Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DE8C433F5 for ; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:31:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S243858AbiAJTbP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:31:15 -0500 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:1828 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S243831AbiAJTbO (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Jan 2022 14:31:14 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1641843074; x=1673379074; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=cbEnl3Vfju27AwT6EgqVlpPsZM4JemUZUkFPfJnaPBA=; b=HmcXGgoOUPWoAQTB8QrTUhD6aBX/GkeS8Omwz3aQXEZhK2vTd8Ji0M1Z nvScB0ls6A2ROwDSKgYRm3XFB84+FfmWBsSO1gq6RxrH8qjG/ebCrZ0V6 blh7TQhhrUFfbMl9LR7cTSMf6ZSweG6lPX9HQfuTllmpNxLhLkAPitXxe pd6Ohylku9o7tvuzY4Rba1TWMC5b10FxnDP98iajSBdV3giX+TOdnn2St aXkFZcYnkIsci6D2pY8jRqXwyUqSL4aB7kBTVDGEfR8N5Ygg0GuW3lkW4 JhJ3j1cl48dqvnhTdVCcLBQZjpSaPUMvAdrQCznT7zaIR4XfudIPZshoq A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6200,9189,10223"; a="243259724" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,277,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="243259724" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2022 11:31:13 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.88,277,1635231600"; d="scan'208";a="472174244" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO 276f1b88eecb) ([10.239.97.150]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2022 11:31:10 -0800 Received: from kbuild by 276f1b88eecb with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1n70Nq-0003tC-2U; Mon, 10 Jan 2022 19:31:10 +0000 Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 03:30:09 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Michal Suchanek , keyrings@vger.kernel.org, linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org Cc: kbuild-all@lists.01.org, Michal Suchanek , kexec@lists.infradead.org, Philipp Rudo , Mimi Zohar , Nayna , Rob Herring , linux-s390@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/6] module: Move duplicate mod_check_sig users code to mod_parse_sig Message-ID: <202201110303.sLPF0o29-lkp@intel.com> References: <59d134a3eae4fa802ed9135385cee6fe4838ec01.1641822505.git.msuchanek@suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <59d134a3eae4fa802ed9135385cee6fe4838ec01.1641822505.git.msuchanek@suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hi Michal, Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve: [auto build test ERROR on powerpc/next] [also build test ERROR on s390/features linus/master jeyu/modules-next v5.16 next-20220110] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch] url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Michal-Suchanek/KEXEC_SIG-with-appended-signature/20220110-215157 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/powerpc/linux.git next config: arc-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220111/202201110303.sLPF0o29-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: arceb-elf-gcc (GCC) 11.2.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/cc363ca7724d96c534c176b8ed248336f562b7ae git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux git fetch --no-tags linux-review Michal-Suchanek/KEXEC_SIG-with-appended-signature/20220110-215157 git checkout cc363ca7724d96c534c176b8ed248336f562b7ae # save the config file to linux build tree mkdir build_dir COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=gcc-11.2.0 make.cross O=build_dir ARCH=arc SHELL=/bin/bash If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/module_signing.c: In function 'verify_appended_signature': >> kernel/module_signing.c:33:35: error: passing argument 2 of 'mod_parse_sig' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 33 | ret = mod_parse_sig(data, len, &sig_len, key_being_used_for[purpose]); | ^~~ | | | long unsigned int * In file included from kernel/module_signing.c:11: include/linux/module_signature.h:45:45: note: expected 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *' 45 | int mod_parse_sig(const void *data, size_t *len, size_t *sig_len, const char *name); | ~~~~~~~~^~~ kernel/module_signing.c:33:40: error: passing argument 3 of 'mod_parse_sig' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 33 | ret = mod_parse_sig(data, len, &sig_len, key_being_used_for[purpose]); | ^~~~~~~~ | | | long unsigned int * In file included from kernel/module_signing.c:11: include/linux/module_signature.h:45:58: note: expected 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *' 45 | int mod_parse_sig(const void *data, size_t *len, size_t *sig_len, const char *name); | ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors -- security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c: In function 'ima_read_modsig': >> security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c:47:33: error: passing argument 2 of 'mod_parse_sig' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 47 | rc = mod_parse_sig(buf, &buf_len, &sig_len, func_tokens[func]); | ^~~~~~~~ | | | long unsigned int * In file included from security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c:12: include/linux/module_signature.h:45:45: note: expected 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *' 45 | int mod_parse_sig(const void *data, size_t *len, size_t *sig_len, const char *name); | ~~~~~~~~^~~ security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c:47:43: error: passing argument 3 of 'mod_parse_sig' from incompatible pointer type [-Werror=incompatible-pointer-types] 47 | rc = mod_parse_sig(buf, &buf_len, &sig_len, func_tokens[func]); | ^~~~~~~~ | | | long unsigned int * In file included from security/integrity/ima/ima_modsig.c:12: include/linux/module_signature.h:45:58: note: expected 'size_t *' {aka 'unsigned int *'} but argument is of type 'long unsigned int *' 45 | int mod_parse_sig(const void *data, size_t *len, size_t *sig_len, const char *name); | ~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~ cc1: some warnings being treated as errors vim +/mod_parse_sig +33 kernel/module_signing.c 16 17 /** 18 * verify_appended_signature - Verify the signature on a module 19 * @data: The data to be verified 20 * @len: Size of @data. 21 * @trusted_keys: Keyring to use for verification 22 * @purpose: The use to which the key is being put 23 */ 24 int verify_appended_signature(const void *data, unsigned long *len, 25 struct key *trusted_keys, 26 enum key_being_used_for purpose) 27 { 28 unsigned long sig_len; 29 int ret; 30 31 pr_devel("==>%s %s(,%lu)\n", __func__, key_being_used_for[purpose], *len); 32 > 33 ret = mod_parse_sig(data, len, &sig_len, key_being_used_for[purpose]); --- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org