Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Tue, 4 Aug 2020 22:33:42 +1000
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@benyossef.com>
Cc:     Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccree - Delete non-standard algorithms
Message-ID: <20200804123342.GA12191@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20200728040446.GA12763@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <CAOtvUMc-RnxJ2c=GaTpS5nNd0xjKqd1zyFPO=5_ANCzMYXFU1w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAOtvUMc-RnxJ2c=GaTpS5nNd0xjKqd1zyFPO=5_ANCzMYXFU1w@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 03:32:40PM +0300, Gilad Ben-Yossef wrote:
>
> Sigh... yes, these were left in because I I thought it might be
> interesting to bring support
> for these algorithms (including a generic implementation) into
> dm-crypt but alas, there seems
> to be no interest.

I think we definitely should do them at some point.  But we need
to do this in a way that is general rather than specific to one
driver.

> If it's OK with you instead of this patch I'll send a patch series
> that also removes the support for
> these from the driver, not just the registration, as there is no point
> in carrying dead code.

Sure, I'll wait for your patch.

Thanks,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt