Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <YQ0Qm+Xs1g/7Eant@fedora> <20210809141027.860850-1-chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com>
 <20210820083111.GA28484@gondor.apana.org.au>
In-Reply-To: <20210820083111.GA28484@gondor.apana.org.au>
From:   Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 20 Aug 2021 13:14:52 +0200
Message-ID: <CAMj1kXGMPimX0_dR_kLuzZjuJK9rM=uCpRDtoJq0UjWq12M10A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: xts_crypt() return if walk.nbytes is 0
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
        Linux Crypto Mailing List <linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        syzbot+20191dc583eff8602d2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Precedence: bulk

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 10:31, Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 09, 2021 at 07:40:27PM +0530, Shreyansh Chouhan wrote:
> > xts_crypt() code doesn't call kernel_fpu_end() after calling
> > kernel_fpu_begin() if walk.nbytes is 0. The correct behavior should be
> > not calling kernel_fpu_begin() if walk.nbytes is 0.
> >
> > Reported-by: syzbot+20191dc583eff8602d2d@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyansh Chouhan <chouhan.shreyansh630@gmail.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > index 388643ca2177..ec6eac57c493 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aesni-intel_glue.c
> > @@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ static int xts_crypt(struct skcipher_request *req, bool encrypt)
> >               return -EINVAL;
> >
> >       err = skcipher_walk_virt(&walk, req, false);
> > -     if (err)
> > +     if (err || !walk.nbytes)
> >               return err;
>
> The err check is now redundant because when there is an error
> nbytes is always zero.
>

In spite of that, I have a slight preference for this version, given
that it makes it obvious that we bail on two separate conditions:
- an error has occurred
- no error has occurred but the resulting walk is empty

Testing walk.nbytes only needlessly obfuscates the code, as we need to
return 'err' in the end anyway.