Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley
        Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United
        Kingdom.
        Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903
From:   David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <20210129150355.850093-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20210129150355.850093-3-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20210129150355.850093-1-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:     dhowells@redhat.com, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        patrick@puiterwijk.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
        Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] x509: Detect sm2 keys by their parameters OID
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <4162800.1612185801.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Date:   Mon, 01 Feb 2021 13:23:21 +0000
Message-ID: <4162801.1612185801@warthog.procyon.org.uk>
Precedence: bulk

Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> 
> Detect whether a key is an sm2 type of key by its OID in the parameters
> array rather than assuming that everything under OID_id_ecPublicKey
> is sm2, which is not the case.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Cc: keyrings@vger.kernel.org

I presume these cc's are intentionally not on the first patch or the cover (if
there is one)?

Do you have a branch you want me to pull or did you want me to take just
patches 2-4?

David