Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:01:42 +1100
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Cc:     Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        Steve deRosier <derosier@cal-sierra.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] crypto: aesni - add ccm(aes) algorithm implementation
Message-ID: <20201201220141.GA32029@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20201201194556.5220-1-ardb@kernel.org>
 <20201201215722.GA31941@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <60938181-3c15-9cc0-a4b4-1fa33595c44c@candelatech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <60938181-3c15-9cc0-a4b4-1fa33595c44c@candelatech.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Dec 01, 2020 at 02:00:42PM -0800, Ben Greear wrote:
>
> No one wanted to do this for the last 6+ years, so I don't think it is likely
> to happen any time soon.  If the patch is better than
> existing behaviour, please let it into the kernel.  And it is certainly
> better in my test case.

No I'm not taking this.  This just papers over the problem with
a bandaid and goes against every other implementation in aesni.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt