Received: by 2002:a25:6193:0:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id v141csp951977ybb; Fri, 3 Apr 2020 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJCdpjBVAhhCcPgeJi14iU12S9a8V4ouVK6LNkbWJMJrX+pOQVPwyIhlX7drvdLE6SQsSar X-Received: by 2002:aca:3110:: with SMTP id x16mr5044308oix.47.1585951635629; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1585951635; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=EQHIyW3QNRFD78DK8jKeRsPVl1PD8i3YI0kMUD5TzybAp1kGxZO9/IyW0yxj3M6Rum DBut0gRI7OjzzDBf/6x42hzgWPgllZ4X7Cs/BzqwtV1eZ2j8Er139lNEWnu6/UWap9LU T/cnsOP780nePX6bPoCMoxQRFIROHzIFUPkrPxGW/CXaFhD+dKI1+ikGe1GTv0j8nHXr 4vAItKeLmNgWOxjFjYZE/fsREtGw6uC2UB4sJjjtEhgGmt4liIuw56NJlRtWGE3Muqoz EjL9LtnnAWrOso4G8EfdRsnZ5PIIWusUkfIfyqHzXlvTsIL+QbWkl4USr+7uU5wrRW+W MedQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=Jvf6UBbuRqhqjk1c9hQHqBQYGRVCiMu8hlJM4rd3Uiw=; b=SxSA0PZ9n/Z7dPs9+mqzfbKoRZKnYSs1UCTqk5UNqQNt7Z0t4VkwIVUmSuhpI9y747 /CCXmDxBZz6YoFP8p1Jp2zZthGMdq7T3zvgDEeKeNQGmTfg5Fqv+/r8/VH7B2l3S9f8P 7gcxLedW+V+iTjsOiGGqwg5zD+yUiCTQ6iETTmUG04VFdQvPSvOzWPphuhK9GjMLhjHW 4gM4KKjV0YpFefN+/SphZFMPPUtbVzMLx4QF0GNVpTXlcowNWVQNJJMI5cfm6TZXQkFK VtUZ5CJUlTBaaBSI98JX3VQOpuKY9Nzr7zsYEC7yKv9lxQX9cnvCuVTZsQr+PHgAxO++ Wsbg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [209.132.180.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id z90si4270730otb.47.2020.04.03.15.06.51; Fri, 03 Apr 2020 15:07:15 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.132.180.67; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: best guess record for domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 209.132.180.67 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727867AbgDCWGs (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 18:06:48 -0400 Received: from cmccmta1.chinamobile.com ([221.176.66.79]:3381 "EHLO cmccmta1.chinamobile.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727829AbgDCWGs (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2020 18:06:48 -0400 Received: from spf.mail.chinamobile.com (unknown[172.16.121.7]) by rmmx-syy-dmz-app02-12002 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee25e87b3617b4-7d944; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:06:25 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee25e87b3617b4-7d944 X-RM-TagInfo: emlType=0 X-RM-SPAM-FLAG: 00000000 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown[112.3.208.73]) by rmsmtp-syy-appsvr04-12004 (RichMail) with SMTP id 2ee45e87b35f24a-49938; Sat, 04 Apr 2020 06:06:25 +0800 (CST) X-RM-TRANSID: 2ee45e87b35f24a-49938 From: Tang Bin To: narmstrong@baylibre.com, clabbe@baylibre.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Tang Bin Subject: [PATCH v6]crypto: amlogic - Delete duplicate dev_err in meson_crypto_probe() Date: Sat, 4 Apr 2020 06:07:54 +0800 Message-Id: <20200403220754.7856-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1.windows.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org When something goes wrong, platform_get_irq() will print an error message, so in order to avoid the situation of repeat output,we should remove dev_err here. Signed-off-by: Tang Bin --- Changes from v5 - modify the commit message. Changes from v4: - rewrite the code, because the code in v4 is wrong, sorry. Changes form v3: - fix the theme writing error. Changes from v2: - modify the theme format and content description. - reformat the patch, it's the wrong way to resubmit a new patch that should be modified on top of the original. The original piece is: https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1219611/ Changes from v1: - the title has changed, because the description is not very detailed. - the code has been modified, because it needs to match the theme. drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-core.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-core.c b/drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-core.c index 9d4ead2f7..411857fad 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-core.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/amlogic/amlogic-gxl-core.c @@ -253,10 +253,8 @@ static int meson_crypto_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) mc->irqs = devm_kcalloc(mc->dev, MAXFLOW, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL); for (i = 0; i < MAXFLOW; i++) { mc->irqs[i] = platform_get_irq(pdev, i); - if (mc->irqs[i] < 0) { - dev_err(mc->dev, "Cannot get IRQ for flow %d\n", i); + if (mc->irqs[i] < 0) return mc->irqs[i]; - } err = devm_request_irq(&pdev->dev, mc->irqs[i], meson_irq_handler, 0, "gxl-crypto", mc); -- 2.20.1.windows.1