Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp3539683pxj; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzrPwon2wMw7180EEiycG58/x8LbQV5u8C7bB1TJl8JOzcerTKvZMQpUmU/MGs9TbOBW/qj X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:2d0a:: with SMTP id c10mr21887952iow.12.1622558263544; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1622558263; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=oZ5/tjqeMLM9sVPTz0HsMW0rdJumM/HvNau/EjURZcim1+q+O/b7e0heWY+FQ8N5b0 kpkTC8ChV5nOIkPOdWrs76rfFVvQDmzqf58GMRqMi8Sr2fDYb136LhuY8ttZvrnoRNO+ yEcA7cPF6JzzZHht+AsYi2Y2X0JC2Jp5mAXaxNBHs6SD3HiJdf97GxurrJqnuXL9VHxN 9m29P6cBmpskqLzTY1P7ANUjy04OtNgNF9XMWloYj/IakVvvb/GWj04ZgRxWee6OcIK6 FVyCA5hG46DSbhV6Rf/j2txONHebCAqzA57biyfzB7XGdLtHPD2IIHTCrqJVgbsQPsjH OmLA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version :references:in-reply-to:message-id:date:subject:cc:to:from; bh=2axVqndY7DOi4OvGNTMiakIM+PKpW/TPVBS6N8uCGq4=; b=vz7wMS45C3aUoqSOCB1Ei+ldIMZXXHbk2i+VWtSymOlmfeXtdllljZ/k4ZiVfk8MRU vlD352iRXwk6KKsDA7jrlpMNUcUdgNS6ODS7lsm/EEok/d5kYKZ7pV7iYCqxriWNbUwc joo4wR1duSutkppgw1sfxQVQDusTVuaHk8TU2PXQXQGFtuvu0vbLOfPJZp+d7DOrZ6q5 RYhVTnCRu+6O6XB4y3nybD8uCQCRIbuv4C0AQGFVi7CAqhbwpYYFKNvATlI+PrLUvsyN rCbMxSO4kWq23CZqauUa/Zh9zKqcPGb0TaiStrxDfu7WBPq7ctC6plV4mBsCRMK3Cax9 8VjA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id b5si16109744jav.78.2021.06.01.07.37.26; Tue, 01 Jun 2021 07:37:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=huawei.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234142AbhFAOjF (ORCPT + 99 others); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:39:05 -0400 Received: from szxga08-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.255]:3327 "EHLO szxga08-in.huawei.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234014AbhFAOjE (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Jun 2021 10:39:04 -0400 Received: from dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.57]) by szxga08-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4FvZPf6fXWz1BGQ6; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:32:38 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggema755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.197) by dggemv711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.66) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:37:20 +0800 Received: from huawei.com (10.90.53.225) by dggema755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.197) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:37:20 +0800 From: Zhang Qilong To: , CC: , , Subject: [PATCH -next 2/2] crypto: omap-sham - Fix PM reference leak in omap sham ops Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2021 22:51:18 +0800 Message-ID: <20210601145118.126169-3-zhangqilong3@huawei.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.26.0.106.g9fadedd In-Reply-To: <20210601145118.126169-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com> References: <20210601145118.126169-1-zhangqilong3@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Originating-IP: [10.90.53.225] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggema755-chm.china.huawei.com (10.1.198.197) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org pm_runtime_get_sync will increment pm usage counter even it failed. Forgetting to putting operation will result in reference leak here. We fix it by replacing it with pm_runtime_resume_and_get to keep usage counter balanced. Fixes: 604c31039dae4 ("crypto: omap-sham - Check for return value from pm_runtime_get_sync") Signed-off-by: Zhang Qilong --- drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c b/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c index ae0d320d3c60..dd53ad9987b0 100644 --- a/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c +++ b/drivers/crypto/omap-sham.c @@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ static int omap_sham_hw_init(struct omap_sham_dev *dd) { int err; - err = pm_runtime_get_sync(dd->dev); + err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dd->dev); if (err < 0) { dev_err(dd->dev, "failed to get sync: %d\n", err); return err; @@ -2244,7 +2244,7 @@ static int omap_sham_suspend(struct device *dev) static int omap_sham_resume(struct device *dev) { - int err = pm_runtime_get_sync(dev); + int err = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(dev); if (err < 0) { dev_err(dev, "failed to get sync: %d\n", err); return err; -- 2.17.1