Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/20] crypto: qce: Add new compatibles for qce crypto
 driver
To:     Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org
Cc:     bhupesh.linux@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        devicetree@vger.kernel.org, robh+dt@kernel.org, agross@kernel.org,
        herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, davem@davemloft.net,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
References: <20211013105541.68045-1-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
 <20211013105541.68045-16-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
From:   Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
Message-ID: <6aecc0aa-6219-d440-0075-39935aec0c7e@linaro.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Oct 2021 10:07:20 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/78.11.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20211013105541.68045-16-bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk


On 10/13/21 6:55 AM, Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> Since we decided to use soc specific compatibles for describing
> the qce crypto IP nodes in the device-trees, adapt the driver
> now to handle the same.
> 
> Cc: Thara Gopinath <thara.gopinath@linaro.org>
> Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>
> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhupesh.sharma@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/crypto/qce/core.c | 4 ++--
>   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> index 033c7278aa5d..2ab0b97d718c 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/qce/core.c
> @@ -298,8 +298,8 @@ static int qce_crypto_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   }
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id qce_crypto_of_match[] = {
> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,crypto-v5.1", },
Hi Bhupesh,

I think we should keep the qcom,crypto-v5.1 here for backward 
compatibility. Since v5.4 was added only recently it might be okay to 
remove it.

-- 
Warm Regards
Thara (She/Her/Hers)


> -	{ .compatible = "qcom,crypto-v5.4", },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,ipq6018-qce", },
> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sdm845-qce", },
>   	{}
>   };
>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, qce_crypto_of_match);
>