Received: by 2002:a05:6902:102b:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id x11csp402108ybt; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxZS4Y6kOIpkHh49VuqDWKHdwVOPaL6ezkaQLy/rEhPMegv1wxWaJtO7DWhhHPNlwBGfOU X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:c201:: with SMTP id d1mr37771731ejz.40.1594062470291; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1594062470; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=opu5zX8QvQ0jmMVal39EnXVjLxWq+rR9eO/c/5YDFK2pdYBEcPq/rfzrlvWVY4uj2z o806uM7M6y7GhW43Fisg3JXit7izshGrR4ah4j5tlxdoo1+qdzuvk+5kvdnt7kuy6d7U TATU+ieHWor38QlMQercFaZ4suDultnsKd8+uh6CLaxsIubStx0HKR5cdidM315CbsgG zIKEErKpM/MY4ztPIpd5xr2gHHjMpvpYkQpO0Qo/qxTpROI8wRwpjBFZjyn+x4WnaOao pZc/hTfMLPgH+2LCBUkS/bQaLjk/cD/xtvp3Jbnk1mkFKs1wRpK95vOEQkBnG+b5/PWD 0vAA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=1DJHhK4giiXiXgPkDRArQOw5rDUqkyGk9nXZTpOZ5p0=; b=z83uI+q5rkjvzR2yntbPy1vu2SHvh1B04ixOzAz59Mo3bqmjx5TzDqpzNI8AKW060O gjxrklWR3M4kn5evWuWUvk8GHVI4Lti8n5xJU6X7b5x1OuT8bvainS9Srzm8TgdgESGi 2KsqA4Y5FYmjuI36/qOXu86Tzsc3efoFqFNabg9M31u8MCV6A1n+psJUHUYHJgFGnZCK BbwBujRWKfiTDv1wwGe8Ao5D42FKOyY6gcrxQzsKN39IFwMBU92j40khhPdy6oUKJvpS Q3yLTSfNSSisMmEfaFb7MH2tPGbflkku32Tm+HXvxRItJy4QTDOskM/zVLjK1rlGPVWv 12gw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ZE41gFeH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id l12si15041182edk.328.2020.07.06.12.07.22; Mon, 06 Jul 2020 12:07:50 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=default header.b=ZE41gFeH; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725942AbgGFTHU (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:07:20 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:46930 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725898AbgGFTHT (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jul 2020 15:07:19 -0400 Received: from gmail.com (unknown [104.132.1.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 437DF206CD; Mon, 6 Jul 2020 19:07:19 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1594062439; bh=g+EcRxgNTaWqGbySsBDOrH0fzlI1OukJrP4d1xs4fZM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZE41gFeHlunj1Qe8qe+t/I7rfFakfgW69YjdbBOvLtAcRl0MZ0mWM/qFGKjptiG7B 4M5mRMCxLhGoYmKBsQ29O386ErvbqMyg4XxGQ/Cbp37oVf2EzMFWuZKaJAgTKJTDhF Ffh4MIj0ESUek+0DbkmZrPp9V3IBoAGkvpRtMenk= Date: Mon, 6 Jul 2020 12:07:17 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Herbert Xu Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: chacha - Add DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE macro Message-ID: <20200706190717.GB736284@gmail.com> References: <20200706133733.GA6479@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200706133733.GA6479@gondor.apana.org.au> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 11:37:34PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote: > diff --git a/lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c b/lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c > index ad0699ce702f9..1d7bb0b91b83c 100644 > --- a/lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c > +++ b/lib/crypto/chacha20poly1305.c > @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ void chacha20poly1305_encrypt(u8 *dst, const u8 *src, const size_t src_len, > const u64 nonce, > const u8 key[CHACHA20POLY1305_KEY_SIZE]) > { > - u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS]; > + DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE(chacha_state); > u32 k[CHACHA_KEY_WORDS]; > __le64 iv[2]; > > @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ void xchacha20poly1305_encrypt(u8 *dst, const u8 *src, const size_t src_len, > const u8 nonce[XCHACHA20POLY1305_NONCE_SIZE], > const u8 key[CHACHA20POLY1305_KEY_SIZE]) > { > - u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS]; > + DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE(chacha_state); > > xchacha_init(chacha_state, key, nonce); > __chacha20poly1305_encrypt(dst, src, src_len, ad, ad_len, chacha_state); > @@ -172,7 +172,7 @@ bool chacha20poly1305_decrypt(u8 *dst, const u8 *src, const size_t src_len, > const u64 nonce, > const u8 key[CHACHA20POLY1305_KEY_SIZE]) > { > - u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS]; > + DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE(chacha_state); > u32 k[CHACHA_KEY_WORDS]; > __le64 iv[2]; > bool ret; > @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ bool xchacha20poly1305_decrypt(u8 *dst, const u8 *src, const size_t src_len, > const u8 nonce[XCHACHA20POLY1305_NONCE_SIZE], > const u8 key[CHACHA20POLY1305_KEY_SIZE]) > { > - u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS]; > + DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE(chacha_state); > > xchacha_init(chacha_state, key, nonce); > return __chacha20poly1305_decrypt(dst, src, src_len, ad, ad_len, > @@ -216,7 +216,7 @@ bool chacha20poly1305_crypt_sg_inplace(struct scatterlist *src, > { > const u8 *pad0 = page_address(ZERO_PAGE(0)); > struct poly1305_desc_ctx poly1305_state; > - u32 chacha_state[CHACHA_STATE_WORDS]; > + DEFINE_CHACHA_STATE(chacha_state); > struct sg_mapping_iter miter; > size_t partial = 0; > unsigned int flags; This changes chacha_state to be a pointer, which breaks clearing the state because that uses sizeof(chacha_state): memzero_explicit(chacha_state, sizeof(chacha_state)); It would need to be changed to use CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE. - Eric