Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
Date:   Mon, 10 Feb 2020 07:10:47 +0100
From:   Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To:     Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com>
Cc:     list.lkml.keyrings@me.benboeckel.net,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@infradead.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
        keyrings@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] docs: crypto: convert asymmetric-keys.txt to ReST
Message-ID: <20200210071047.0db3f3a6@kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20200206200911.GA2830394@erythro.kitware.com>
References: <cover.1581001737.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
        <1b6cd1da02dda27a725a6c4214019a1e306a7927.1581001737.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
        <20200206200911.GA2830394@erythro.kitware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

Em Thu, 6 Feb 2020 15:09:11 -0500
Ben Boeckel <mathstuf@gmail.com> escreveu:

> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 16:11:21 +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > - (1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:<hexdigits>" then the =
match
> > +  1) If the criterion string is of the form "id:<hexdigits>" then the =
match =20
>=20
> This update was followed in all the enumeration changes except=E2=80=A6
>=20
> > - (2) If the criterion string is of the form "<subtype>:<hexdigits>" th=
en the
> > + 2) If the criterion string is of the form "<subtype>:<hexdigits>" the=
n the =20
>=20
> The whitespace here doesn't match up. Which is preferred?

That was a mistake.

>=20
> > - (1) Signature verification.
> > +1) Signature verification. =20
>=20
> Here, the indentation was lost too. Is this intentional?

Both ways would work. I'll keep the original indentation for the next
version. Thanks for pointing it.

Cheers,
Mauro