Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:8c0a:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id go10csp2397850pxb; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:12:51 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJww+xjdQi0mQGsNSaO0kuaCeRp1ED86TlkTQ2RMdSX5OE8kdh6VwEu1Qnl1txpwYkvtAJEN X-Received: by 2002:a50:ec96:: with SMTP id e22mr2905262edr.385.1615281170773; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:12:50 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1615281170; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=vxI+uHg+xwOK+sai607TE4rdRTh3I+LABXhLhF8jZOBRf/kC5reVqo+KYKT9Wpbrwm 3h9gHH31k7v4i/Y6svuN+Oukcsk2LcpNHzEnkNf+xWqMM0N/Mg+7W3buLoCeySxzhtMW M9lL+nwcCQCBli7G+Gm4Juo+7gyZu/oBUla9Yp+wDqx9RjhrqGzhdRAESW8rErI3CWH0 oFLlJfVipTmszsq+VyNvSIaWnFNZAhhJnjG85R4kXyQUF/C0INejun11bW7btoVnXcC0 Du6R22Wv6BaLo5bBdpOfkdf2s/AyL01J3YOuQFDHoCRhvIp3bNHQ3BCueJFEZ9JRoUDk SNog== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject :cc:to:from:dkim-signature; bh=3jn01rfak00HumWqfPS+bL637Js5LvIW2OJzeMurQFU=; b=T29gXCuGG62h1rNskovTI2K38bkWkvk5ZnoTh3LCtPbZV4ONY6LrMvRy9k5rLt3YvO /nCcJMx7RxciI7oOLeRD9lF/Ab05w4fMcvmJwI5/2B258+8zWh7OcVJYwoKMhf5XDlPA F+ymThOP7rj8ZvOKV2mX3Lvg2DjgtjmOUQxVaCWFRpXV9GrD1RiucIctN9fm08W/lfEh ae//76AmvpftlRuicITOhsCl8hByJirDjUcQkUybaYUZfW5yvfiVxCSz0KUDL0Cak5Dz jrzR4a5h1umBYHiLk39HALu2zBusV8muxOYrG3TpiEzJPNsZUgFncbZDsJzCOQbUea70 uSZQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LamV33ty; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j4si8579542ejm.600.2021.03.09.01.12.27; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=LamV33ty; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=QUARANTINE dis=NONE) header.from=gmail.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229813AbhCIJLy (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 04:11:54 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:46032 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229881AbhCIJLY (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Mar 2021 04:11:24 -0500 Received: from mail-pj1-x1030.google.com (mail-pj1-x1030.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1030]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E069C06174A; Tue, 9 Mar 2021 01:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1030.google.com with SMTP id cl21-20020a17090af695b02900c61ac0f0e9so694894pjb.1; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:11:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=3jn01rfak00HumWqfPS+bL637Js5LvIW2OJzeMurQFU=; b=LamV33tyeHMdFMfQxIpS1ajCBd+iMj+xvwxqDF69aNw2moF5n0VgV/E4f3opbexC2x cZkNnkghu5XBUzzuRZpWbzWL5V5qbl4nhxqV+hGDmG5X/EdvNzcoS08U9GtYMNzZ3nKt 1LTa0xkw2aqrM+gxo9w6Dlxcri+/DWECCY0j+vqtAh0D29f/S3Qs57SWiwwpKN+/BLIl nRK72wFjTmZxbBItZoV+C+H30hvWpJxIFaY1Ic+99NFwGqCHFlNXMsITFwpyeJ8M+XKs i76iCbqDFSxl2T1fLM2m62oSgOZS0t8LLJDPe5BBoB5q6URUBKqLeE7amDneXtPb5XAr 0P7Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=3jn01rfak00HumWqfPS+bL637Js5LvIW2OJzeMurQFU=; b=VjaxX6jh5q+LOncNhfFvn5GDokCbN54v8kcdLwFhTuSRd9P/w6ikaO2QgLbwHYb0oR rDKGr9gJoPmR5NEbZN03FIFtLLAWQHmxO16n+tf6EMMEUZJeJ17bB1OmyIqxI3VcFxDP +BRoruCB0CUUhKlyka4lfBKQZ9iygCEpRlfL46IXmUcaS6zL9JC1DkoFKy4d8U8eS/75 iApJTOq1ZLDjXGgJhEVfyLDoWET6UrCDYiNy8NxreHZSHcNfuTKRppmVcE/zMehDEbQy +nownMMeMOb4wZsOi3+yvWtX6Ant49G1qGbV9j9wBIarsMOs4aRoj7z3qSdAFLAb9zPj YDKQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533zfpiNvj+/LUpnVPNu0js1VDdaY0ek/XxqDLXBmO86APErSOz5 lvVQ3S3b3g3TPZGc1DRreTM= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:1c0e:: with SMTP id oc14mr3633043pjb.188.1615281083237; Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from linux-l9pv.suse ([124.11.22.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id js16sm2094860pjb.21.2021.03.09.01.11.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 09 Mar 2021 01:11:22 -0800 (PST) From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" X-Google-Original-From: "Lee, Chun-Yi" To: David Howells Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S . Miller" , Ben Boeckel , Randy Dunlap , Malte Gell , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Lee, Chun-Yi" Subject: [PATCH 2/4] PKCS#7: Check codeSigning EKU for kernel module and kexec pe verification Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2021 17:10:42 +0800 Message-Id: <20210309091044.2298-3-jlee@suse.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.12.3 In-Reply-To: <20210309091044.2298-1-jlee@suse.com> References: <20210309091044.2298-1-jlee@suse.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org This patch adds the logic for checking the CodeSigning extended key usage when verifying signature of kernel module or kexec PE binary in PKCS#7. Signed-off-by: "Lee, Chun-Yi" --- certs/system_keyring.c | 2 +- crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig | 9 +++++++++ crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--- include/crypto/pkcs7.h | 3 ++- 4 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/certs/system_keyring.c b/certs/system_keyring.c index 4b693da488f1..c9f8bca0b0d3 100644 --- a/certs/system_keyring.c +++ b/certs/system_keyring.c @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ int verify_pkcs7_message_sig(const void *data, size_t len, goto error; } } - ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys); + ret = pkcs7_validate_trust(pkcs7, trusted_keys, usage); if (ret < 0) { if (ret == -ENOKEY) pr_devel("PKCS#7 signature not signed with a trusted key\n"); diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig index 1f1f004dc757..1754812df989 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/Kconfig @@ -96,4 +96,13 @@ config SIGNED_PE_FILE_VERIFICATION This option provides support for verifying the signature(s) on a signed PE binary. +config CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU + bool "Check codeSigning extended key usage" + depends on PKCS7_MESSAGE_PARSER=y + depends on SYSTEM_DATA_VERIFICATION + help + This option provides support for checking the codeSigning extended + key usage when verifying the signature in PKCS#7. It affects kernel + module verification and kexec PE binary verification. + endif # ASYMMETRIC_KEY_TYPE diff --git a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c index b531df2013c4..077bfef928b6 100644 --- a/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c +++ b/crypto/asymmetric_keys/pkcs7_trust.c @@ -16,12 +16,36 @@ #include #include "pkcs7_parser.h" +#ifdef CONFIG_CHECK_CODESIGN_EKU +static bool check_codesign_eku(struct key *key, + enum key_being_used_for usage) +{ + struct public_key *public_key = key->payload.data[asym_crypto]; + + switch (usage) { + case VERIFYING_MODULE_SIGNATURE: + case VERIFYING_KEXEC_PE_SIGNATURE: + return !!(public_key->eku & EKU_codeSigning); + default: + break; + } + return true; +} +#else +static bool check_codesign_eku(struct key *key, + enum key_being_used_for usage) +{ + return true; +} +#endif + /* * Check the trust on one PKCS#7 SignedInfo block. */ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo, - struct key *trust_keyring) + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage) { struct public_key_signature *sig = sinfo->sig; struct x509_certificate *x509, *last = NULL, *p; @@ -112,6 +136,12 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, return -ENOKEY; matched: + if (!check_codesign_eku(key, usage)) { + pr_warn("sinfo %u: The signer %x key is not CodeSigning\n", + sinfo->index, key_serial(key)); + key_put(key); + return -ENOKEY; + } ret = verify_signature(key, sig); key_put(key); if (ret < 0) { @@ -156,7 +186,8 @@ static int pkcs7_validate_trust_one(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, * May also return -ENOMEM. */ int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, - struct key *trust_keyring) + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage) { struct pkcs7_signed_info *sinfo; struct x509_certificate *p; @@ -167,7 +198,7 @@ int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, p->seen = false; for (sinfo = pkcs7->signed_infos; sinfo; sinfo = sinfo->next) { - ret = pkcs7_validate_trust_one(pkcs7, sinfo, trust_keyring); + ret = pkcs7_validate_trust_one(pkcs7, sinfo, trust_keyring, usage); switch (ret) { case -ENOKEY: continue; diff --git a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h index 38ec7f5f9041..b3b48240ba73 100644 --- a/include/crypto/pkcs7.h +++ b/include/crypto/pkcs7.h @@ -30,7 +30,8 @@ extern int pkcs7_get_content_data(const struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, * pkcs7_trust.c */ extern int pkcs7_validate_trust(struct pkcs7_message *pkcs7, - struct key *trust_keyring); + struct key *trust_keyring, + enum key_being_used_for usage); /* * pkcs7_verify.c -- 2.16.4