Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:7420:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id hk32csp1915241pxb; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:33:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzpEgXltrwuvvdmk2IxAgKb2XFsUWfGcRqC9nvPtQKM/KNjaiSaPcWC2rHZHxnt0Lpai1am X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:9886:b0:14d:a230:d41 with SMTP id s6-20020a170902988600b0014da2300d41mr9859309plp.159.1645241584251; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:33:04 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645241584; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=tsGyASjIZE18uFemVqBRNKCPaO99mXChv9hj0krd76vhM87ohkKiP6OzzzdDMzW7EW bpDTgI+hqGxw3wTp8mAEYfK6ssGROtPUkUV1yy/T0oUf/V6EUpw0Pcaaap4LK2DTUXrg VjL8ppAHgXsMz5zpo672/90nYR8bJ7ZSiKLQOVNmmc2SavPNyGeJXaBxRf1sf1Nn4TRG iO1QPZOzf5FG5+1b/7eCaTGsEDoLJdA4ouE38WAZ7g3h4AMtnzBGmdOQ+vJoCgrAzLSW kXPJN2H11X6znSj6Fhu6e5VM8+1fRTyPVHAjkuexiSKxmyfLocLeNZgW/gPJ/yE50+uR DrCA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=4eD2Bt0wA3AYd7gPDrwYXSGZYKxXErxrxuZq+VuMb8U=; b=afgzRHkZw0cN6GuFMyLMCaYWLg4TFt1lbqPX8V6FNNFhzXKvKGU7jj1/fTwMA+/RKK RCWg72iCYuxXO4ysHc2JxDMagdLzlCr/XsZZjZUcXG9on3uFEVyeb6nDdNRrigC42pEk UCp7c9/jFFo32fM3Wt/nBKM7YMtawVRIsBGdUqlFhKXEqRsUuYjbKE0AohEUBQw6RLL0 upZMUArgeNcBrQzzGl5FeUURR0ZQ3SBk9zdKExdxy9hJHIYmG97GrLtSrbvo7weyCb88 1P/c2H/8uCMVXB3GLlseACbgFSGsYeRuZZ99izHV+0MmWUa31bsdJEJVG8OFp84AhF94 QDTg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=rqVYBLLt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id j75si11671894pgc.718.2022.02.18.19.32.33; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 19:33:04 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@kernel.org header.s=k20201202 header.b=rqVYBLLt; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S240780AbiBSB2m (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:28:42 -0500 Received: from mxb-00190b01.gslb.pphosted.com ([23.128.96.19]:54338 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S240872AbiBSB2i (ORCPT ); Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:28:38 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4224F606E2 for ; Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:28:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D39AA62023 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 01:28:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EBDBC340E9; Sat, 19 Feb 2022 01:28:20 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1645234100; bh=meqdSYQ17as6D2gC+1QtuY2/hf013mG8sWxTTeQxu50=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=rqVYBLLtb2HpAM9zDNnWMjpNt/bhxVYAPdnZA5rFCUvFDZhvilxvQrhtudrBlzWkw SfZBluri6VRZPXo63A1Q7DyGe1+22dVBCgLNmFElrTyNudB/Kv3tCL1E5gd3FGTiZn ruE9586qkAnkzHYHiXwI4UeJLTb1+45yX+oBo0GBf5Ne3n4KXu6XRJ05F4HXs8yevZ mMkwJGECmIxDUKLK+CJ4HE8RSfIp1r+mCYlnel47GRDse/HAkOK0Jubktqa6np9L0X IcDQZK9eqa4HKZ1n9Fcb4eVc8YrprENfIEEQRLgecFnpum/hoySDD8DO2dLQzaGtHV i28Rsy9W7q1yg== Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 17:28:18 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Nathan Huckleberry Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, Herbert Xu , "David S. Miller" , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Paul Crowley , Sami Tolvanen , Ard Biesheuvel Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/7] crypto: x86/aesni-xctr: Add accelerated implementation of XCTR Message-ID: References: <20220210232812.798387-1-nhuck@google.com> <20220210232812.798387-5-nhuck@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20220210232812.798387-5-nhuck@google.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 11:28:09PM +0000, Nathan Huckleberry wrote: > diff --git a/arch/x86/crypto/aes_xctrby8_avx-x86_64.S b/arch/x86/crypto/aes_xctrby8_avx-x86_64.S > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..53d70cab9474 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/x86/crypto/aes_xctrby8_avx-x86_64.S > @@ -0,0 +1,529 @@ > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-3-Clause */ > +/* > + * AES XCTR mode by8 optimization with AVX instructions. (x86_64) > + * > + * Copyright(c) 2014 Intel Corporation. > + * > + * Contact Information: > + * James Guilford > + * Sean Gulley > + * Chandramouli Narayanan > + */ > +/* > + * Implement AES XCTR mode with AVX instructions. This code is a modified > + * version of the Linux kernel's AES CTR by8 implementation. > + * > + * This is AES128/192/256 XCTR mode optimization implementation. It requires > + * the support of Intel(R) AESNI and AVX instructions. > + * > + * This work was inspired by the AES XCTR mode optimization published > + * in Intel Optimized IPSEC Cryptographic library. > + * Additional information on it can be found at: > + * https://github.com/intel/intel-ipsec-mb > + */ So I haven't looked at this closely yet, but one thing I noticed is that this file is pretty long, and it's almost identical to aes_ctrby8_avx-x86_64.S. Perhaps it would make sense to add XCTR support to that file rather than duplicating most of it into this new file? You could add an is_xctr argument to the macros to allow making parts conditional on CTR or XCTR when needed. - Eric