Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp1566168pxa; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxb3b7GEcZn3tSoF3f0gp7VWMGY/mIoyosxEHvPSrF9bgVqOxn+HrXGZVxUfXShvuzQrc1P X-Received: by 2002:a50:e809:: with SMTP id e9mr613170edn.133.1597960300038; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1597960300; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=TA3JE8B7L0rHQV5aUSMqXcAaLWtQG15q4tbz3nBrtGkRrDXc0q+tN2M+1fArVTQuSZ FZ0mQXIG5tB63Mfih65NjBJWzYWk7loS4sRn9sfB00ASHE+3Xp6fLMTWGDlJhVhFUfps 7f138XhsRNbfInaXtEYAlax4Uk4C+izLJGHVWAkQaHcaclGwaDXdze/L5ksW+QmNxo8F RHqIdU4X2+pbihZ0VG4zPkV2vwB82J/Rhd1TSk23iYoHVM/eTxejnIxvqYq+XCs3lHKc Or8681MNZG+H5pUKdNEYS/UvMxMbfExeOfnPkCc9D4ncbfSZyFmESeqYJIl3Z0bK3LlM LX0Q== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:user-agent:in-reply-to :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date; bh=BhvyRi/fcM9XBlSV+y98lo6YbVplDjoaDwjVXIQL8Oo=; b=MunX+WuubPBwBqE7BqLxDKlt8wvRW8Ir2f9C0zY0NXTYjotrWy4MByJwbS/mTmBDll WVJLb0w6nC6UHZVZWKMuwCbBq3m1XWIu8SbaKPpWcToYNIhsiRQ1aRISELNSmQmqmFaM H1E+84981/Ts5+QfYpKqgLzaOGxfGUfoKpKywmTZ+P7fzrtdT2Rz0awTjEPNan7Zx7O4 P4ZbnevVx58bGIXuzyH9Auy7YWKlTatAFHSRc0kCbeW6C02CN9Pm8UVLfhvHPxb9NM1f pNOyxQ2Kg+sH32LXr4uk8y/jTL2p+GU03o28zr9gF+Xon1JjoNHa6aQOKykvYRQtGjA+ s9oQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id lz26si2104858ejb.40.2020.08.20.14.51.16; Thu, 20 Aug 2020 14:51:40 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728252AbgHTUK6 (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:10:58 -0400 Received: from helcar.hmeau.com ([216.24.177.18]:49320 "EHLO fornost.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728141AbgHTUK6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Aug 2020 16:10:58 -0400 Received: from gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au ([192.168.0.7]) by fornost.hmeau.com with smtp (Exim 4.92 #5 (Debian)) id 1k8qtk-0001j7-1U; Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:10:57 +1000 Received: by gwarestrin.arnor.me.apana.org.au (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:10:55 +1000 Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2020 06:10:55 +1000 From: Herbert Xu To: Ben Greear Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Eric Biggers Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] crypto: Implement cmac based on cbc skcipher Message-ID: <20200820201055.GA24119@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20200820070645.GA21395@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200820072910.GA21631@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200820074414.GA21848@gondor.apana.org.au> <20200820075353.GA21901@gondor.apana.org.au> <6bd84823-7dc6-e132-2959-e73d6806d2f1@candelatech.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6bd84823-7dc6-e132-2959-e73d6806d2f1@candelatech.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 06:54:58AM -0700, Ben Greear wrote: > > Here's a run on an: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-7700T CPU @ 2.90GHz > > testing speed of async cmac(aes-aesni) (cmac(aes-aesni)) > > [ 259.397910] tcrypt: test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 8442 cycles/operation, 8 cycles/byte > > testing speed of async cmac(aes-generic) (cmac(aes-generic)) > > [ 294.171530] tcrypt: test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 9022 cycles/operation, 8 cycles/byte > > On my slow apu2 board with processor: AMD GX-412TC SOC > > testing speed of async cmac(aes-aesni) (cmac(aes-aesni)) > > [ 51.751810] tcrypt: test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 18759 cycles/operation, 18 cycle > > testing speed of async cmac(aes-generic) (cmac(aes-generic)) > > [ 97.837497] tcrypt: test 8 ( 1024 byte blocks, 1024 bytes per update, 1 updates): 31365 cycles/operation, 30 cycle So clearly aes-generic is slower than aes-aesni even with saving and restoring for each block. Therefore improving the performance of the latter per se does not make sense. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt