Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:c604:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id y4csp714142pxt; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:04:36 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxQ/SPFWC6iCtuzhE4WLXl8roPQcQSw9AbDLfemEE9o0HB/4aS2CDdT9Appj/L8GGUIKoRE X-Received: by 2002:aa7:c794:: with SMTP id n20mr6023367eds.244.1628780675874; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:04:35 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1628780675; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=AL9HE0E9egFkCOIDnjZPHo0yuqYF98Nm69pgMMcwnJkdaJXaCMQWTOGEhur14nvNsy 2XshgZgSMXMgF5154EigFcmzESGzynIkC2UmH/mS6NVZeLsXfGI1RWxvlJJTUcqyRczW xOUyBVxdCoN19URjeu5fJNn/VyV/FHdnpMYA60HFSgFN+FN/qw3xMPyhscy1dCxK+SUe 2xydApcXnsWm5GYp78KstgnWl4ei7eef8Ef6ngjicMWTvr9V1hqDgSXMrM+sN4EjysA+ X4/fGOFvtwea+BYHhy3xPdo10OzMtcyKiMgdhHWupfvLFfB0pITLpfj73SfpcGDsndWt 2S1A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date; bh=4sRcQM+cw5Zij9XYo72dY2xaxWYd2vR8IGwHOFERbio=; b=qOtbU4JpToir++w53XustNa+uONy2SOxvH60MLCVHCjqjbHKdkSS0uwuESNlhb9ynS oyUQkXl8+LAdvVAeyNpKC3dn1Ow+d5Dez3nr+G3LFLcNjuJJ5qJ75lhkpIScsceN7s5N kSgxOqqU0VTQKLB/dqFB/VvIu4+CtjMCUIjidWoxul3CiQhjuuxka/MQSV3xW6bIda0L 05Q4wCv/LYWGdonUORmzT6EpotBw3cIP5MBb6odolLLZA1LuWrjVSM0VzaQPsamcx0Ur xq+Y9eCmhKXpDjYM57zTnYoRqchj6iJ4efALZCdSKeyvpdq9EvNb6Rtornk3a1rkDsuO kd9w== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id ko18si2561317ejc.537.2021.08.12.08.03.52; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 08:04:35 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S233027AbhHLOAL (ORCPT + 99 others); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:00:11 -0400 Received: from vmicros1.altlinux.org ([194.107.17.57]:37284 "EHLO vmicros1.altlinux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232351AbhHLOAL (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Aug 2021 10:00:11 -0400 Received: from imap.altlinux.org (imap.altlinux.org [194.107.17.38]) by vmicros1.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E484A72C8FB; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:59:43 +0300 (MSK) Received: from altlinux.org (sole.flsd.net [185.75.180.6]) by imap.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 931454A46F1; Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:59:43 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2021 16:59:43 +0300 From: Vitaly Chikunov To: Tianjia Zhang Cc: Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Eric Biggers , Eric Biggers , Gilad Ben-Yossef , Ard Biesheuvel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jia Zhang , "YiLin . Li" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] crypto: tcrypt - Fix the wrong position of return value test statement Message-ID: <20210812135943.mnuce4252wp4xi52@altlinux.org> References: <20210812131748.81620-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> <20210812131748.81620-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210812131748.81620-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com> Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Tianjia, On Thu, Aug 12, 2021 at 09:17:46PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote: > The position of the return value test statement of crypto_aead_setkey() > is wrong, adjust to make it work properly. This commit message does not explain anything. It's nearly equivalent to "fix". > > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang > --- > crypto/tcrypt.c | 13 ++++++------- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/crypto/tcrypt.c b/crypto/tcrypt.c > index d73a42fdaa9b..73c97e085baf 100644 > --- a/crypto/tcrypt.c > +++ b/crypto/tcrypt.c > @@ -612,6 +612,12 @@ static void test_aead_speed(const char *algo, int enc, unsigned int secs, > } > } > ret = crypto_aead_setkey(tfm, key, *keysize); Perhaps, you would say that return value of crypto_aead_setkey was lost. > + if (ret) { > + pr_err("setkey() failed flags=%x\n", > + crypto_aead_get_flags(tfm)); > + goto out; > + } > + > ret = crypto_aead_setauthsize(tfm, authsize); But, isn't now return value of crypto_aead_setauthsize is lost? Thanks, > > iv_len = crypto_aead_ivsize(tfm); > @@ -622,15 +628,8 @@ static void test_aead_speed(const char *algo, int enc, unsigned int secs, > printk(KERN_INFO "test %u (%d bit key, %d byte blocks): ", > i, *keysize * 8, bs); > > - > memset(tvmem[0], 0xff, PAGE_SIZE); > > - if (ret) { > - pr_err("setkey() failed flags=%x\n", > - crypto_aead_get_flags(tfm)); > - goto out; > - } > - > sg_init_aead(sg, xbuf, bs + (enc ? 0 : authsize), > assoc, aad_size); > > -- > 2.19.1.3.ge56e4f7