Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:1a4d:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id nk13csp5546248pxb; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 01:29:28 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGucQijMCl9oRTJv7plZai6Hfhm43Ny8HWc/HgpMUpAt7yk7iRV4z0cQanlL+iHlge0qq/ X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:6a05:: with SMTP id qw5mr10614167ejc.90.1644830967990; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 01:29:27 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1644830967; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=xcaGDtllI8ipjg0okmOPyRXcQnVf+WvrhHVUzgYK0kUW1+RGmKUKeXldDqDCOTpFna re5f+h/AvQuHSAjPpivpb3sq4x/70SDbnZ4yh9Cc/VLsJYnZoJugRfO39xfMkm79+D5y 03tWLzWQP1eQsjHUyC+2BYDsm2hrnUcar4PqDSNukOuegRxQm23Ph525izFuM8sansgh gRWQpVcul/vNF6lYtq5qo4ICjS/d7f8bJGBfFkMWvoSg5eEpj/SzeWAr14Iahoy/GlIe riIWZeka1bIGTDFaQt0N2vgsjOUqvNAuy5gDmY4FSP/T+2GvKUuQNxT8eXTEzW2j4DlX UjQQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:dkim-signature; bh=QRDH9vbLQS3f2Q0ccQNr5Qp4Ug7VGO9DxqH6NW74phY=; b=PqIdnYlXTsFl3Yb3y5yWMYoa3s55y8+FBGyt8uaq6u6ER5LPeytP7CiKpliBRy1GUS VDm1SCivPAMHLNUVnwbzjNhjJCT/jXVgmTS9UYyk+OE61pwPkNioTFHYwp5LYAOcVNS6 KMU0qng9KZfc57v21SkEdoCqxjEK9Kt92DerFW8IlBfMguK8S4brOnQmsS3x0Y1XRHvn pm1TzJmtj9PmpL/gPsZ6KMS/ZViR4br+y6L5bJF+YD3COMn6Z2/9OXgAnkNZA2TsG54C neFfReyxo/2GVNX6MDF7LIdZZ2SgcDLkKRnrfDH4enuAMyv1LSP5ov9sBZkZjxaGuEP3 dbew== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NJIxKes7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 4si18686917ejr.136.2022.02.14.01.28.59; Mon, 14 Feb 2022 01:29:27 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@google.com header.s=20210112 header.b=NJIxKes7; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=REJECT sp=REJECT dis=NONE) header.from=google.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1353222AbiBKUak (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:30:40 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:33144 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351181AbiBKUaj (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:30:39 -0500 Received: from mail-lj1-x229.google.com (mail-lj1-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::229]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA33CCCC for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:30:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-lj1-x229.google.com with SMTP id e17so14046221ljk.5 for ; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:30:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=QRDH9vbLQS3f2Q0ccQNr5Qp4Ug7VGO9DxqH6NW74phY=; b=NJIxKes7hqTAQq6UETKdRks+KkvgxMtmurUEuG0s8UMHc3d/LRgcB/qBrCsrX0FFVA uZ5lyBVJufxhoGZLIH3NGuSNMbTVXbfgT8/MifUJQFws3Ts8wbGQ5JshOYM7+NQUWBgU uHwliOvgNoDGpAEG4oKjQVATcchkoR7JLQ8g2524zxfpFA+sVznoAzKcH2nJf8hlgmrE meUKL3x10CCZwPRsO3c5IiKsnrWPnR8gbX3KbMrcOY6TtQrMjUh5xSzEUDX9zfZx1UjG 9j4fdB3t7L4H6AvSjX0NQkcMYL1jASb6M0umgeviBWV96O5v+tT1W+aspMd6uEw6lfdz R1sg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=QRDH9vbLQS3f2Q0ccQNr5Qp4Ug7VGO9DxqH6NW74phY=; b=7bInpN0HVWw4d6TNX1hAFp775hwTv89kWAOvr1mDiGvTCbdy4bJolcfLftEBrAeknX 2TvCoqSJ88I35s52C20/kQeWjg0IhxMjRrBwUtTnECL7zfgkZ17J9Jc5Oar+7Rhjwxwt RovHZar8AcXpkuRFhXpdoVik1pi2wI7y/cpRRySgMVEoI/HW6ti61wRkKvL0OyxQd77L uNwI0M7XuT2JcFPyuX9XnfC0FdznCt7F03Q3xi6mdl0SBlhPGWJ3mtB/1dHfPrUgkAPy j83rZ4JnYPZ/oBekwrNLJViUoHiOGE2laotiCEqFpTnoFl0RlhoRA4y6QnpTElNNLPhi EdHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5338Imzfobt0SKs3V8+mdZL8PxWjL99F06p/2gCdHpdZmX6dl723 y9SXWqLqigOmCC6QRdc1cImgZJ6URJ/0ohfi0xizuA== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8686:: with SMTP id l6mr1951872lji.145.1644611435564; Fri, 11 Feb 2022 12:30:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220210232812.798387-1-nhuck@google.com> <20220210232812.798387-6-nhuck@google.com> In-Reply-To: From: Nathan Huckleberry Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 14:30:24 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 5/7] crypto: arm64/aes-xctr: Add accelerated implementation of XCTR To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Linux Crypto Mailing List , Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , Linux ARM , Paul Crowley , Eric Biggers , Sami Tolvanen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE,USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL,USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 5:48 AM Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 00:28, Nathan Huckleberry wrote: > > > > Add hardware accelerated version of XCTR for ARM64 CPUs with ARMv8 > > Crypto Extension support. This XCTR implementation is based on the CTR > > implementation in aes-modes.S. > > > > More information on XCTR can be found in > > the HCTR2 paper: Length-preserving encryption with HCTR2: > > https://eprint.iacr.org/2021/1441.pdf > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Huckleberry > > --- > > > > Changes since v1: > > * Added STRIDE back to aes-glue.c > > > > NAK. Feel free to respond to my comments/questions against v1 if you > want to discuss this. Oops, I misunderstood the tail block behavior of the CTR implementation and thought it wouldn't work with XCTR mode. I have XCTR mirroring the tail behavior of CTR now. I'll submit it with the v3.