Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 23.128.96.18 as permitted sender) client-ip=23.128.96.18;
Date:   Thu, 28 Oct 2021 09:44:18 +0300
From:   Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@kernel.org>
To:     Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc:     James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
        Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
        Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@gmx.de>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
        David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
        James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
        "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
        Jerry Snitselaar <jsnitsel@redhat.com>,
        linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] crypto: use SM3 instead of SM3_256
Message-ID: <YXpGwl/AAqLKye37@iki.fi>
References: <20211026075626.61975-1-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
 <20211026075626.61975-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20211026075626.61975-2-tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 03:56:25PM +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> According to https://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-oscca-cfrg-sm3-01.html,
> SM3 always produces a 256-bit hash value and there are no plans for
> other length development, so there is no ambiguity in the name of sm3.
> 
> Suggested-by: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>

The commit message does not contain a description of what kind of code
change you're doing.

/Jarkko