Received: by 2002:a25:e7d8:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id e207csp2357805ybh; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vv2nn3zUwlCM3dc34fClvHQpPE6LEYt1z9KoApNZu+tqYoRwUZDCP0fqwgXqTDM0DZYqA8g X-Received: by 2002:a9d:518e:: with SMTP id y14mr1149785otg.27.1584347361553; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1584347361; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=wvQd93r9ENDemYqlZdNjzANodALCGiCIlP6r+LFHLN0WBf5PLhfFJBrZNOSENkFzJ5 Yh21f/l9sYN63yF3deV6WomBICpoUpYtEqfzpIwogHliM/Pjk88doTA6g+ucXSh/gp6O yx92B29/eS4u2qT3IePuawO8oF7pSJOdhlrL6O4RUV7pSEpzY9qtdRdN4UbkHCyxpy66 9U/i1VLMn/C2a03un7N9A3tywynypkfvneb9ITe925WxJsaqRIRtbEAPuqWikvgp9keH A/8yYegmQWBE5ezYa0cz4iQREyjkhPy6HW+J7gGs8FLZGdxJ5yFKNj7R6OKmOelHR4FW Hy7w== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:mime-version:message-id:date:references :in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Wzyrk+fASOn+BZi4nttbW69ji6PDuVpnBcMzuZaCsD4=; b=YvJsoJuBlRmpK3LarxN7mDSzkSk9H6TWqwAT5jwmhs1OFY+BovS4pIPP8Res+siiaQ NNdNCSA/CdrmS4au61g5vhSq7rrZdmQbJSS4PAPGECpIO6wJiykokdjEtBXR5vgwyh+q C+WuE4SJ3Es2jsMDivS2TLZD5D3uDcqsAtbtArBKYcCw4skTOH8E5NAIcDbGSWBfxr4g Z/j5fZ6ijA+b/LxjWQWeC+vJv97Zo44om4hZUbB0kn380sgVFCH+rcJGpY87IKrcWw3Y BBCaqMTQXwOGLAhVMJHn8m5CSxxpuIv9G+BsbNm+1isTewAnda7Yi+sfk0wSUpNx9B5O Epag== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id f36si10204606otf.201.2020.03.16.01.29.00; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 01:29:21 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730107AbgCPI2y (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:28:54 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:51187 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728302AbgCPI2y (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 04:28:54 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jDl72-0002gq-LP; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:28:40 +0100 Received: by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1A0BE100F5A; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:28:40 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Gleixner To: Corentin Labbe , peterz@infradead.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, mingo@redhat.com, dvhart@infradead.org Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: BUG: cryptsetup benchmark stuck In-Reply-To: <20200315145214.GA9576@Red> References: <20200315145214.GA9576@Red> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 09:28:40 +0100 Message-ID: <877dzkem9z.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1,SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Corentin, Corentin Labbe writes: > On next-20200313, running cryptsetup benchmark is stuck. > I have bisected this problem twice and the result is the same: > > git bisect bad 8019ad13ef7f64be44d4f892af9c840179009254 > # first bad commit: [8019ad13ef7f64be44d4f892af9c840179009254] futex: Fix inode life-time issue > > Since the two bisect lead to the same commit, I think it should be > right one even if I dont find anything related to my problem. I'm as puzzled as you. > But reverting this patch is impossible, so I cannot test to try > without it. You need to revert two: 8d67743653dc ("futex: Unbreak futex hashing") 8019ad13ef7f ("futex: Fix inode life-time issue") Thanks, tglx