3513dJnnCFxxIUnVXDEVR X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:40f3:: with SMTP id no3mr1881871ejb.95.1572336363128; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:06:03 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1572336363; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=A3TCg6IwIBnvRp70AM27qAUNMdRbvhqqODSb38Hi5r9P0ruqm2s6iOFc7FFKrmcFZ5 TFHtHm+VYDHQHc0RHj0SdsqsYhrHpfD1TsDFrR7od9kiigUt6Gru+RBR502JvOgOVs4c aux+3+yDEf7kcKAEYmIGqMVmtjePtW+IAoVhGaEASAO/DxQ9ENV5Yw0VwxINz8ajgwG0 XMoRtfPHfZ/0PHz5dp8SnobOdrGgWaaKIf2bCS61DFmVw3hik+CfqwZaJbibXOPYzIY8 WNqotKvWCfam/KfpvHghXXWkm1iN5o5oAkTXnh+LA8V46RHHztuKWzIwF5WHOkojykev +DdA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :organization:references:in-reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:from :date; bh=sng7qWtpKBPFD04LCBiPXEsP7k5nHuzoNhXc5RS2y+A=; b=KkABWQQ2bZ8OhTVJeyKW0paIuKqKKoPPAUSxn+4mUle3LxTGChFsSYXOVi/p1TEtDy 3dvMIXY3oQms/sap870V6AWnrXt9DgAQ+0yVnthqMYV2q65ZmT3uTvJso4nnr2+KYDv0 7gkcWkKiHOnQSg4ZY8HswxbnTc/mK1B1vZeYOuydgb9jKBE2ngqffYTvFkXegHBeqjat AMI8UvbTjXk7Bp/3VPhWOo+Caeuy4ex1T/PXqABnQ1zyDpWM71ZVagg4qmgBE+QN0PgJ A3hq6VdEI5WhbOelBUJHfPAypwkOLMANy9WGYWg0skdL+KAcQW0NbX9SLNE4oZ/CpsR9 zzPQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id t8si7589099edd.373.2019.10.29.01.05.26; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:06:03 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727562AbfJ2IAf (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:00:35 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:42020 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726233AbfJ2IAe (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 04:00:34 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30A994FA; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:00:30 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 02:00:27 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Changbin Du Cc: Jani Nikula , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, Matthew Wilcox , Thomas Zimmermann Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] kernel-doc: rename the kernel-doc directive 'functions' to 'identifiers' Message-ID: <20191029020027.516a6bce@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <20191029003120.llve32crfw63ovpw@mail.google.com> References: <20191020131717.28990-1-changbin.du@gmail.com> <20191024121940.1d6a64df@lwn.net> <87woctb9cj.fsf@intel.com> <20191025144802.uixg2crhw6h7gghq@mail.google.com> <87v9s99q9l.fsf@intel.com> <20191029003120.llve32crfw63ovpw@mail.google.com> Organization: LWN.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 29 Oct 2019 08:31:22 +0800 Changbin Du wrote: > Here python is different from C. Both empty string and None are False in python. > Note such condition is common in python. Treating both as a False value is reasonably common. Treating them elsewhere in the same code block as separate values is less so; that's the part I would prefer to avoid. Thanks, jon