Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:16a7:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id gp39csp3454673pxb; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 11:31:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxp6339gB91Sg+JiWQBT9lXOZ3IDaAOs4YZ5ozqlQOsJaAUTAEvdj2+yKmDeExsYbryZwXx X-Received: by 2002:a50:f104:: with SMTP id w4mr16542266edl.381.1604950311233; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 11:31:51 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1604950311; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=q1giLIpv/ShIV/q14lScwG8DcFn7xJLEbkyxHHDYkZVXniwv64C/vXh4LfVptfGt2a SMv4cKf4eivZ4CsQ/ucgA/Av47YVFDayBJ3MnPvDrv4wwHanTj4zdIN4dyhYNLN0TQDv sth7swV12sjjofiKT4g9f4uCNwwvzzEc19GM9iEptXM/uRH23ZAsc9elH7QbSwwud9aj +02bkNwx25yUAEgkSMmIX+WMRkmjycR3CoAlvNGAueO5qIHdV/SdyLaHp8mkWmhp/VTi hABRIJa7ybqRGutHmd7vPYFmIfMxeDzu9NqyoyKzF0OCTvQ+Aoj4Son4q38EDT9EIaTy SYTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:content-language :mime-version:user-agent:date:message-id:subject:from:cc:to; bh=q67y+iIj3mxmKZhkvEsYa76JWHCuUuEsVTt6JcxRZj0=; b=OJVPw6lCoe5UuQOjqeSPWHddz0UwnkknNbj1nkxxVV+NFHoM0JQO6n5UGCXMmk1n2b igZB559UNqOnx6SB9bmAtmj35SakgnXjiWwDV4ROve49+n4XMRH2XDHwmsEkd1gowXHU IrEHXWTK0Y9IOMU8GMD6BHxKOE3J9j44WQk4X8Otyjpw8rNw9Jk4I7mxH6ZQguRQB8Nu BHp+otKwLnh2SOVb7P5VVvUBPrSAT6vccFdoGDtMGtzfOn++LJuXb5CI3xrH69z/9Y6V e89cB4Rmg7PPlu6ybkqPnaSmAqcNsU0PGnSeaRDrLYaGLzhVbCIcDATDOY1JqZxIcPdK iSfw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id m3si7483954ejq.277.2020.11.09.11.31.18; Mon, 09 Nov 2020 11:31:51 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729697AbgKITbG (ORCPT + 99 others); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:31:06 -0500 Received: from mx3.molgen.mpg.de ([141.14.17.11]:40755 "EHLO mx1.molgen.mpg.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726691AbgKITbG (ORCPT ); Mon, 9 Nov 2020 14:31:06 -0500 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (ip5f5af1fc.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de [95.90.241.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pmenzel) by mx.molgen.mpg.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6F902064713E; Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:31:02 +0100 (CET) To: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Stephan Mueller Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Paul Menzel Subject: jitterentropy: `jent_mod_init()` takes 17 ms Message-ID: <02fa159f-4f94-cfb7-1f88-bed91c6542a1@molgen.mpg.de> Date: Mon, 9 Nov 2020 20:31:02 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Dear Linux folks, By mistake I built `XFRM_ESP` into the Linux kernel, resulting in CONFIG_CRYPTO_SEQIV=y CONFIG_CRYPTO_ECHAINIV=y and also the Jitterentropy RNG to be built in. CRYPTO_JITTERENTROPY=y So, on the Asus F2A85-M PRO starting Linux 4.10-rc3 with `initcall_debug`, the init method is run unconditionally, and it takes 17.5 ms, which is over ten percent of the overall 900 ms the Linux kernel needs until loading the init process. [ 0.300544] calling jent_mod_init+0x0/0x2c @ 1 [ 0.318438] initcall jent_mod_init+0x0/0x2c returned 0 after 17471 usecs Looking at the output of systemd-bootchart, it looks like, that this indeed delayed the boot a little, as the other init methods seem to be ordered after it. I am now building it as a module, but am wondering if the time can be reduced to below ten milliseconds. Kind regards, Paul