Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp318593pxb; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:04:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw/bJhiBnsXDTsJzPMxqPiJfX9YBC7mKRGg0jkmVWfM53r05qzIiSQl/vX9ag3gSvn5uoZI X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:2790:: with SMTP id j16mr16010714ejc.420.1614164685456; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:04:45 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1614164685; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=T7At0JrvE9JXUBNCzUQakzMjRLWDJZt8dG+yDR4jEGJZ3/vuloWgTADyTVkoyX4k34 CkrHzONSUAHUbvvAFgM6EzwQx60UPUDPgyufTt6cpBdZixV0+Bx5bRkkKqqA+vM6MoIx rQlCvph9fter2xLwqaMLR9aJm5saFTqhmGJbol5mgmwrBGuMQ3av1vpFy8hfGLsf1Wwd wxCpPVJr13yS8m1jf+APuDPvYm9UPX3EuPSxT8+qnJE1yO0XxbBXotXnXvvX0aPSUwtD tKXTAjpnBttuWJZGpEs6eZZRRAPpHsnh473A//HzOVrsxLmzi1ieqvi/N1MHbjrHj5nG FJSA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:cc:to:subject :message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :dkim-signature; bh=q5EBUPu7DHD+FuA5SGZ+0iNoNfQivrRarTOBbjTJdyk=; b=Li83K4T13osQCKGfMzRi+FAHS7oJ+u+sGM2aPRwlPoDxAFt8TwchMk0HPYg/ZvSLAf 2dG9bkZ1YuckR/isjp/Orkxeo+FIYPezaFnaFIbXSq+P+8UbPr3HXcIVJMYMPEj5Ity9 y2J8saI4zVbWuJ5NhYcH87+JBp1zvE5dWnKnGlWRk/xvS5HIZL38VFkWpICh/E2kO+ij yJvRrwk3WFjQixh8d4fAvrI7odKhAIG1HjrL2cvPkxSIGwMDuqnf8B9UntLcUyrkf4IE AMVQ3fYkDJ4kyDi5cV6m7w8GsY1Cv6EvrRNVLL87rkvpDEpyfivcHIYTEtI7COupErRg gr9Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PpKt4nXg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j10si1061447eje.450.2021.02.24.03.04.16; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:04:45 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=PpKt4nXg; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234927AbhBXLCQ (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:02:16 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39080 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234385AbhBXLB6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Feb 2021 06:01:58 -0500 Received: from mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com (mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b2b]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F23DBC061574; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:01:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-yb1-xb2b.google.com with SMTP id u3so1443540ybk.6; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:01:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q5EBUPu7DHD+FuA5SGZ+0iNoNfQivrRarTOBbjTJdyk=; b=PpKt4nXgl8dkkxBzxuaLrjlXX0hqqCr8wUyXp2yPXNJFwryHemyu90dCsMWVBumO+n 1RL9h3nYbcv61lEowunFuKgz64z7Yzeh8Lgpc+qhcQk3o47Q8vXTa/1JqCs0I07wh3ha Uz5wfupBLDaMNbhfqzaE3k0qhkd7I5DtWuNC4bkQLJKrI5aDDHXPPyyYB1y2GQNdUs5T 5kHhKZrfhGu76w2/xSocoV9KQw24jWXlmIw0Kwd03g0L4j4RAnepznV2u3xE8Gs6fLMU EAMzIh826mV8TtupQHPvIlfwN+/s/AhkuamaO0KCG5dcOHlst96H3i75lGMtPG9LM+IU /Deg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=q5EBUPu7DHD+FuA5SGZ+0iNoNfQivrRarTOBbjTJdyk=; b=IzZAkbHDJe/QJxIrdWGAU7lMkIiSCp/M20ACbkl7H7Z5BowIQYipLWV7JJ9QJkuuW2 kN2KRYe5dcOGCPBVIqqtcpQ61KZsSSD49GQu1czAov4HVUKBslbkpxTCRC1XGaG8D9dQ ZYREryi2RCLrupnbYaye33/JzV03zilCFZANV0ekc+HR+M2kCOielz1OJJbYbmjFROlV 60DsShvsNHn70F56NyAX11S9HJTj3eZYrSGBsScWRdo1g6LeIwZGjKLQm6pulRX5oyT6 RAeGJM735uA3Q0JYf6Gf6WJFtZe1M6Mw4q6QIop2j9K6Rt1xV21x8c9mIz6PtGJdr9aS K5Fg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53144j2dPkZAsYro/5kmeOUcS4zkYpsR/piAqpI8etuM+Yil6d4v lJLETuMZhNYS//i8LnwTuWMrGnELvGVAkZyE49I= X-Received: by 2002:a25:324b:: with SMTP id y72mr46115248yby.233.1614164477289; Wed, 24 Feb 2021 03:01:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20210224072516.74696-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org> In-Reply-To: <20210224072516.74696-1-uwe@kleine-koenig.org> From: Anatoly Pugachev Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 14:01:06 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] vio: make remove callback return void To: =?UTF-8?Q?Uwe_Kleine=2DK=C3=B6nig?= Cc: Michael Ellerman , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , "David S. Miller" , Jens Axboe , Matt Mackall , Herbert Xu , Peter Huewe , Jarkko Sakkinen , Jason Gunthorpe , Haren Myneni , =?UTF-8?Q?Breno_Leit=C3=A3o?= , Nayna Jain , Paulo Flabiano Smorigo , Steven Royer , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Cristobal Forno , Jakub Kicinski , Dany Madden , Lijun Pan , Sukadev Bhattiprolu , Tyrel Datwyler , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Michael Cyr , Jiri Slaby , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Linux Kernel list , Sparc kernel list , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:17 AM Uwe Kleine-K=C3=B6nig wrote: > > The driver core ignores the return value of struct bus_type::remove() > because there is only little that can be done. To simplify the quest to > make this function return void, let struct vio_driver::remove() return > void, too. All users already unconditionally return 0, this commit makes > it obvious that returning an error code is a bad idea and makes it > obvious for future driver authors that returning an error code isn't > intended. > > Note there are two nominally different implementations for a vio bus: > one in arch/sparc/kernel/vio.c and the other in > arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/vio.c. I didn't care to check which > driver is using which of these busses (or if even some of them can be > used with both) and simply adapt all drivers and the two bus codes in > one go. Applied over current git kernel, boots on my sparc64 LDOM (sunvdc block driver which uses vio). Linux ttip 5.11.0-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e-dirty #189 SMP Wed Feb 24 13:48:37 MSK 2021 sparc64 GNU/Linux boot logs (and kernel config) on [1] for "5.11.0-10201-gc03c21ba6f4e-dirty"= . Up to you to add "tested-by". Thanks. 1. https://github.com/mator/sparc64-dmesg PS: going to check with ppc64 later as well on LPAR (uses vio).