Received: by 2002:a25:1506:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3967370ybv; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:42:44 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxc01ro3zeZEP4KfiBPt98lRpZTH+rr6HnYhLanv7pnqDD/Ceivi8g2olG5Z9A3Z2YvmMXW X-Received: by 2002:a9d:20c1:: with SMTP id x59mr1988947ota.286.1581356564812; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:42:44 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1581356564; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=BYDOdi0GwMnO/meP5ownd4Eir0be7i/rHrNBQGsCm/qA7WXwTGlIGXSyAisAmtUt22 HkWaXdmQA8DjFvwNDDqVafhWvacHJawvqFzYTtNE7x0D8n3XYyz/i/JpsjPMBJAWg4wK SzXEd2mIIFczuetlARLmPtQ8eblDmN6gwjVHbIrE1lLLl2Pkmq3O3902h6b3exM2y/in 7HOjq7Kj/xyFkfxFwhdZjpObt0BXrtZSC+pdO+dlQ37qRsPkJKx5K/BEzIN5K015N4ba +57/bMLYndo+INe2C6gU370BWsAXNe2RwT4GZJKdzgX7E9WkBWCtWyZgNyc+cyEKXaJD 7v1g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:message-id:content-transfer-encoding :mime-version:references:in-reply-to:date:cc:to:from:subject; bh=NBcBIsvB01CFAoEt4NPMaFirNIIhc35LF2lRumaFcII=; b=woySTcldJ0J5GHO4epxXON0xdt1NIIZ7jVedARlDq9A2Cx3H51pgVkNXjQWJ5DjlOG 26j49eCecGhOZVPjDKcPn7dpZWhyDddzRaWZXEMRYLluQQ+QXfAHxmUckmnNxVHS59zv 1GqBnqzvgfyPpwGRMDzPoAbltI982y1xGSKFYSdmGtWnjB6Oc+ztl4kzcbaAYxrk7KYW 5pkK0I7Woz24zO7KGb/B/fOzPB4eWoP7WIsbm9Q3CU8+aCNQVFKLAHQ8bkMHOIrMkjg2 VN0T+nGDJNDxTJg6FC7ys73JKH3Bl9gZZaHTqDPV5l125ebAXVC5BjDN1tIsyIkxnI3H a30w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id a5si454074oie.17.2020.02.10.09.42.32; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 09:42:44 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=ibm.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727987AbgBJRma (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:42:30 -0500 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:52888 "EHLO mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727922AbgBJRm3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:42:29 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 01AHbs2x182444 for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:42:28 -0500 Received: from e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.99]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2y1ucjc19g-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:42:28 -0500 Received: from localhost by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:42:26 -0000 Received: from b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.196) by e06smtp03.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.133) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:42:21 -0000 Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.232]) by b06cxnps4074.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 01AHgK0452297812 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:42:20 GMT Received: from d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1B352050; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:42:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [9.85.140.79]) by d06av21.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B1E5204F; Mon, 10 Feb 2020 17:42:18 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] crypto: rename sm3-256 to sm3 in hash_algo_name From: Mimi Zohar To: Tianjia Zhang , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, ebiggers@kernel.org, Jarkko Sakkinen Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2020 12:42:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200210124440.23929-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> References: <20200210124440.23929-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <20200210124440.23929-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.20.5 (3.20.5-1.fc24) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20021017-0012-0000-0000-000003859262 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20021017-0013-0000-0000-000021C20B02 Message-Id: <1581356538.5585.833.camel@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138,18.0.572 definitions=2020-02-10_06:2020-02-10,2020-02-10 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 malwarescore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 priorityscore=1501 suspectscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2001150001 definitions=main-2002100132 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org [Cc'ing Jarkko] On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:44 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > The name sm3-256 is defined in hash_algo_name in hash_info, but the > algorithm name implemented in sm3_generic.c is sm3, which will cause > the sm3-256 algorithm to be not found in some application scenarios of > the hash algorithm, and an ENOENT error will occur. For example, > IMA, keys, and other subsystems that reference hash_algo_name all use > the hash algorithm of sm3. > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang Missing is the "Fixes" tag and Cc'ing the person who upstreamed "sm3- 256" in the first place. Mimi > --- > crypto/hash_info.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/hash_info.c b/crypto/hash_info.c > index c754cb75dd1a..a49ff96bde77 100644 > --- a/crypto/hash_info.c > +++ b/crypto/hash_info.c > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ const char *const hash_algo_name[HASH_ALGO__LAST] = { > [HASH_ALGO_TGR_128] = "tgr128", > [HASH_ALGO_TGR_160] = "tgr160", > [HASH_ALGO_TGR_192] = "tgr192", > - [HASH_ALGO_SM3_256] = "sm3-256", > + [HASH_ALGO_SM3_256] = "sm3", > [HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_256] = "streebog256", > [HASH_ALGO_STREEBOG_512] = "streebog512", > };