Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:f347:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id d7csp1249592pxu; Wed, 6 Jan 2021 17:20:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw89dIFwBdqDdIlvWbSsOhpdKErjXluXFsFSENFHPLe53E3p58TLYs6t1gTj+rzXpfwiBaN X-Received: by 2002:a50:9e22:: with SMTP id z31mr6043666ede.235.1609982454403; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:20:54 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1609982454; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=n9dc5qu1WeacWzrf88LCBFckUy3rNu0qUNPMxXiwpBpZ+rdcMNe5boTiCDAqAoeR/k Jdo4ndUcrwHFrsBRAS9X33NbB7KODToyciTP5bYZ8oUGtFKszRIXDa02+3OuvpjPsDPH 6xkDhkuRzq7ZTYK22bON/0rJDw9DsHbEPju439rEyg72K0RyVt+lHDmAZh0CWLz4OHm3 s9KGdFpgo/q8s+iadzwUE75jHGmNs1Yn+LkjDFzZuqSOouGk9d7seu9t0hAXGitacYEg 7BmqACVBF72TVAuTN2OW/Y9PZO9teLNGxZazD8gTVkZcnRuOPKbvsFcS/VHA3T4pyg3x hU/A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:subject:cc:to:message-id:date; bh=NnaOxahbfH5kmW1/qGanQoeWrbHsddeIEB1GwIKcMOc=; b=W0EsfMk0igQzhswUt23DyIgboxlCroQsPhw98Q21zyRog3t0G7RvzRrJw7XpivXWhX PduQd+9SLmK7lvs1z2+QEhmefC3JEdUWLjrbsh7KoT6i520hJUzPN0zsH20z2cmRC39A akwj0uzmFOjBAAXh048Cz4E6ya6mRzdsLn130TT3fgVyWvfeZzbICemdTlSpP6Iw3ePE iCrskbImH9EqSwR0PXJhviKiSCzNPBBfovYGIVVKnN4nCjsuY9THDFe35F8QtfXpoA1Q Q22vfj1w7/dPy/cg0DAoc/ZLXzEiFeglNAJPdevkMiF37KJmheAnES7PcRPtazyjdps+ dQzg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i10si1702139ejd.240.2021.01.06.17.20.34; Wed, 06 Jan 2021 17:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726009AbhAGBUK (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:20:10 -0500 Received: from mrdf0111.ocn.ad.jp ([125.206.160.167]:47912 "EHLO mrdf0111.ocn.ad.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726301AbhAGBUJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Jan 2021 20:20:09 -0500 Received: from mogw5208.ocn.ad.jp (mogw5208.ocn.ad.jp [125.206.161.9]) by mrdf0111.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B0C3E02EF; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:18:51 +0900 (JST) Received: from mf-smf-unw005c1.ocn.ad.jp (mf-smf-unw005c1.ocn.ad.jp [153.138.219.78]) by mogw5208.ocn.ad.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 132CD2A041E; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:17:34 +0900 (JST) Received: from ocn-vc-mts-201c1.ocn.ad.jp ([153.138.219.212]) by mf-smf-unw005c1.ocn.ad.jp with ESMTP id xJu3kE3BKaeryxJvikLBIg; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:17:34 +0900 Received: from smtp.ocn.ne.jp ([153.149.227.165]) by ocn-vc-mts-201c1.ocn.ad.jp with ESMTP id xJvhkfc3Tf1TbxJvhkXnKU; Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:17:34 +0900 Received: from localhost (p1601136-ipoe.ipoe.ocn.ne.jp [114.172.254.135]) by smtp.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 7 Jan 2021 10:17:33 +0900 (JST) Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2021 10:17:29 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20210107.101729.1936921832901251107.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> To: geert@linux-m68k.org Cc: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de, mpm@selenic.com, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, dan.j.williams@intel.com, vkoul@kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net, miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, richard@nod.at, vigneshr@ti.com, kuba@kernel.org, a.zummo@towertech.it, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, broonie@kernel.org, wim@linux-watchdog.org, linux@roeck-us.net, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rtc@vger.kernel.org, linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] Remove support for TX49xx From: Atsushi Nemoto In-Reply-To: References: <20210106184839.GA7773@alpha.franken.de> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 6 Jan 2021 21:41:24 +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: >> > Is that sufficient to keep it? >> >> for me it is. But now we probaly need some reverts then... > > Indeed. Fortunately not all of it, as some removals were TX4938-only. These patches should not break RBTX4927: net: tc35815: Drop support for TX49XX boards spi: txx9: Remove driver mtd: Remove drivers used by TX49xx char: hw_random: Remove tx4939 driver rtc: tx4939: Remove driver ide: tx4938ide: Remove driver And these patches just break audio-support only. dma: tx49 removal ASoC: txx9: Remove driver I think dma and ASoC drivers are hard to maintain now, and can be dropped for basic support for RBTX4927. (TX39 boards does not have audio-support, so dma txx9 driver can be dropped too) --- Atsushi Nemoto