Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:a0d1:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id j17csp2245232pxa; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzli9Yszw+z1t3w0+tv2eV6wDmitY/pYTB8ukBdO0Fh8V0wcJj+XeDURfmuO1aSseOJWq8t X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:52cf:: with SMTP id w15mr6114146ejn.53.1598284939396; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598284939; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tT6rb+juooP3uJwPlvH5mCRtS/kURhIt2SejMSztSLxRMGsH4WJRJ7wWuqKI3FI6r9 N//c8mpbsT+YRD6cpANsonyEXd/xC091mtm5w1un2+yOGKrNawuTwYviC9q9nOy9pxGw kGKXSvB1Qab60skyCafgzAJK/GgIdaino5/lAHt5kw9rpB+YyEklwGL83R8ttd4POjit dvFrkC2vfHcXnBj8Cf7scaRWUiv3OgAr9a0My5co9uOAD0lj3YnWrLFSyzGIEy+MxNDm z6HvniHvwU0ft/LtkQLHAu+OhwAVJIFxK25D+6TOwXzLEC5MLhTUL17oYH6tW9UIkciI O0Xw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :content-language:accept-language:in-reply-to:references:message-id :date:thread-index:thread-topic:subject:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=Wm5SQaufGEgJEswX7BVL7nDszZEAXXSBbqKFHUV6Lm4=; b=EB0gm6jWJLPIQcssbwY5uOzIV0r5FgGOF0wavy/eASRMcVO6mPkcjN/B+iXi7IsNtN +PME5iFrBSCopJnL2WiJoyAW7vbX2AnyKcg7TE+/3Fnzd6CokM7F1RaRmbwB4ppjVyQ5 rtvsd9X+uwpLGNYIWXxFcdJPCFxaoDbCv98wMZr+U1YvBkINJpVgHyzDojN4HZBEwqaC fNRhIqw+NvnGi93FCdwpvtG/uFiBk2KfEtBNwCsjAwjjC/5uLcMnbSLWbDreGBpCZzjG sTAPcCK5qFTwvRg77fpJBhMSlfvfWzSIX9Gl9SySQtHscv4R8dftrgEkqtZSYiObl8li zT1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hp.com header.s=mimecast20180716 header.b=OTR8BXEf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=hp.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ok21si7644497ejb.373.2020.08.24.09.01.52; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 09:02:19 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@hp.com header.s=mimecast20180716 header.b=OTR8BXEf; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=hp.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726666AbgHXQBK (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:01:10 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.162]:35998 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-162.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725780AbgHXQAz (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:00:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=hp.com; s=mimecast20180716; t=1598284854; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Wm5SQaufGEgJEswX7BVL7nDszZEAXXSBbqKFHUV6Lm4=; b=OTR8BXEfD80WEFfNeB4VpLnJI+gCb0glVTSVwfzBP5lDvszbve9HqrLHaEdE8gFUUArs+m alnSeSAmKHIQhSlAU5YJ0rOZS1P2kisDb1DoU6LpBELPtsk0zQDL+wof3YlcQowXWQZNVE zPwweq9ToZY0h2IyiHhC05nL86pI47E= Received: from NAM12-BN8-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn8nam12lp2175.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.55.175]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-179--kD4p2NyO0euvtJkVlbPcw-1; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 12:00:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: -kD4p2NyO0euvtJkVlbPcw-1 Received: from TU4PR8401MB1216.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:7712::13) by TU4PR8401MB0591.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (2a01:111:e400:770c::22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.3305.25; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:00:51 +0000 Received: from TU4PR8401MB1216.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::49d2:7bed:b12b:b354]) by TU4PR8401MB1216.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([fe80::49d2:7bed:b12b:b354%8]) with mapi id 15.20.3305.026; Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:00:51 +0000 From: "Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjunath" To: Stephan Mueller , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" Subject: RE: HMAC test fails for big key using libkcapi Thread-Topic: HMAC test fails for big key using libkcapi Thread-Index: AdZ6JJoFQMwI76Z+R1Spwzgk7TA7XwABt1oAAAEOAhA= Date: Mon, 24 Aug 2020 16:00:51 +0000 Message-ID: References: <6448041.Y6S9NjorxK@tauon.chronox.de> In-Reply-To: <6448041.Y6S9NjorxK@tauon.chronox.de> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [49.207.201.54] x-ms-publictraffictype: Email x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 22647c6a-e100-44c6-5136-08d84846e029 x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: TU4PR8401MB0591: x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219; x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1 x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0; x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: RnKoLgV/vFeIX/BoY9Pi/2Xc2Azs3TIduC8PZx/Mb6WnqukS5HItr5lu5ZaP1NqIICmMMLy7/2TF0J+xC6NeEWUdH77vPeZpZ/9sH8upf+X9bH9Bk815xNJUT9mKtVpNfo4XASsS14XSjcEk/OaWvKiTEcVC1DPvHC3SD+FmVRTy0queM9/GBAjXHC//MgZUTO7Q/vtshAS4A+d/n5MY15wj2NMBxwDLgMICs3YHEehE7QJJUgAbpbcW8AEnhfjZ5PMVbwtujID5TNugbD9nQY3j3BW8Xci999bP9TsWRlBf2fvej3jo9j3h9Iq8XkUbZ2Fs/BWJmbtWOY+vGHrIqA== x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255;CTRY:;LANG:en;SCL:1;SRV:;IPV:NLI;SFV:NSPM;H:TU4PR8401MB1216.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM;PTR:;CAT:NONE;SFS:(346002)(376002)(366004)(396003)(136003)(39860400002)(4744005)(7696005)(8676002)(52536014)(5660300002)(55016002)(6506007)(53546011)(26005)(86362001)(55236004)(186003)(316002)(110136005)(83380400001)(8936002)(71200400001)(33656002)(478600001)(66446008)(76116006)(66946007)(66476007)(64756008)(66556008)(2906002)(9686003);DIR:OUT;SFP:1102; x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata: 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 x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: hp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: TU4PR8401MB1216.NAMPRD84.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 22647c6a-e100-44c6-5136-08d84846e029 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Aug 2020 16:00:51.7580 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: ca7981a2-785a-463d-b82a-3db87dfc3ce6 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: I8JnA7KnmHZFCGD8857C6Z2AxZ9NMFHtdzr5Q4iG0gzg+mDnTSYKgArrnPCs/V7I/LrpWFczer2dtCM0heeK0Q== X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: TU4PR8401MB0591 Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA62A171 smtp.mailfrom=jayalakshmi.bhat@hp.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0.002 X-Mimecast-Originator: hp.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hi Stephen, It worked, thank you so much Regards, Jaya -----Original Message----- From: Stephan Mueller =20 Sent: Monday, August 24, 2020 9:00 PM To: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org; Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjunath Subject: Re: HMAC test fails for big key using libkcapi Am Montag, 24. August 2020, 16:41:13 CEST schrieb Bhat, Jayalakshmi Manjuna= th: Hi Jayalakshmi, > Hi All, >=20 > I am using libkcapi to execute HMAC tests. One of key size is 229248 byte= s.=20 > setsockopt(tfmfd, SOL_ALG, ALG_SET_KEY API fails to set the key. I am=20 > not getting an option to set the buffer size to higher value. >=20 > Can you please provide me inputs on how to set the higher buffer size=20 > to socket? Update your network write buffer size? /proc/sys/net/core/wmem_default >=20 > Regards, > Jayalakshmi Ciao Stephan