Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp1913693ybv; Thu, 6 Feb 2020 12:09:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz1ZfocfPNeR+Wx7GYBV+uw1Eq56q5naVfY8PSeD7If3YzgHI8h3yxb2+ueThlAUPC8nlXF X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:138b:: with SMTP id d11mr30131001otq.38.1581019797333; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:09:57 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581019797; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=plc9rmbCpobZcTliUMzzhKm48PKZjqdqsznRlLdyuKBUMZFvALmcnBVZdyAWKLGbfd IXvuB4Kp40nnnI9LGDpALhsJ/vAj1btB4tjfku8+CzUCZXysa482/FWM1CqEOf+/1T/J pHDLc76ESiO9NyEKGnAaqB8GjzrStiDDsS368YDqg1SN+tsf8qkii9k5Kzvy/hvBJmvf mxfRkFkmftBVzwHTh/7+eW8luLTPLY2fSLzYlCZxAdZsYRmeImWOZaz+a80bFq3VPjoa cG7TX919MpeIss9U9ZiATqYce52Qcw4hoQoscuzLBnb+uaN7meNRyi+LD/MP+/m3SNyE X8cQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:mime-version :references:reply-to:message-id:subject:cc:to:date:from :dkim-signature; bh=wSUcqZOKcJBDGAqugVgii/8pMY4U4spSnTw3NVFJU/g=; b=ezXvlq/dQX0G5DIFyFsILNMA2TvdW2vkUUPyLsie+ncxt9gCfFgjNCsrGJfFueCf49 jPBcjBUfaIE2SOszii0RsDhzYptZ1IS5c8RGmk2dIJ4MyfhVthbhTBxFC3BSmMSGSKWx T89eL38rqUgEJ3XNqMF0E2AE3Tli6Ppwh3eb+iyEb+qJmhLghpxft6vSpltT/kIq3YAN 2fiAlAwyUVPb4t8gMACrOGnFt58JplTq0je7rsh3dBk3Sf+AGAxrdVF3msN4Q5IfhVK3 WI2z1Cvj6tOr/a0+IFaz8YcCDj+eToGfsXMIZ4DAaR1a8jxg1W/WTcrXXOBjQJmFTF/z hgZg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kuUiSonA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id r12si329045otq.156.2020.02.06.12.09.36; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:09:57 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=kuUiSonA; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727773AbgBFUJM (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:09:12 -0500 Received: from mail-qv1-f65.google.com ([209.85.219.65]:35345 "EHLO mail-qv1-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727711AbgBFUJM (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:09:12 -0500 Received: by mail-qv1-f65.google.com with SMTP id u10so3475359qvi.2; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:09:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=wSUcqZOKcJBDGAqugVgii/8pMY4U4spSnTw3NVFJU/g=; b=kuUiSonA/JF14yPtB328dGv2ZFketNfYeNQToJMcG/Htw4vUokh3dj+dIHt0d0Yon+ 0CR60f+DsLaokT9YM/jfr35pIDhiKmrLdd2uADpC1Fwxb88MptMZ7Zk/RKqvtWLJcNSJ 8ojHpwusmYv0qotY1UWZQ46vFY8CyK6DFdkrBktAL8JY/PV4RaEYlGMdjaq1Xskq4Sab H72yOwkrQogyoU2oz1cLvPIS3nQ5TkLlJ8JcK+xyM2zEK71oyaQ44X6l2c4Xykt6BI0m fsG9HJaBVgMORnnnvf6q7QhkppKUGfm5T7jSSO4bKxDu1urzK5BQgO/pYX46oyapK8Qk v46Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:cc:subject:message-id:reply-to :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=wSUcqZOKcJBDGAqugVgii/8pMY4U4spSnTw3NVFJU/g=; b=hP5jGO79NWR3UhIx6lL+i1wvXRdMFVNg7xjdobRBhOWuAPNAnjyZSEoPkjtRbckMR1 VCab6ppak8exVBL6RKBDJtLxKu4g4A7LdBAFRn4bAOT8mTkSv09u5eZt/xcfLDTOx6NY LkfqpULuLK5EmUytScHekrtmktdqHGCxjKMlz4/hFPftGAaZ+zD3f0bOX3Jx1oHOIPHB VVQOB9lk7hv6YZUuAfRkGUfGQ0F3DXEwHsVVsyaWCojNQelQSDkahFmb5m+r5mtgbGYH 4M9L1NVO7nSLQsKr4SvrEduuTC9hIr2q2SdpxSuC1VI/sO7yoiHLWy3fRcbTDpemEIxL tNyw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVt2CBLjSIBL2E1+0whSa25+D0HgQoEvkrBev9Ubf2hBjf7EK9R kXs1jTkq4xvaIVgcLzId61Y= X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9c86:: with SMTP id i6mr3903089qvf.214.1581019751108; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:09:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (tripoint.kitware.com. [66.194.253.20]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h8sm180826qtm.51.2020.02.06.12.09.10 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 12:09:10 -0800 (PST) From: Ben Boeckel X-Google-Original-From: Ben Boeckel Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:09:11 -0500 To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Linux Media Mailing List , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Jonathan Corbet , David Howells , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] docs: crypto: convert asymmetric-keys.txt to ReST Message-ID: <20200206200911.GA2830394@erythro.kitware.com> Reply-To: list.lkml.keyrings@me.benboeckel.net References: <1b6cd1da02dda27a725a6c4214019a1e306a7927.1581001737.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1b6cd1da02dda27a725a6c4214019a1e306a7927.1581001737.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.13.3 (2020-01-12) Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 16:11:21 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > - (1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:" then the match > + 1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:" then the match This update was followed in all the enumeration changes except… > - (2) If the criterion string is of the form ":" then the > + 2) If the criterion string is of the form ":" then the The whitespace here doesn't match up. Which is preferred? > - (1) Signature verification. > +1) Signature verification. Here, the indentation was lost too. Is this intentional? --Ben