Received: by 2002:a05:6a10:9afc:0:0:0:0 with SMTP id t28csp309231pxm; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:23:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzwmXJlXrfh5y1/gW7adewOCSgPRbEkQSZXR9hv+ADUfejVz88SbB9cnkmxYuLr2rGoER5B X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6b0a:b0:14d:8ee9:3298 with SMTP id o10-20020a1709026b0a00b0014d8ee93298mr8117128plk.125.1645806216414; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:23:36 -0800 (PST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; t=1645806216; cv=none; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; b=ZuO02aDOBeE3Op1FWD0tAOpXXHNu+ufVfn0r8bal0S/5DTqioIZqRxCIWUOu8A/d5h z1pmCWRPh7OMO8+Kt9TYN5wBxazgE0xbQY1ZdutAnccj0Eajkpg42eUXrOtxd77JxFt5 OKAcCjh3pSDHtvi1CIeH4ZT4AAnNIT4fNtCWh8VRYZDPAwFRsz+gGIcpStehmSJEmxGP VyMHEe2R2bbN6W4HQetJtaLr18Y9l/lq35tcRC1Z+1bjeh16NcLWkzMAPtg86m7MLo4y STS2Z/l/VqfXZo6k5LoyO0pgeFRWXNrPworLw4fH1HDxZZs5wfVcKO3/n43gFGqSTH0b d3qA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=arc-20160816; h=list-id:precedence:in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version :references:message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:dkim-signature; bh=IsOywQAnx5u1lAniICwae+nr6IyMZXA1OmfzCOAb3Zw=; b=J67f8hG/bssuchuGK7QOjssxgmupTNELBINzz4f7SYpOkHM71yjhU3ftCUOnDDFjLf 10o1TGZvdWhBL584ceuKJbcyjy8J3QA1J664L9jdGjpu1yUsUt8t6BPQwPN14JOvPEAN K8dEYh69YOKQjm0xOUuKYid2TV2KWQHE6BstSoIY2FYThQdxkDhwAnpeccRh+FvOKz4e 5tBk049EdThPMnBuDTxr3pW5DUTn1UtV/Q2A9vOFy26P40oJHipBHZepoUrXaFmH6E8/ tHcFJE1vEaHiSUrIEar3oKqoAC8wTJ0aT9fBq3abuYwoHdDIGCSD/SRdjF+kpqwpUQcz JNaA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=FPOE4Qfk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Return-Path: Received: from out1.vger.email (out1.vger.email. [2620:137:e000::1:20]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id i17-20020a635411000000b003644cdb823csi2152223pgb.78.2022.02.25.08.23.20; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 08:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) client-ip=2620:137:e000::1:20; Authentication-Results: mx.google.com; dkim=pass header.i=@zx2c4.com header.s=20210105 header.b=FPOE4Qfk; spf=pass (google.com: domain of linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org designates 2620:137:e000::1:20 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=NONE sp=NONE dis=NONE) header.from=zx2c4.com Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S239036AbiBYPoC (ORCPT + 99 others); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:44:02 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:41902 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S242272AbiBYPoA (ORCPT ); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 10:44:00 -0500 Received: from ams.source.kernel.org (ams.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4601:e00::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBF811D9B4C; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 07:43:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ams.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A9A6B83267; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D7222C340F0; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:43:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=zx2c4.com header.i=@zx2c4.com header.b="FPOE4Qfk" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zx2c4.com; s=20210105; t=1645803798; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=IsOywQAnx5u1lAniICwae+nr6IyMZXA1OmfzCOAb3Zw=; b=FPOE4QfkcpcpUHrB2A1WDXR+lDY0zAzQkW+btr90FjI2KBwsgaXqxcYUaTh74AR13T3bec Yuq+dmEB1KAL/5o47dh+J4dVfjPgqb27eTMZOdgW6wbmQITTDTy+iVOdHrF9uOTLWjEQUa 8CU9l2kxaCjN41L3TOwepJegb1r1BCs= Received: by mail.zx2c4.com (ZX2C4 Mail Server) with ESMTPSA id b8ce3d14 (TLSv1.3:AEAD-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256:NO); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 15:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 16:43:11 +0100 From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" To: Alexander Graf Cc: Ard Biesheuvel , KVM list , Linux Crypto Mailing List , linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , adrian@parity.io, ben@skyportsystems.com, Daniel =?utf-8?B?UC4gQmVycmFuZ8Op?= , Colm MacCarthaigh , Dexuan Cui , "Woodhouse, David" , Eric Biggers , Eduardo Habkost , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Haiyang Zhang , Igor Mammedov , Jann Horn , KY Srinivasan , Laszlo Ersek , Dominik Brodowski , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , QEMU Developers , "Weiss, Radu" , Stephen Hemminger , "Theodore Y. Ts'o" , Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] virt: vmgenid: introduce driver for reinitializing RNG on VM fork Message-ID: References: <20220225124848.909093-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <05c9f2a9-accb-e0de-aac7-b212adac7eb2@amazon.com> <88ebdc32-2e94-ef28-37ed-1c927c12af43@amazon.com> <9ac68552-c1fc-22c8-13e6-4f344f85a4fb@amazon.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on lindbergh.monkeyblade.net Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Hi Alex, On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 04:22:54PM +0100, Alexander Graf wrote: > I don't understand the rush here. This had been sitting on the ML for 1 > year - and now suddenly talking the match through properly and getting > VMGenID spec compatible matching support into the ACPI core is a > problem? What did I miss? :) I don't think this is a question about speed. Ard doesn't like the spec. You like the feature more than you dislike the spec. Apparently that means there's a disagreement. As I mentioned earlier, I'd encourage you to send a patch to the ACPI people and let them decide. If that gets in, then I'm fine with modifying vmgenid to meet the spec and take advantage of the change you'll be making to the ACPI code. If it is rejected by the ACPI people, and consequently Linux isn't able to match on _CID, then I guess we'll have the next best thing, which is "well, it still works on QEMU." Hopefully you'll convince them. Feel free to CC me on that patch. Jason