Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:2785:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id ia5csp3223443pxb; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:13:47 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxXHWwbt/i/xl1+q2zfooi9Vi8biHDsoDb9SktzpLHdAfxP04jT88UnmcjxK3TLl9pFCchh X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:ae42:: with SMTP id lf2mr2304846ejb.487.1610471627629; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:13:47 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1610471627; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=OOzY7iXhqmsLCZ36valTQInFZHtTuHKT/COHZG/560HIgiAm5v7ze6EEoo+34uyTqZ P0ormJJR3Mi4+yOeFXsvjzrR1l+yWSblPOluB1+fkFxyMQVRob/5Rj0eb9e9i1nq6GNY dxYX+YQd4GJ2nTDnzSsq2xv1O113j2ryLRwURjILbUWX8en0/IpwIVrSd5h+VCczhVDd zhEOGPh/0EE9L2keSTbdV0OMPC9a6V7RWekGC4Gvl2gOmg8AeSgexi2kCwmZZfz/zAhf CW4NT/gdGdIG4e79VIErkOMRLUy77bGbS2erTRSOr/cx8uK4sZzYsYQgn9k8VbEVYIyL RSVw== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:content-transfer-encoding :content-id:mime-version:subject:cc:to:references:in-reply-to:from :organization:dkim-signature; bh=0PkzLvgcA4r37DaY0fgu41zgOmPFRngjc6RumeAnzi8=; b=uJiZRCCkL3eHbPMMayvWMQWw+Z1rQ055q/fd93atUMD9oN9J9mjRneBe3mVb2e0NPf hOYtdjFxyCQHgnZkFVK04U6ZgMU5gtna+n22ObCdiGMJ2uTl5jTZz6VeRxSwA87H5KwU Syx0EYSucKvSJEIOYAKMNyf7l6sKBWNL+5H89aW2eFMWlztej1R/MGfTMwMTTHOLF4nB DPl+ikIJfGUwCjhlScWVWfPmKVa3FRwcDYvMOKd9O0eFrdUUUX1YTwYx+IqPpBxgILqP GlGJbAGsMuZGBwpCbQhOqj4kacONtlMRFwBs/xTv5YCwWK+/WRINzOjSli1GvYrc+1zz YTpA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iv0IbO12; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id q22si1537633edr.578.2021.01.12.09.13.27; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 09:13:47 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=iv0IbO12; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2406009AbhALRLi (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:11:38 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([216.205.24.124]:20677 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2406003AbhALRLh (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:11:37 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610471410; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0PkzLvgcA4r37DaY0fgu41zgOmPFRngjc6RumeAnzi8=; b=iv0IbO12/dZZwiXnnPUx0ih4J5GxOE6aAzEnV668T3V2S9jCp/TvbA/YhaqFFjP9totlMl 5iqJ/CmWsAsBE0jAn0z5Pg2IBXexLkdDMUiSJk5zHxsr+HnDbUB89mPzqb1pnd5xlbWsBh +wXkKT2OmcqvZGio1rv0SquEAGhumLU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-413-eKLBVP_zMJadl95gHCJEmg-1; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 12:10:06 -0500 X-MC-Unique: eKLBVP_zMJadl95gHCJEmg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx04.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63A428015A6; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-112-8.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.8]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C74A5D9D2; Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:10:00 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: References: <20200916004927.64276-1-eric.snowberg@oracle.com> <1360578.1607593748@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: Eric Snowberg Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, dwmw2@infradead.org, Jarkko Sakkinen , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com, nayna@linux.ibm.com, Mimi Zohar , erichte@linux.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2560431.1610471400.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2021 17:10:00 +0000 Message-ID: <2560432.1610471400@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.14 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org How about the attached? I've changed the function names to something that= I think reads better, but otherwise it's the same. David --- commit 8913866babb96fcfe452aac6042ca8862d4c0b53 Author: Eric Snowberg Date: Tue Sep 15 20:49:27 2020 -0400 certs: Add EFI_CERT_X509_GUID support for dbx entries = The Secure Boot Forbidden Signature Database, dbx, contains a list of = now revoked signatures and keys previously approved to boot with UEFI Secu= re Boot enabled. The dbx is capable of containing any number of EFI_CERT_X509_SHA256_GUID, EFI_CERT_SHA256_GUID, and EFI_CERT_X509_GUI= D entries. = Currently when EFI_CERT_X509_GUID are contained in the dbx, the entrie= s are skipped. = Add support for EFI_CERT_X509_GUID dbx entries. When a EFI_CERT_X509_G= UID is found, it is added as an asymmetrical key to the .blacklist keyring= . Anytime the .platform keyring is used, the keys in the .blacklist keyr= ing are referenced, if a matching key is found, the key will be rejected. = Signed-off-by: Eric Snowberg Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen Signed-off-by: David Howells diff --git a/certs/blacklist.c b/certs/blacklist.c index 6514f9ebc943..a7f021878a4b 100644 --- a/certs/blacklist.c +++ b/certs/blacklist.c @@ -100,6 +100,38 @@ int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash) return 0; } = +int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size) +{ + key_ref_t key; + + key =3D key_create_or_update(make_key_ref(blacklist_keyring, true), + "asymmetric", + NULL, + data, + size, + ((KEY_POS_ALL & ~KEY_POS_SETATTR) | KEY_USR_VIEW), + KEY_ALLOC_NOT_IN_QUOTA | KEY_ALLOC_BUILT_IN); + + if (IS_ERR(key)) { + pr_err("Problem with revocation key (%ld)\n", PTR_ERR(key)); + return PTR_ERR(key); + } + + return 0; +} + +int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7) +{ + int ret; + + ret =3D validate_trust(pkcs7, blacklist_keyring); + + if (ret =3D=3D 0) + return -EKEYREJECTED; + + return -ENOKEY; +} + /** * is_hash_blacklisted - Determine if a hash is blacklisted * @hash: The hash to be checked as a binary blob diff --git a/certs/blacklist.h b/certs/blacklist.h index 1efd6fa0dc60..420bb7c86e07 100644 --- a/certs/blacklist.h +++ b/certs/blacklist.h @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ #include +#include +#include = extern const char __initconst *const blacklist_hashes[]; + +#ifdef CONFIG_INTEGRITY_PLATFORM_KEYRING +#define validate_trust pkcs7_validate_trust +#else +static inline int validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, + struct key *trust_keyring) +{ + return -ENOKEY; +} +#endif diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c index 798291177186..cc165b359ea3 100644 --- a/certs/system_keyring.c +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c @@ -241,6 +241,12 @@ int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t= len, pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform keyring is not available\n"); goto error; } + + ret =3D is_key_on_revocation_list(pkcs7); + if (ret !=3D -ENOKEY) { + pr_devel("PKCS#7 platform key is on revocation list\n"); + goto error; + } } ret =3D pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys); if (ret < 0) { diff --git a/include/keys/system_keyring.h b/include/keys/system_keyring.h index fb8b07daa9d1..61f98739e8b1 100644 --- a/include/keys/system_keyring.h +++ b/include/keys/system_keyring.h @@ -31,11 +31,14 @@ extern int restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trus= ted( #define restrict_link_by_builtin_and_secondary_trusted restrict_link_by_b= uiltin_trusted #endif = +extern struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7; #ifdef CONFIG_SYSTEM_BLACKLIST_KEYRING extern int mark_hash_blacklisted(const char *hash); +extern int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t size); extern int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len, const char *type); extern int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len); +extern int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7); #else static inline int is_hash_blacklisted(const u8 *hash, size_t hash_len, const char *type) @@ -47,6 +50,14 @@ static inline int is_binary_blacklisted(const u8 *hash,= size_t hash_len) { return 0; } +static inline int add_key_to_revocation_list(const char *data, size_t siz= e) +{ + return 0; +} +static inline int is_key_on_revocation_list(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7) +{ + return -ENOKEY; +} #endif = #ifdef CONFIG_IMA_BLACKLIST_KEYRING diff --git a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c b/securit= y/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c index c5ba695c10e3..5604bd57c990 100644 --- a/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c +++ b/security/integrity/platform_certs/keyring_handler.c @@ -55,6 +55,15 @@ static __init void uefi_blacklist_binary(const char *so= urce, uefi_blacklist_hash(source, data, len, "bin:", 4); } = +/* + * Add an X509 cert to the revocation list. + */ +static __init void uefi_revocation_list_x509(const char *source, + const void *data, size_t len) +{ + add_key_to_revocation_list(data, len); +} + /* * Return the appropriate handler for particular signature list types fou= nd in * the UEFI db and MokListRT tables. @@ -76,5 +85,7 @@ __init efi_element_handler_t get_handler_for_dbx(const e= fi_guid_t *sig_type) return uefi_blacklist_x509_tbs; if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_sha256_guid) =3D=3D 0) return uefi_blacklist_binary; + if (efi_guidcmp(*sig_type, efi_cert_x509_guid) =3D=3D 0) + return uefi_revocation_list_x509; return 0; }