Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp228164pxb; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:31:24 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzyYpydtVxe6iEve1RKKwGtS2hrzge3FwZkWDUawagsbQRG9dwm6N9PaDcpPMYym16gIjLK X-Received: by 2002:a50:fc8c:: with SMTP id f12mr9237758edq.225.1611757883996; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:31:23 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1611757883; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=GWHqvphB+C9rDkhmRy5UOsHT6KfIkN382tfrk6wWsHyW8VoC8UIJJxrkDBxYZQG7h9 nJcBHNiTZJfMaReJxGtV5fxnQ1VxpIDoSNS5gyqA9hHAXKl8L+HpE7IMewIkkElKDVD+ OWdCPlAgBRI5o7lIdQwAmxue2DhTsb0eD5xwkGLnYPwgMScIIuBnfPD2r95HkubOLwl3 7vfiQCGDTD7LHdHz+2rAgEs63LbrhcMNN15Cahj+2jPx70LvG8h2jgx0ROOJTY4c2CKO AF5w758G/WBTenw9/tNywKs8VS/VmOjN7ziEg650WC+r9L6u8qz8ipUg40M6ii8Q1Fc6 2p2g== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:message-id:date:content-id:mime-version:subject :cc:to:references:in-reply-to:from:organization:dkim-signature; bh=3x3v94BjOwEDdN4Q5vF6tZl1Pibldsq9m5DYt5qg7Fk=; b=m6q5n+ftZuIJk3jlbSrKbhj9OATHFIofoaHzy2znkAH5xL+wbGpB/CmXVUrwOP4uRo zdSZtk6gatHjNfCj7TfRl5Hq0yeLHEnSyJh0N/GN7AGj7IAKVWc3/jwkg6eo+gE5PpSP svAHJefm7xPw6qOoB8fOhpuf55XH9TnrD+fwXPXN5pa/8zHiSzDD1kQ2uQZR5PCHCUur 59sjvS4y6iBjSRF+wdnRSRDc1Tt6cef9c1ru8745aTGAxHPba77hGHNPrU1ozxHFAv99 UulHKeMakGm5gJgosPbtr1xVUZ2cXmQDb1BR4uk9SFXisTZwuhhhe+AWkmYjitQPTUuv J15A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Uy70EYuc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id hp13si900387ejc.593.2021.01.27.06.29.34; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 06:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@redhat.com header.s=mimecast20190719 header.b=Uy70EYuc; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=redhat.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234119AbhA0OYp (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:24:45 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:56994 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S233928AbhA0OXo (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:23:44 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1611757336; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3x3v94BjOwEDdN4Q5vF6tZl1Pibldsq9m5DYt5qg7Fk=; b=Uy70EYuclV31XoO3Divx0/PSZsgE7hbrvl2FFGuBcLiRavWovgmPWWwmyBME9cio66k4k9 2upvdNxgs2O0bKAfc1JCNioNxz+5Ejh2OdowaMRF8171GqHTXrUg9YpYP7C1Jk2WudyWrV r66y8XbJ2D0TTLzC3m4yHjzxKAysCxU= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-270-hrOrMKrXOam1O0EEU5Fuow-1; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 09:22:12 -0500 X-MC-Unique: hrOrMKrXOam1O0EEU5Fuow-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx08.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA00B193578E; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:22:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-115-23.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.115.23]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5F519716; Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:22:09 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20210127123350.817593-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> References: <20210127123350.817593-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> To: Stefan Berger Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, patrick@puiterwijk.org, Stefan Berger Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] Add support for x509 certs with NIST p256 and p192 keys MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <3114061.1611757328.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2021 14:22:08 +0000 Message-ID: <3114062.1611757328@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.23 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Stefan Berger wrote: > This series of patches adds support for x509 certificates signed by a CA > that uses NIST p256 or p192 keys for signing. It also adds support for > certificates where the public key is a NIST p256 or p192 key. The math > for ECDSA signature verification is also added. > > Since self-signed certificates are verified upon loading, the following > script can be used for testing: > > k=$(keyctrl newring test @u) > > while :; do > for hash in sha1 sha224 sha256 sha384 sha512; do > openssl req \ > -x509 \ > -${hash} \ > -newkey ec \ > -pkeyopt ec_paramgen_curve:prime256v1 \ > -keyout key.pem \ > -days 365 \ > -subj '/CN=test' \ > -nodes \ > -outform der \ > -out cert.der > keyctl padd asymmetric testkey $k < cert.der > if [ $? -ne 0 ]; then > echo "ERROR" > exit 1 > fi > done > done > > It also works with restricted keyrings where an RSA key is used to sign > a NIST P256/P192 key. Scripts for testing are here: > > https://github.com/stefanberger/eckey-testing > > The ECDSA signature verification will be used by IMA Appraisal where ECDSA > file signatures stored in RPM packages will use substantially less space > than if RSA signatures were to be used. I've pulled this into my keys-next branch. David