Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:22f:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 15csp1633352pxk; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxDKUPg/YLq3Pyvg+AUHvsttCp2bHbTVncpLBtlwQQEiNtj/AjD+PomS6GN3bM5xCkyMi96 X-Received: by 2002:a50:d942:: with SMTP id u2mr1319371edj.0.1598957888209; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1598957888; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=L04tQCWKZsEm+aYnePpx9n8oTOwq4mMZ+x+8NRmsI2Zdc04sekW2+o8meAk7bZJf9O lZfgygyWKQv14TNr90pStZNVrXBbAkgu2e19yvWdR7vkqcqzj9272depyql4UArO12vQ WdjVlaKiTnKf5FQ1f306vJ2f59RmL7mIU/o1m/zapDShzj+QfdiA17fL6mOcNFHwX/Gr G8OgBvgpxSP3w3wb5uez4ndxrhajwLXscoRxSqMX4hiDy2piRW2sT2t9N9TqttlWtypa cgXVUrF8Q2vn27E1w4lgyFFUuVtc08XylZsMpx9m92wC7CYj0sZvzvVOSzCYbBKgTCvG A08g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:sender:in-reply-to:content-disposition :mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date :dkim-signature; bh=Qv+hrnb2xjD7g2xlHs9VRxTYEef/MpVBAkk7Wae12HI=; b=GkFj36iaywFKUtb7KtaZ+0fx9QOQNA9elPcg4ZnY/s5bT8qwg3qKQh9aWbSqd+ijPA LJHgQ+CH1I87sow9Di8a4v+TVDLRlvdMGXUkAv2RCnV5DXuqpMc9ULWvq36FDDoY2wEo hQbDEJ64fhgrGPpT48OoSFzU4IYH7xgScEay9TIciy6oxfXaw1YcxDytHJqpeIGUd9rq 1I3CvxWs9zQsdnbXKjmaKSGKf68ZMCGNuKouwr/Tb3tYlDeFzHTkx779x/gcdCnE/jjB B0DWJdD2RI5anElnJZbofFFkVzJgv2zRH4q9tpatmznRwcfnje9EQVVUnPjXAyntW3lv uWUQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mu+mJXCU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10si376980edr.13.2020.09.01.03.57.35; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 03:58:08 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=mu+mJXCU; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726064AbgIAK52 (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:57:28 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:40254 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725989AbgIAK50 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Sep 2020 06:57:26 -0400 Received: from mail-wm1-x343.google.com (mail-wm1-x343.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::343]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A1B1C061244; Tue, 1 Sep 2020 03:57:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-wm1-x343.google.com with SMTP id b79so698904wmb.4; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 03:57:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Qv+hrnb2xjD7g2xlHs9VRxTYEef/MpVBAkk7Wae12HI=; b=mu+mJXCUgEHYzQ+AFoW3Gg4lYPpS4akRS7goCqjfdIKp9raZbie4Nmrn0RuuaScL/e jemoLvra7j6h57dg1fgOFWXgDn8egNhyO8fiUAthllj3NuikyA7VT/JJl/gO2qkJfIUM uPoQTEvptvFx97Hd01omR+u25wP8rYi47TP+fpDmzWDgC9YjEbu7hjryzXMxzNVg4Av8 hbZAvwN7yp6zc0WslAo64D+ZBJqGl68qwOytmxlBCMnPv31kSu0QAGiVWqxBG8oQpEBD j/9xDyVszlgn//azc8cHtVt4Rkl1QSEz1bXWU4F/JIIrgNQ736yV+qjZfczF20eZgr8j PoZw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=Qv+hrnb2xjD7g2xlHs9VRxTYEef/MpVBAkk7Wae12HI=; b=AIokNeJToo5LY3AeUbUUDQ21ghqkJZFSoxL06XkuaQnxNuQruLehH0ArWI2ecFwYUF f5IfU0MUAya6o4Gj3Gi0F4ZijdYuhioL6AW2QV6oheEw8nSThO6f6Hlj/nPDW6axF7To g22vTHzHaWFoTqlLuDO5mIvUBQCO7K3wyiUJ5B1PIag6epk6TnTfejeW3pTOzSjbfQqM eMCfKigNjSgkCUsMrJeTf7U479AgRJM4za8ZoQjtxoSP+2jQhT6tikMTjkRVl2KjA99p LNjIjqmfZ/7g5uO/RAjyjm+e4aB/7ehj6v1VdW7jWLxJf/7XX4+pvwFKAInf0diS0ZUg Xjuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530UHhf96Rmf+MBP5tLBHsDTJrQxt995p2WfZ//DfQpVBjDQPuhB jewYdKZH7xR1LjFSIB1H9nQ= X-Received: by 2002:a7b:cd09:: with SMTP id f9mr1144870wmj.184.1598957842588; Tue, 01 Sep 2020 03:57:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Red ([2a01:cb1d:3d5:a100:264b:feff:fe03:2806]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm1650905wrm.33.2020.09.01.03.57.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 01 Sep 2020 03:57:21 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2020 12:57:19 +0200 From: Corentin Labbe To: Maxime Ripard Cc: Martin Cerveny , Chen-Yu Tsai , "David S. Miller" , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rob Herring Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: add new compatible for V3s Message-ID: <20200901105719.GA2639@Red> References: <20200831073101.3608-1-m.cerveny@computer.org> <20200831073101.3608-2-m.cerveny@computer.org> <20200901093249.orwyc5sr3z2y43fz@gilmour.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200901093249.orwyc5sr3z2y43fz@gilmour.lan> Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:30:59AM +0200, Martin Cerveny wrote: > > Like A33 "sun4i-ss" has a difference, it give SHA1 digest > > directly in BE. So add new compatible. > > > > Tested-by: Martin Cerveny > > The Tested-by tag is for the other developpers. You're very much > expected to have tested your patch before contributing it. > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny > > --- > > .../bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml | 5 ++++- > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml > > index fc823572b..180efd13a 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties: > > - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto > > - items: > > - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto > > If it's compatible with the A33, why do we need to introduce a new compatible? > > > > > reg: > > maxItems: 1 > > @@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ if: > > properties: > > compatible: > > contains: > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto > > + oneOf: > > + - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto > > I guess the A33 compatible should be on that list as well? This is the list of "need reset". So we cannot use allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto Probably this explanation should be in the commit message. Regards