Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200324084821.29944-1-masahiroy@kernel.org> <20200324084821.29944-12-masahiroy@kernel.org>
 <CAKwvOdkj3dDNcbY4hwyManfviPdFoBooJJmFOAKL2YJCZNuhtA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdkj3dDNcbY4hwyManfviPdFoBooJJmFOAKL2YJCZNuhtA@mail.gmail.com>
From:   "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>
Date:   Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:17:02 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHmME9pV93Zey2=XghxzThTHbZarFrnxwnGatXHyQjevPf7R=g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/16] x86: probe assembler capabilities via kconfig
 instead of makefile
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc:     Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "open list:HARDWARE RANDOM NUMBER GENERATOR CORE" 
        <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        "maintainer:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" <x86@kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:01 AM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
>
> Can 11 just be rebased with 8 dropped?

8 adds comments to one place. 11 moves them to another place, while
doing other things.

Your desire is to skip the first step? I guess there's no problem with
this, but I'm curious to learn why.