Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 19 Aug 2021 11:45:35 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To:     Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Cc:     x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>,
        Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
        Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
        Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
        Sergio Lopez <slp@redhat.com>, Peter Gonda <pgonda@google.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>,
        Dov Murik <dovmurik@linux.ibm.com>,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@ibm.com>,
        Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>,
        Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, tony.luck@intel.com,
        brijesh.ksingh@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH Part1 RFC v4 22/36] x86/sev: move MSR-based VMGEXITs for
 CPUID to helper
Message-ID: <YR4oP+PDnmJbvfKR@zn.tnic>
References: <20210707181506.30489-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
 <20210707181506.30489-23-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20210707181506.30489-23-brijesh.singh@amd.com>
Precedence: bulk

Finally drop this bouncing npmccallum at RH email address from the Cc
list.

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 01:14:52PM -0500, Brijesh Singh wrote:
> From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
> 
> This code will also be used later for SEV-SNP-validated CPUID code in
> some cases, so move it to a common helper.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@amd.com>
> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c | 84 +++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> index be4025f14b4f..4884de256a49 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/sev-shared.c
> @@ -184,6 +184,58 @@ static enum es_result sev_es_ghcb_hv_call(struct ghcb *ghcb,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int sev_es_cpuid_msr_proto(u32 func, u32 subfunc, u32 *eax, u32 *ebx,

Since it is not only SEV-ES, then it should be prefixed with "sev_" like
we do for the other such functions. I guess simply

	sev_cpuid()

?

> +				  u32 *ecx, u32 *edx)
> +{
> +	u64 val;
> +
> +	if (eax) {

What's the protection for? Is it ever going to be called with NULL ptrs
for the regs? That's not the case in this patchset at least...

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette