Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Fri, 30 Jul 2021 10:55:44 +0800
From:   Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com>
Cc:     davem@davemloft.net, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org,
        brendanhiggins@google.com, davidgow@google.com,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kunit-dev@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 1/2] crypto: tcrypt: minimal conversion to run under
 KUnit
Message-ID: <20210730025544.GA12781@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20210715213138.1363079-1-dlatypov@google.com>
 <20210715213138.1363079-2-dlatypov@google.com>
 <20210723064328.GA7986@gondor.apana.org.au>
 <CAGS_qxqOD+Bcvy7xti7_eg8+H1cJcfp94BtnRhuzijDcaGF_uA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAGS_qxqOD+Bcvy7xti7_eg8+H1cJcfp94BtnRhuzijDcaGF_uA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13)
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, Jul 23, 2021 at 12:31:28PM -0700, Daniel Latypov wrote:
>
> Thanks, that makes a lot of sense.
> In that case, how useful would `kunit.py run` be? I.e. Do people
> mostly want to see numbers on bare metal?

I think it's a mix of both.  As in performance on bare metal and
under virtualisation may be of interest.  I don't think you're going
to be going through kunit for the speed tests though, because you
need to supply module parameters for tcrypt to do that.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt