Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Mon, 24 Aug 2020 15:01:42 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>
To:     "Van Leeuwen, Pascal" <pvanleeuwen@rambus.com>
Cc:     Sabrina Dubroca <sd@queasysnail.net>,
        Scott Dial <scott@scottdial.com>,
        "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        Ryan Cox <ryan_cox@byu.edu>,
        "netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
        "davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@bootlin.com>,
        "ebiggers@google.com" <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: Severe performance regression in "net: macsec: preserve ingress
 frame ordering"
Message-ID: <20200824130142.GN2588906@lunn.ch>
References: <1b0cec71-d084-8153-2ba4-72ce71abeb65@byu.edu>
 <a335c8eb-0450-1274-d1bf-3908dcd9b251@scottdial.com>
 <20200810133427.GB1128331@bistromath.localdomain>
 <7663cbb1-7a55-6986-7d5d-8fab55887a80@scottdial.com>
 <20200812100443.GF1128331@bistromath.localdomain>
 <CY4PR0401MB36524B348358B23A8DFB741AC3420@CY4PR0401MB3652.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
 <20200812124201.GF2154440@lunn.ch>
 <CY4PR0401MB365240B04FC43F7F8AAE6A0CC3560@CY4PR0401MB3652.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CY4PR0401MB365240B04FC43F7F8AAE6A0CC3560@CY4PR0401MB3652.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 09:07:26AM +0000, Van Leeuwen, Pascal wrote:
> No need to point this out to me as we're the number one supplier of inline MACsec IP :-)
> In fact, the Microsemi PHY solution you mention is ours, major parts of that design were
> even created by these 2 hands here.

Oh,  O.K.

Do you know of other silicon vendors which are using the same IP?
Maybe we can encourage them to share the driver, rather than re-invent
the wheel, which often happens when nobody realises it is basically
the same core with a different wrapper.

Thanks
	Andrew