Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:5bc5:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id os5csp1951822pxb; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 01:48:28 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxPlmdrtv67rFUY+1A5H7Zz0QSUd1K51qhnDk1bd5yMbSwRH6kNiwwNFQBGUZhfbQgaKg5g X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:935:: with SMTP id au21mr21689774ejc.156.1634460507814; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 01:48:27 -0700 (PDT) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1634460507; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=IiUs+VVOwv7T5UzSNJnJQFQC50joV2zCp9xfPpCJzz451T1B7hf/VOwNTvcMEApJ5l +y/lktUkUV7SgwJAZYg/FUbtaiR4g4nDr1bUiFnqijhikTnLNP19NV7RALHdRdwlFzIE 5e/5n27HJID9/hOPWN9liVgN4g5UNP4FUvn911uQHp0BmEbE5c2/Z+XFK1wqCYm30HdE 6siMnaHSmczYERPWLwp5D/UvwskzAasXOAKEAlzU6arv4SMdyb6F7KnWndteONY8sKDB x4n2pZZtXIuvg5Z4Q8PbtEh6yGG0SHXgmHsfKjub2abA/VM2Xxx5iixLTA//r3Kl0rXD yTRQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=zSHOcs5t+6dTQwUxuGH/T7ott4w7EhNYJHh3Z2GocjA=; b=zkFvD9Mq/yqHfsACg6ErxzH54bjSat0O/mLjo2KYCVN+1kUt70YRxlp0VZbhh7MrOd IlKGJd1VMCUYmVhKNKItaHYg9pzuKBLreK/xiPz6v54bXuIts2gK4NzPMaP0myBMznu3 BVRW5iZTTvZQ5D6s1EwRmbifGVm1cSXL39KGZE0+6DHa4bp7DnfyZpT9g8YbqydJ3pTS Mk9YlUAe8lx+1iBrZdjMouZI3O9hYaJ1Z3BTOZiUK6LvQN+KdPk5OQ5jYQXhbqNDeikW A87l52NtYArv3akKgFdK0Fayx8u4J4QQQE2SB1ymE1zWUaLo6iR750b2HG0d9wRUoRUz 6aYQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=AIhx2i9v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org. [23.128.96.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id x44si17074087ede.131.2021.10.17.01.47.45; Sun, 17 Oct 2021 01:48:27 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=AIhx2i9v; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S241525AbhJOQqO (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:46:14 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:59008 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S232499AbhJOQqO (ORCPT ); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 12:46:14 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-x432.google.com (mail-pf1-x432.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::432]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68E54C061570 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pf1-x432.google.com with SMTP id v8so4697971pfu.11 for ; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zSHOcs5t+6dTQwUxuGH/T7ott4w7EhNYJHh3Z2GocjA=; b=AIhx2i9vMNxJmE3uzyIojUAXtN7O9RaN/DTCaA0s69W6dr/F02lHnP46eAy1BAczkS q/3YYgROnZDdu5KCTulYeoTevurQP6Gw5YJGpPrpkCXsWSaAG/7Dih1O8GYvfBoti6ih kWI3J8o2p5RY4iOXrGsIDYzHDgFP2sUvsa2EIaEjcIgIwtaQ4NTbC8eQrJm1x3x3O5im YMvd241FxnNuepC7dK1eisKKJKQ1BpEAqBI/BIduLf6/9f4tVUulzs16bdEq/8dAKwNO viQuoJJMMY0w+TJ+XEfkw8zNkCYHm85q8evdIoeYwNcXPQO/lnBVnHZmNXVduzKXLEZ2 LbIA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=zSHOcs5t+6dTQwUxuGH/T7ott4w7EhNYJHh3Z2GocjA=; b=1C04Dy/AShK7ybHs52FBSAZjvkgik10OrOf8Igvmw/iQvMPC/2FyZcxhB8t2tnLyLM o1shKHv6LuuFcgf50RKaeyXlrM35+LL2GFsod81qEz7FcBEaiTKiTvTEdwZFY0ZHkly6 CciuAhbX2SptWKh/Z87LpTbCg4jvwdudtbvObxiNi8kYCFv1gqo/IqaRFbvdnCOKxRio Wcj1hyT3TPO6Iyf9bYWAf2rOfqjKf03d0qBfOERalZX9nBVd4ZCLbzh4X2Ebay53qnPH QjOXvLvm7V+y5omiKGfwvnrqsKhfZ5YpvcQanqkPMTbOXFVuSwurNkka8vwmKOmdJYLv oiuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530YHpeeY4OcMp475KnhlMGpE1Qyj/Wrx0Ve4TkclFr7yBf+68y/ xJ591/5FTlShZXSraZl2WTeiHO02W2zwag== X-Received: by 2002:a63:e613:: with SMTP id g19mr10102661pgh.12.1634316246676; Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from google.com (157.214.185.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.185.214.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o14sm5451095pfh.84.2021.10.15.09.44.05 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 15 Oct 2021 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2021 16:44:02 +0000 From: Sean Christopherson To: Brijesh Singh Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , Joerg Roedel , Tom Lendacky , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ard Biesheuvel , Paolo Bonzini , Vitaly Kuznetsov , Wanpeng Li , Jim Mattson , Andy Lutomirski , Dave Hansen , Sergio Lopez , Peter Gonda , Peter Zijlstra , Srinivas Pandruvada , David Rientjes , Dov Murik , Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum , Borislav Petkov , Michael Roth , Vlastimil Babka , "Kirill A . Shutemov" , Andi Kleen , tony.luck@intel.com, marcorr@google.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH Part2 v5 34/45] KVM: SVM: Do not use long-lived GHCB map while setting scratch area Message-ID: References: <20210820155918.7518-1-brijesh.singh@amd.com> <20210820155918.7518-35-brijesh.singh@amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 15, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: > > On 10/13/21 2:20 PM, Sean Christopherson wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 20, 2021, Brijesh Singh wrote: > >> The setup_vmgexit_scratch() function may rely on a long-lived GHCB > >> mapping if the GHCB shared buffer area was used for the scratch area. > >> In preparation for eliminating the long-lived GHCB mapping, always > >> allocate a buffer for the scratch area so it can be accessed without > >> the GHCB mapping. > > Would it make sense to post this patch and the next (Remove the long-lived GHCB > > host map) in a separate mini-series? It's needed for SNP, but AFAICT there's > > nothing that depends on SNP. Getting this merged ahead of time would reduce the > > size of the SNP series by a smidge. > > While testing with random configs, I am seeing some might_sleep() warns. > This is happening mainly because during the vmrun the GHCB is accessed > with preempt disabled. The kvm_vcpu_map() -> kmap() reports the warning. > I am leaning towards creating a cache on the vmgexit and use that cache > instead of the doing a kmap() on every access. Does that sound okay to you ? Since SEV is 64-bit only, it should be ok to add a kvm_vcpu_map_atomic() variant.