Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595BBC433FE for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4023B610F9 for ; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 19:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236201AbhKNTOq (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:14:46 -0500 Received: from mail-ua1-f44.google.com ([209.85.222.44]:34804 "EHLO mail-ua1-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236231AbhKNTOo (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2021 14:14:44 -0500 Received: by mail-ua1-f44.google.com with SMTP id n6so13712650uak.1; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:11:23 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/Sknt59G7NNuQ4Eiu1wyh6p23EFcYGDA0b1KDBZyFXw=; b=LL3JGMB2RccvlA5j6Magq7CxV92Nz3BsC/tQQ2wwhtr3LAJWyNJ1jZRPV5ZmwxOmyB 72n6Vj560XD4isHc/Iyu2DY2UFqVDgpnL2VKVYK1jBAee+Bv840Il26xF/2CDKZa3BDj NjFAVp85q9WSGA6SblDHtnnHLBpbrLAsVYNeGqYN1+903RrM/NKR/23Fre/lqGXWO2qj aUb2g65J8MqvRnhP8GcA2h4awPFeJVOfWGCJF5pmECAPwJ0cDmxy601uGRY0udTTQjkE oB1ys9dEHKLYghaqJhDJlBwRD7WefQq1SRRhpM5krNuHvjpfQ81xLoxT6naeLOdBU0M4 XCSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530wvVqRBGqM7S8cOcyQM6jQnt0gHTC10PzDJ1780pTvUmqo4se/ n2K45ob+tAQWUFOaLxo5cy3rxOIpHCuuWg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzqdlbsEs5KQQtqZrLrI6Utz4fvnNwCGHzOCplarahvTji8sdzDOgqVzqRW06qr6wkBSecECw== X-Received: by 2002:ab0:3049:: with SMTP id x9mr49248710ual.55.1636917083009; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:11:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail-vk1-f175.google.com (mail-vk1-f175.google.com. [209.85.221.175]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c23sm7726257vko.8.2021.11.14.11.11.21 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:11:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-vk1-f175.google.com with SMTP id 84so7993704vkc.6; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:11:21 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 2002:a1f:f24f:: with SMTP id q76mr49851846vkh.11.1636917081468; Sun, 14 Nov 2021 11:11:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211109013058.22224-1-nickrterrell@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Sun, 14 Nov 2021 20:11:10 +0100 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] zstd changes for v5.16 To: Sedat Dilek Cc: Nick Terrell , Linus Torvalds , Stephen Rothwell , Linux Crypto Mailing List , linux-btrfs , squashfs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kernel Team , Nick Terrell , Chris Mason , Petr Malat , Yann Collet , Christoph Hellwig , =?UTF-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBNaXJvc8WCYXc=?= , David Sterba , Oleksandr Natalenko , Felix Handte , Eric Biggers , Randy Dunlap , Paul Jones , Tom Seewald , Jean-Denis Girard Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Nov 13, 2021 at 10:12 PM Sedat Dilek wrote: > On Tue, Nov 9, 2021 at 2:24 AM Nick Terrell wrote: > > I am sending you a pull request to add myself as the maintainer of zstd and > > update the zstd version in the kernel, which is now 4 years out of date, > > to the latest zstd release. This includes bug fixes, much more extensive fuzzing, > > and performance improvements. And generates the kernel zstd automatically > > from upstream zstd, so it is easier to keep the zstd verison up to date, and we > > don't fall so far out of date again. > is it possible to have an adapted version of your work for Linux > v5.15.y which is a new kernel with LongTerm Support (see [1])? Let's wait a bit before porting this to stable... bloat-o-meter output for an atari_defconfig build with the old/new zstd code (i.e. before/after commit e0c1b49f5b674cca ("lib: zstd: Upgrade to latest upstream zstd version 1.4.10"): vmlinux: add/remove: 96/28 grow/shrink: 28/29 up/down: 51766/-38162 (13604) CONFIG_ZSTD_DECOMPRESS=y due to CONFIG_RD_ZSTD=y (which is the default) Not a small increase, but acceptable, I guess? lib/zstd/zstd_compress.ko: CONFIG_ZSTD_COMPRESS=m add/remove: 183/38 grow/shrink: 58/37 up/down: 346620/-51074 (295546) Function old new delta ZSTD_compressBlock_btultra_dictMatchState - 27802 +27802 ZSTD_compressBlock_btopt_dictMatchState - 27614 +27614 ZSTD_compressBlock_doubleFast_dictMatchState - 24420 +24420 ZSTD_compressBlock_btultra_extDict - 24376 +24376 ZSTD_compressBlock_fast_dictMatchState - 16712 +16712 ZSTD_compressBlock_btultra2 - 15432 +15432 ZSTD_compressBlock_btopt_extDict 9052 24096 +15044 ZSTD_initStats_ultra - 15040 +15040 ZSTD_compressBlock_btultra - 14802 +14802 ZSTD_compressBlock_doubleFast_extDict_generic 2432 12216 +9784 ZSTD_compressBlock_doubleFast 8846 16342 +7496 ZSTD_compressBlock_fast_extDict_generic 1254 8556 +7302 ZSTD_compressBlock_btopt 8826 15184 +6358 ZSTD_compressBlock_fast 3896 9532 +5636 ZSTD_compressBlock_lazy2_extDict 6940 11578 +4638 ZSTD_compressSuperBlock - 4440 +4440 ZSTD_resetCCtx_internal - 3736 +3736 ZSTD_HcFindBestMatch_dedicatedDictSearch_selectMLS.constprop - 3706 +3706 ... An increase of 288 KiB? My first thought was bloat-a-meter doesn't handle modules correctly. So I enabled CONFIG_CRYPTO_ZSTD=y, which made CONFIG_ZSTD_COMPRESS=y, and the impact on vmlinux is: add/remove: 288/0 grow/shrink: 5/0 up/down: 432712/0 (432712) Whoops... All of the top functions above just call ZSTD_compressBlock_opt_generic() with different parameters. Looks like the forced inlining FORCE_INLINE_TEMPLATE size_t ZSTD_compressBlock_opt_generic(ZSTD_matchState_t* ms, seqStore_t* seqStore, U32 rep[ZSTD_REP_NUM], const void* src, size_t srcSize, const int optLevel, const ZSTD_dictMode_e dictMode) is not that suitable for the kernel... Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds