Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:206:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id 6csp39801pxj; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:41:22 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwVpLCMGkELKJ2RzXjyPfvp0h7gAE0GbCZQ2bkEK/tRqiPTjRhaKwpe+EZj3U/EXaD74Yfr X-Received: by 2002:aa7:d388:: with SMTP id x8mr3351096edq.338.1623897682684; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:41:22 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1623897682; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=e0MaxRs9SscXathA8jDJfQz/uxfC1GjldX/2lpFlDX7zkHQGAxlqhNkF/tJWd+U1QZ HSEtdK3tGCK8kbeA48zjFHLvi/o1r2SI7MzNE3apOR8v9c6/jkHpr0SXhw+XwptyR3O/ VM41WgHRU66jaXg8c0IFlz5q+MQ0b0sSkIn0qYv/9Zv/pbDwg24XgziFJReDbLbOZTl/ Z+jUDBVAGoFw+8k7NLyvPth01oHU1JIAk7ZOv4lWZTNqcg7zfocdd0U5/IcyqNA/FLqz WK66JZ+JbJYAIlsQ7XahZ7/3AGHfGTbZCzxA5HUKSFk7kWjYzBaP+1CP0/w9lf8fbj4p yiTg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:cc :to:from:date:sender:dkim-signature; bh=KIvX93fO1J/dtkzHBZn8boN5+A8/IK0ceANMVQz1H7w=; b=UV5kyvWO5yKVWgh+xN5Tr2e8Nk8gmIN9wejsS2WG8bd9HSqeHpaqq4ZoMimFkL9kyl R1/70j+otrIXZ5FrmYzav4F6NN7zA1LYEYuhK0ywnVtY0kb0OTqW7hktPZTjVUCu9Za7 ghTMamfqenUZ7Yf73zBO11Lk20KBP2PV5Ung9XlSLDanUKQN0dy7tDbCnkFH7smKQGFo LIqLgxpySjM4lwiVV5GhS1S/JTf3EIkKS7srT9MpYxOkfkhrVgYl/dyNIyzvLjL//Pf2 YnOrV0KIItznHaJk08JHCcXJPjhL0P9hiWLj6VW2upJsRteE1F5qZqMkTVWMRzzMCITV Ol0Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qyWGlEfB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id y15si4067672eju.51.2021.06.16.19.40.53; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 19:41:22 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=qyWGlEfB; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234987AbhFQA3x (ORCPT + 99 others); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:53 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:45906 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231322AbhFQA3w (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:29:52 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82e.google.com (mail-qt1-x82e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::82e]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C08C061574; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-qt1-x82e.google.com with SMTP id a15so3349534qtx.13; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:27:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=KIvX93fO1J/dtkzHBZn8boN5+A8/IK0ceANMVQz1H7w=; b=qyWGlEfBCmuW1vkYP1a/17mpWZwFwo2b5T6H+eLhobsEMeZT9UI2+HPorM9Gaxj2TJ K+Pmp82x05L9FQvOlDVvPBw8SU6Id7yv/C5zy8Pu/j195dQDGp7mIDjoTA+f+4t9SX8A 56+ONe+Ce1iadJJrIdcf0xlCKR2r0bFVDuP708nvc7PQL5ioQf7Xl1S0jDNnky2J9cLr WN7uqwghTSmqJHcsO9rWBJO7clEh5DG+MocU4I7rnYOowVJkXo8ozuNW1LaG/Mz4b6e9 ylqKMrlWM2mtHfrykRQND+VsO9m/Xe9moKN42gmu+XTbXxQNOLm0V9FweP67GI93V7jd Jw7w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition :content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to; bh=KIvX93fO1J/dtkzHBZn8boN5+A8/IK0ceANMVQz1H7w=; b=q84JL6lZypDOI74c4l8/o7ZoCVCxqtdoqj23YqP5mppfZ48mwzxshPp6wjukZZF5O5 TDBvMXkgmZgLv6WVhiD6BJt4BXXc9Wn4Nz8Q9Ub6/D86nCwTmtyC0eHNIK7/i1tVfHCY kNrH6Ow3DkoEqAx8WsDJC2ttYE5vqh4G4TNyQiaPTfK+Qa7Wg2lPF3Ipq0aBKUsI4T18 PJ8mfVyiYfsxbegnBjWqFORxluvOcvthtp5Sq4x9/h7budLHlM4XvKUl6BbQri7Ejl/m ywH5MhdJQwMe5cu31njORSv3SRvnrS8kpsDycdWedlTdE9f1/3EF9x+yVTyJJeK5h6ih Hp+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qoc88FGh2UkmrA1QIjcawN7j0Haz/nF9Ypu5ybNRsZXa/gR77 Z3oqlaRVrYE2r0TlAJTXyB/tjmM8m628HA== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:7d0c:: with SMTP id g12mr2469507qtb.248.1623889663317; Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:27:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fedora (cpe-24-59-204-221.twcny.res.rr.com. [24.59.204.221]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o12sm668710qki.44.2021.06.16.17.27.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 16 Jun 2021 17:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Date: Wed, 16 Jun 2021 20:27:39 -0400 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk To: Jianxiong Gao Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk , Christoph Hellwig , Dominique MARTINET , Linus Torvalds , Horia =?utf-8?Q?Geant=C4=83?= , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Lukas Hartmann , Aymen Sghaier , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , "linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org" , "iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org" , Marc Orr , Erdem Aktas , Peter Gonda Subject: Re: swiotlb/caamjr regression (Was: [GIT PULL] (swiotlb) stable/for-linus-5.12) Message-ID: References: <2e899de2-4b69-c4b6-33a6-09fb8949d2fd@nxp.com> <20210611062153.GA30906@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Jun 16, 2021 at 01:49:54PM -0700, Jianxiong Gao wrote: > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 3:35 AM Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jun 11, 2021 at 08:21:53AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 05:52:07PM +0300, Horia Geantă wrote: > > > > I've noticed the failure also in v5.10 and v5.11 stable kernels, > > > > since the patch set has been backported. > > > > > > FYI, there has been a patch on the list that should have fixed this > > > for about a month: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20210510091816.GA2084@lst.de/T/#m0d0df6490350a08dcc24c9086c8edc165b402d6f > > > > > > but it seems like it never got picked up. > > > > Jianxiong, > > Would you be up for testing this patch on your NVMe rig please? I don't > > forsee a problem.. but just in case > > > I have tested the attached patch and it generates an error when > formatting a disk to xfs format in Rhel 8 environment: Thank you for testing that - and this is a bummer indeed. Jianxiong, How unique is this NVMe? Should I be able to reproduce this with any type or is it specific to Google Cloud? Dominique, Horia, Are those crypto devices somehow easily available to test out the patches? P.S. Most unfortunate timing - I am out in rural areas in US with not great Internet, so won't be able to get fully down to this until Monday.