Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 9 Apr 2021 16:08:04 +0800
From:   Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>
To:     Stephan Mueller <smueller@chronox.de>
Cc:     Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
        "Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
        Toke =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=F8iland-J=F8rgensen?= <toke@redhat.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        Ondrej Mosnacek <omosnace@redhat.com>,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] [RESEND] wireguard: disable in FIPS mode
Message-ID: <20210409080804.GO2900@Leo-laptop-t470s>
References: <20210407113920.3735505-1-liuhangbin@gmail.com>
 <YG4gO15Q2CzTwlO7@quark.localdomain>
 <20210408010640.GH2900@Leo-laptop-t470s>
 <20210408115808.GJ2900@Leo-laptop-t470s>
 <YG8dJpEEWP3PxUIm@sol.localdomain>
 <20210409021121.GK2900@Leo-laptop-t470s>
 <7c2b6eff291b2d326e96c3a5f9cd70aa4ef92df3.camel@chronox.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <7c2b6eff291b2d326e96c3a5f9cd70aa4ef92df3.camel@chronox.de>
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Apr 09, 2021 at 09:08:20AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > And how do you handle all the other places in the kernel that use
> > > > > > ChaCha20 and
> > > > > > SipHash?? For example, drivers/char/random.c?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Good question, I will check it and reply to you later.
> > > > 
> > > > I just read the code. The drivers/char/random.c do has some fips
> > > > specific
> > > > parts(seems not related to crypto). After commit e192be9d9a30 ("random:
> > > > replace
> > > > non-blocking pool with a Chacha20-based CRNG") we moved part of chacha
> > > > code to
> > > > lib/chacha20.c and make that code out of control.
> > > > 
> > > So you are saying that you removed drivers/char/random.c and
> > > lib/chacha20.c from
> > > your FIPS module boundary?? Why not do the same for WireGuard?
> > 
> > No, I mean this looks like a bug (using not allowed crypto in FIPS mode) and
> > we should fix it.
> 
> The entirety of random.c is not compliant to FIPS rules. ChaCha20 is the least
> of the problems. SP800-90B is the challenge. This is one of the motivation of
> the design and architecture of the LRNG allowing different types of crypto and
> have a different approach to post-process the data.
> 
> https://github.com/smuellerDD/lrng

Thanks Stephan for this info. After offline discussion with Herbert, here is
what he said:

"""
This is not a problem in RHEL8 because the Crypto API RNG replaces /dev/random
in FIPS mode.
"""

I'm not familiar with this code, not sure how upstream handle this.

Thanks
Hangbin